Skip to content
All library documents

Calculating Portfolio Returns and Compounded Performance

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Tyler D

Summary

This explanation distinguishes portfolio returns, cumulative sums, and compounded performance. It first defines each asset’s simple return from adjusted prices, accounting for events such as dividends and stock splits. To calculate a value-weighted portfolio return for a period, it pairs that period’s asset returns with portfolio weights based on market values from the preceding period. The example in the question uses equal weights, but the answer explains the value-weighted case.

The cumulative sum adds portfolio returns across periods, while compounded performance multiplies one plus each period’s return. The compounded series represents the growth of an initial investment under reinvestment, whereas a sum of returns is easier to compare on a consistent scale over time. The cited discussion notes that compounded-value charts can appear more volatile later in a sample because the investment base has grown. These measures answer different questions; correct results depend on using appropriate returns and weights, and the exposition does not cover rebalancing costs or other implementation details.

Key ideas

  • Calculate simple asset returns from prices adjusted for splits, dividends, and similar events.
  • For value weighting, match each period’s returns with weights derived from the prior period’s market values.
  • A cumulative sum adds portfolio returns; compounded performance multiplies one plus each return.
  • Compounded performance describes investment growth with reinvestment, while cumulative sums use a different scale.
  • A compounded chart can show larger absolute moves later as the investment base grows.

Tags

Full text
# How to compute cumulative performance of a portfolio with two equities?


# How to compute cumulative performance of a portfolio with two equities?












I have a time series of adjusted returns for two companies, A and B. I have created a portfolio consisting of these two time series with equal weighting (sum of weights must equal 1):

$w_a = w_b=0.5$

Now, I want to compute the cumulative performance of my portfolio as a function of time:

For each time $t_i$, I compute the return $R_i = (P_i-P_{i-1}) / P_{i-1}$, where $P_i$ is the weighted adjusted return at time $i$, i.e.

$$ P_i = 0.5\times (\text{adjusted-return(A)} + \text{adjusted-return(B)}) $$

At a given time $t_i$, I then find the cumulative performance $CP$ as

$$ CP_i = (1+P_1)(1+P_2)(1+P_3)\cdots (1+P_i) $$

Is this correct?

## Answer by skoestlmeier (score 1, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/44124

#### Preliminary calculations

Consider a $n \times 1$ vector of asset returns $r_{it}$ for each time $t$, where each of it is calculated as

$$r_{it} = \frac{P_{it} - P_{it-1}}{P_{it-1}}$$

i.e. simple returns, where stock prices $P_{it}$ should be adjusted for stock splits, dividends, etc.

For calculating value weighted returns $r_{t}^{val}$ for each time $t$, you also need a $n \times 1$ vector of weights $w_i$ for each stock $i$, with $$w_{it} = \frac{MV_{it-1}}{\sum_{j=1}^n MV_{jt-1}}$$ where $MV_i$ denotes the market value of company $i$ and $n$ the total amount of stocks you are considering in your portfolio. Be aware, that you match returns of month $t$ with market values of the previous period $t-1$.

The value-weighted portfolio return $r_{pt}^{val}$ is calculated by $$r_{pt}^{val} = w_{it}' r_{it}$$ where $w_{it}'$ denotes the transposed vector of $w_{it}$.

#### Cumulative vs. compounded returns

Be aware of the difference of cumulative ($r_t^{cum}$) and compounded ($r_t^{com}$) returns. Both are calculated as: $$r_t^{cum} = \sum_{i=1}^t r_{pi}^{val}$$ $$r_t^{com} = \prod_{i=1}^t \left( 1+r_{pi}^{val} \right)$$

The cumulative return for month $t$ is calculated as the sum of monthly value-weighted portfolio returns from the first period of time up to (and including) the given month $t$.

The compounded return for month $t$ is calculated as the cumulative product of one plus the monthly value-weighted portfolio returns from the first period of time up to (and including) the given month $t$.

Bali/Engle/Murray (2016) state (p. 118/119):

> [...] the compounded return gives an indiction of how much money would have been made [...] by an investor who invested one dollar in the portfolio at the end of the (first period of time). The line representing this value is in some ways misleading, as a quick glance at the solid line would seem to indicate that the returns were much more volatile toward the end of the sample period than at the beginning. This result is simply due to the scale however, as the same percentage gain or loss is indicated by a larger vertical distance on the chart for the more recent periods, as the cumulative returns are larger toward the end to the sample period than at the beginning of the sample period. The cumulative sum of returns does not suffer from this drawback, but the interpretation of the values on the sum of returns scale is not as simple as those on the compounded returns scale.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.