Skip to content
All library documents

Arbitrage Limits on Mean-Reverting Models for Traded Asset Prices

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Aguazz

Summary

The document considers an optimal stopping problem in which the payoff depends on an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, then asks whether that process can represent a stock price. The response argues that under a risk-neutral, arbitrage-free model, discounted traded asset prices must satisfy a martingale condition. A mean-reverting drift for the asset price generally conflicts with that condition, unlike mean reversion in variables such as interest rates, which are not themselves traded asset prices.

The answer points to commodity prices as a possible setting where mean-reverting behavior may be useful because prices can show seasonality and other irregular features. It frames model choice as a compromise between theoretical consistency and observed behavior. The discussion is conceptual rather than a derivation of the stopping rule, and it does not specify a particular commodity model or treatment of risk premia. Its restriction applies to risk-neutral pricing assumptions; the document does not rule out mean-reverting statistical models for forecasting or other real-world purposes.

Key ideas

  • Risk-neutral prices of traded assets must satisfy discounted martingale conditions in an arbitrage-free framework.
  • A general mean-reverting drift in a stock or FX price is inconsistent with that framework.
  • Ornstein–Uhlenbeck dynamics are more naturally associated with non-traded variables such as interest rates.
  • Commodity prices may exhibit mean reversion and seasonality, though model design must balance realism and arbitrage consistency.

Tags

Full text
# American option under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stock price


# American option under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stock price












I came across with the following problem:

> For the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process $(X_t, 0\leq t\leq T)$ with initial condition $X_0 = x$, find the stopping time $\tau$ that maximizes $\mathbb{E}[e^{-r\tau}(S - X_\tau)^+]$, for $r\geq 0$ and $S > 0$.

I am aware that, if the process was a geometric Brownian motion instead of a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, that problem gets translated into the optimal exercising of an American put option, where $T$, $S$, and $r$ happen to be the maturity date, strike price, and discount rate (which is taken to be equal to the interest rate).

I wonder if the problem is still relevant from a financial perspective. I know that an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process could be used for modeling interest rates, and in that case, it is known as the Vasicek model or the Hull-White model, but the way it is used in the problem suggests that it models the stock price rather than the interest rate. One could argue that the problem may represent the optimal exercising of an American-style interest rate option, but still, the interest rate is already considered in the exponential discount.

I guess that the question could be boiled down to: Is an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process used to model stock prices? Can you think of a reasonable application of the problem described above?

Just in case, I leave here the dynamics of the Ornstein-Uhlenbec process: $$ \mathrm{d}X_t = a(b - X_t)\mathrm{d}t + c\mathrm{d}W_t, \quad X_0 = x,\quad a > 0, b \in \mathbb{R}, c > 0,\quad 0\leq t\leq T. $$

## Answer by Kurt G. (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/70004

If one insists on first principles then OU processes should be limited to variables that do not describe prices of trades assets. This limits OU to -as you say- interest rates for example.

A process that exhibits mean reversion under the risk-neutral measure cannot really be used to model the price process of an asset like a stock or an FX rate in an arbitrage-free model. That's because $$ S_te^{(\delta-r)t}\quad\text{ resp . }\quad X_te^{(r_f-r_d)\,t} $$ must be martingales which allows only SDEs $$ \frac{dS_t}{S_t}=(r-\delta)\,dt+\sigma\,dW_t\quad\text{ resp . }\quad\frac{dX_t}{X_t}=(r_f-r_d)\,dt+\sigma\,dW_t $$ I use here constant parameters only for simplicity. The point is that quite generally a mean reverting drift is not possible in these equations. At least not under the risk-neutral measure if one insists on a school book arbitrage free model.

Having said that: It is quite possible that there are asset classes that are badly described by such SDEs. Commodity prices could be such which exhibit all kinds of weird features such as seasonality, perhaps even mean reversion.

In the end the model will be a best practice compromise between first principles and realistic behaviour.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.