Skip to content
All library documents

Building an Options Market: Volatility, Price Discovery, and Two-Way Flow

Article Quant Q&A · Author: FISR

Summary

The document distinguishes joining an established options market from creating a new or illiquid one. In a functioning market, a new participant mainly provides liquidity, with the pricing model chosen to suit the product. When developing a market, the answer recommends studying the underlying’s liquidity and realized volatility to estimate where implied volatility might emerge, then considering the volatility term structure and using inter-dealer price runs to support price discovery. Prospective demand, supply, open interest, and correlated options markets can also inform initial quotes.

The answer emphasizes that market-making is shaped by actual flow and necessity. One-sided quoting can impede a young market’s survival, so two-way flow matters. It also argues that market-makers generally adjust quotes based on underlying performance and supply and demand rather than forecasting volatility; forward volatility is inferred from the current volatility term structure but has its own market dynamics. The discussion focuses on at-the-money volatility in vanilla options. Establishing skew and off-strike pricing is identified as a separate, more complex problem, and no quantitative quoting model is provided.

Key ideas

  • For a new options market, begin with the underlying’s liquidity and historical realized volatility.
  • Use volatility term structure, price discovery, client demand, and open interest to inform initial quotes.
  • A correlated options market can provide a useful reference for implied and realized volatility levels.
  • Two-way flow supports the development and persistence of a young market.
  • The discussion treats at-the-money vanilla options; skew and off-strike pricing require separate analysis.

Tags

Full text
# Options market making process (step-by-step)


# Options market making process (step-by-step)












What are the steps involved in options market making?

Does it roughly follow this procedure:

- Choose a pricing model, e.g. Black-Scholes.

- Calibrate the model, e.g. Volatility.

- Quote a bid-ask spread for the option.

- Trade (which results in a net long/short position).

- Compute the Greeks to hedge the position.

- Repeat.

It seems to me that an important remaining factor would be forecasting volatility once the position is delta hedged?

Thank you in advance!

## Answer by user35980 (score 6, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/76626

It's not clear from the question, but there are two scenarios:

1/ you have an actively traded and well-established options market in which you're going to get involved as a new participant and take on risk;

2/ you're establishing a new options market which is either non-existent or very illiquid.

In 1/ all you're really doing is providing liquidity. The more interesting question is referring to 2/. The steps you describe (with the exception of 3.) are in a sense posteriori. So if your question was only related to 1/ you can stop reading here! Btw model choice is relevant to the product being quoted. Let's stick to vanilla options (so just Black-Scholes).

In 2/ the key objectives are to understand the liquidity/flow of the underlying and analyze its historical realized volatility. This allows one to get a sense of where implied volatility, if it existed, may be. Next, some idea of the term structure of the vols is necessary i.e. how the vols vary with expiry. This is usually followed by price discovery (done in an inter-dealer setting showing out vanilla price runs), establishing demand/supply, open interest from prospective clients... etc. All of this derives from the dynamics of the underlying that you intend to quote the options on, as this is the only data you have to work with. Having a proxy market for options in another underlying which is strongly correlated to the one you intend to establish your new options market on is also very useful. Particularly to get an idea of a realized/implied vol spread (implieds usually trade over).

Market-making (as described above) is not exact science and is driven by necessity (demand/supply). This sometimes has an unfortunate side-effect in many younger options markets being very one sided (e.g. bid only). This is a huge drawback as things never really get off the ground and the market just dies. Having two-way flow is essential to the survival of a market.

Finally, options market-makers don't "forecast volatility": I'm not sure how one would even go about doing that. There is a notion of forward volatility which can be deduced from the term structure of the current spot volatilities. But this is in itself a separate market which has its own dynamics. The dynamics of the spot vols are driven by how much the underlying delivers as a well as demand/supply, and market-makers adjust their quotes primarily in accordance with these factors.

Edit: I should mention that all of the above discussion is only with respect to ATM vols. Establishing skew and off-strike vols is a whole other world of hurt, which I'll leave for another day.

## Answer by Mina Shiri (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/80548

Thanks for the question and complete answer you two provided. I have some simple questions because they made it hard for me to understand the text compeletely. first of all, what do you mean by "vols"? does it reffer to volatility?

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.