Applying Itô’s Formula to a Discounted Call Option Expectation
Summary
The document examines a derivation that applies Itô’s formula to the discounted payoff of a call option inside a conditional expectation. It raises questions about when differentiation can be interchanged with expectation, how the payoff derivative enters the calculation, and why a time differential appears when maturity is fixed. The response addresses the first two points by appealing to regularity and integrability conditions for interchanging differentiation and expectation, and by applying the product rule to the discount factor and payoff.
The material is a partial clarification rather than a complete derivation. The response notes that technical conditions matter and does not resolve the maturity-versus-current-time question in its main explanation. The call payoff also has a kink at the strike, so treating it as smoothly differentiable everywhere requires care; a rigorous treatment may use generalized derivatives or smooth approximations. Readers should check the full pricing setup before applying the displayed steps.
Key ideas
- Interchanging differentiation and expectation requires suitable regularity and integrability conditions.
- The discounted payoff differential can be expanded using the product rule.
- Itô’s formula contributes first- and second-order terms from the underlying price process.
- A fixed maturity parameter should be distinguished from the evolving current time.
- The payoff’s kink at the strike requires care in a formal derivation.
Tags
Full text
# Why is Ito applied this way?
# Why is Ito applied this way?
Given the price of a call option :
$$C = \mathbb{E}\left[ D_{0,T} (s-K)1_{s>K} |\mathcal{F_0}\right] $$
with $D_{0,T}=e^{-\int_0^Tr(u)du}$
I read somewhere that applying Itô gives :
$$dC = \mathbb{E} \left[d D_{0,T} (s-K)1_{s>K} |\mathcal{F_0}\right] $$
$$dC = \mathbb{E} \left[ \frac{dD_{0,T}}{dT} (S_T-K) 1_{S_T>K} dT+ D_{0,T} \frac{d}{ds} \left[ (s-K)1_{s>K} \right] \biggr\rvert_{s=S_T} dS_T + D_{0,T}\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{ds^2} \left[ (s-K)1_{s>K} \right] \biggr\rvert_{s=S_T} dS_T dS_T |\mathcal{F_0}\right] $$
My questions are :
1) Why the $d$ can be placed inside the $\mathbb{E} $? I mean why does this hold ? :
$$d\int D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s)ds=\int d \left[ D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s)\right]ds$$
2) when I look at this term : $D_{0,T} \frac{d}{ds} \left[ (s-K)1_{s>K} \right] \biggr\rvert_{s=S_T} dS_T$ I don't know where it comes from, because for me when I do apply Itô I get :
$$\int d \left[ D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s)\right]ds = \int \left[ (...)dT+\frac{d}{ds}\left[ D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s) \right]dS_T+\frac{1}{2}(...)dS_TdS_T \right] ds$$
focusing on the $\int \left[ \frac{d}{ds}\left[ D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s) \right]dS_T \right] ds$ part I get :
$$\int \left[ \frac{d}{ds}\left[ D_{0,T}(s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s) \right]dS_T \right] ds =\int D_{0,T} \left[ \frac{d}{ds}\left[ (s-K)1_{s>K}\phi_{S_T}(s) \right]dS_T \right] ds \mathbf{\mathbin{\color{red}\neq}} \int D_{0,T} \phi_{S_T}(s) \left[ \frac{d}{ds}\left[ (s-K)1_{s>K} \right]dS_T \right] ds = \mathbb{E}\left[ D_{0,T}\frac{d}{ds}\left[ (s-K)1_{s>K} \right]dS_T \right] $$
any help on this ?
3) isn't $T$ constant? maturity of the call option. Why do we find $dT$ in Itô as if it were the current time $t$ ? if we applied Itô to $C_t$ or $C(t,S_t)$ we would certainly find a $dt$ term and not a $dT$ one !
## Answer by Magic is in the chain (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/42161
Let me have a go at 1 and 2:
1)To understand this, recall that differentiation is a linear operation and interchanges with sum, and sum and integral are similar things. More broadly, if a function meets some technical conditions such as cont. derivatives and finiteness etc, then one can interchange differential and expectation, you will have to google the conditions. Now call option price is a nice function with continuous derivatives, so should meet those conditions. Dominated convergence theorem can help with the other condition.
2) This seems like just an application of Ito product rule. Letting $f=(s-k) 1_{s>k}$ and applying ito product rule $d (D f)=f \,dD +D \,df+0$ and substituting Ito Lemma $df=f_S dS+\frac{1}{2}f_{SS} dS^2$, gives 2. This is inside expectation so not sure if your point relates to some other steps further down the derivation chain.
3) See below comment from @Quantuple, which includes a reference as well.
Hope this helps.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.