Skip to content
All library documents

Adjusting Caplet and Floorlet Pricing for Different Day-Count Fractions

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Micio Geremia

Summary

The document examines how to price IBOR-linked caplets and floorlets when the underlying FRA uses different day-count conventions for its floating and fixed legs. The standard Black formula multiplies the option value by one accrual fraction, but real market conventions may use different fractions, such as actual/360 for floating and 30/360 for fixed in EUR markets.

It proposes converting the quoted strike by the ratio of the fixed-leg accrual fraction to the floating-leg fraction before applying Black’s formula. The text asserts this adjustment is mathematically correct and asks whether it is also appropriate from a trading perspective, but it does not provide an answer or market evidence. The discussion is therefore a focused pricing question: the formula and convention mismatch are explained, while implementation, calibration, and trading implications remain unresolved.

Key ideas

  • The standard caplet and floorlet Black formula assumes a shared accrual fraction for the FRA’s two legs.
  • Market FRA conventions can assign different day-count fractions to floating and fixed payments.
  • The proposed adjustment rescales the strike by the ratio of the fixed accrual fraction to the floating accrual fraction.
  • The document raises but does not resolve whether this mathematical adjustment matches trading practice.

Tags

Full text
# Cap & Floor pricing using distinct year fractions for floating and fixed rates


# Cap & Floor pricing using distinct year fractions for floating and fixed rates












The usual Black (lognormal) formula to price IBOR-linked caplets and floorlets (see e.g. Brigo & Mercurio textbook) reads $$ \textit{cf}(t;T_{i-1},T_i,K,\omega) = N P_d(t,T_i)\tau(T_{i-1},T_i) \times\textit{Black}\left[F_{x,i}(t),K,v_x(t;T_{i-1}),\omega\right], $$ with somewhat obvious notation (see below). This pricing formula makes the assumption that the year fraction $\tau(T_{i-1},T_i)$ associated to the floating and fixed legs of the underlying FRA (Forward Rate Agreement) is the same. Actually, this is not true for real market FRAs, where the the fixed leg has daycount 30/360 and the floating leg has daycount act/360 (at least in the EUR case, see e.g. LSEG/Refinitiv page ICAPEURO2).

Now the question is: how to modify the formula above to correctly take into account the appropriate market conventions? One possible solution could be to rescale the strike $K$ with the ratio between the fixed and floating leg year fractions, denoted by $\tau_K(T_{i-1},T_i)$ and $\tau_x(T_{i-1},T_i)$, respectively, as $$ K \rightarrow K' = K\frac{\tau_K(T_{i-1},T_i)}{\tau_x(T_{i-1},T_i)}. $$

This approach is correct from a mathematical point of view (if you disagree, please explain). Is it correct also from a trading point of view?

Notation: in the previous formula $N$ is the nominal amount, $t$ is the valuation date, $\left[T_{i-1},T_i\right]$ is the future interest rate period, $\tau(T_{i-1},T_i)$ is the year fraction, $K$ is the strike, $\omega=\pm1$ distinguishes between caplets and floorlets, $P_d(t,T_i)$ is the discount factor (taken e.g. from the EUR OIS curve), $F_{x,i}(t)$ is the forward rate (taken e.g. from the EURIBOR6M curve), $v_x(t;T_{i-1})$ is its lognormal variance for the period $\left[t,T_{i-1}\right]$ and $$\textit{Black}\left[F,K,v,\omega\right] = \omega \left\{F\Phi\left(\omega d^{+}\right)-K\Phi\left(\omega d^{-}\right)\right\},\\ d^{\pm} =\frac{\ln\frac{F}{K}\pm\frac{v}{2}}{\sqrt{v}},\\ v(t,T) = \int_t^T\sigma(u)^2\,du,\quad \sigma(t,T) := \sqrt{\frac{v(t,T)}{\tau(t,T)}} ,\\ \Phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^x e^{-\frac{1}{2}y^2}\,dy,\\ dF_i(t) = F_i(t)\sigma(t)dW^{Q_d^{T_i}}(t) $$ is the usual Black formula, where $Q_d^{T_i}$ is the $T_i-$ forward measure associated to the numeraire $P_d(t,T_i)$.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.