Calibrating Rate Models to Price Bermudan Swaptions
Summary
The response explains why a volatility surface matters when pricing a Bermudan swaption, an option exercisable on specified dates. It first clarifies that a Bermudan contract need not be exercisable from the beginning of its life, then outlines a model-based pricing workflow: choose a framework for the evolution of interest rates, calibrate it to prices of related swaptions, and use the calibrated model to price the Bermudan through a lattice.
The model choice determines which parameters require calibration. In a Libor Market Model, for example, the setup includes assumptions about forward-rate volatility and correlations among the driving factors; the volatility surface informs the volatility assigned to different forward rates. The answer lists several possible rate-model families but does not compare their performance or provide a worked calibration. It also reflects the respondent’s recollection of older practice and acknowledges that newer approaches may exist, so it is a conceptual outline rather than current implementation guidance.
Key ideas
- Bermudan swaptions have exercise opportunities on specified dates and need not be exercisable immediately.
- A rate model describes how interest rates or forward rates evolve through time.
- Calibration to prices of related swaptions sets model parameters before pricing the Bermudan.
- In a Libor Market Model, the volatility surface informs forward-rate volatility assumptions, alongside correlations.
Tags
Full text
# Why future (forward) volatility smile is important to path dependent option? # Why future (forward) volatility smile is important to path dependent option? I was wondering why future volatility smile is important to path dependent option and American type option such as Bermudan swaption. It would be best if someone could provide a reference article as well. Thanks! ## Answer by Matt Wolf (score 3) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/17202 First of all, a Bermudan Swaption does not have to be of American type. Consider a "9NC2 Bermudan" (9 non call 2), basically a Bermudan swaption with final maturity in 9 years which is not exercisable for the first 2 years. I have not worked at an exotic rates desk in a while (many years to be more precise) but from what I remember you need to use a lattice tree model to describe the evolution of interest rates. One can evolve such rates via a number different models such as HW, Gaussian 2-factor, Libor Market Model (possibly with SABR style stochastic volatility model), Black's model, among others. Some are short-rate models, others evolve discrete forward rates (such as LMM). I am not knowledgeable of newer approaches if they exist. When you calibrate your model to match the prices of other swaptions (those that are co-terminal with your Bermudan) the choice of model will basically determine which parameters you calibrate for. In the example of the Libor Market Model you need to also choose how to model volatility (volatility of forward rates) and correlations between the driving Brownian Motions. This is where your volatility surface comes into play. The volatility surface you derive during your calibration exercise describes the volatility of different forward rates. Once the calibration step is complete you can then iterate the lattice to price your Bermudan option.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.