Skip to content
All library documents

Calibrating Stochastic Local Volatility Models for Vanilla and Exotic Pricing

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Michael

Summary

The document discusses calibration and pricing for stochastic local volatility models, using Heston SLV as an example. It questions whether a local volatility surface can first be inferred from vanilla options, while stochastic volatility parameters such as volatility of volatility and mean-reversion speed are chosen separately from market quotes or historical data. The answer says the local volatility function must instead be calibrated conditional on the chosen stochastic-volatility parameters if the model is to reproduce the vanilla options used for calibration.

It outlines a rough foreign-exchange workflow: fit a Heston model to a small set of vanilla options, adjust volatility of volatility using information from a liquid first-generation exotic, then recalibrate the local volatility component to match a broader set of vanillas before pricing the target payoff. The explanation points to a conditional-expectation interpretation of local volatility and the forward equation for the distribution. It is a high-level recipe, not a full algorithm, and it does not specify parameter estimates or discuss calibration robustness for less liquid underlyings.

Key ideas

  • The local volatility function should be calibrated jointly in context with the selected stochastic-volatility parameters.
  • A rough workflow first fits Heston to a limited set of vanilla options.
  • Liquid exotic prices can inform adjustments to volatility of volatility.
  • The local volatility component can then be tuned to reproduce a broader vanilla set.
  • The answer cites conditional expectation and the forward distribution equation as conceptual foundations.

Tags

Full text
# Calibration and pricing with the Stochastic Local Volatility model


# Calibration and pricing with the Stochastic Local Volatility model












I'm reading the stochastic local volatility model literature, e.g., the Heston Stochastic Local Volatility model (https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/22747/22747D.pdf); but I'm a bit unsure about its calibration and pricing.

It seems to me that the calibration and pricing of an LSV model consist of the following steps:

- Use all the vanilla options to back out the local volatility surface (implied vol -> vol parametrization -> interpolation/extrapolation -> Dupire local vol).

- Choose whatever values you feel comfortable for the additional and exogenous model paramters, e.g., vov, mean-reverting speed etc.

- Generate MC paths to price whatever payoffs.

My question is about step #2: Since the Heston SLV is not a complete model, due to the fact that the additional and exogenous model parameters are not directly tradable, say, I know that for SPX vov, I can go to the VIX options market, but usually we don't have one for a single name. So, how do we decide the values for the model paramters? Do I go back and grab historical data to have a good guess and betting against the market?

## Answer by river_rat (score 4, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/70603

You need to calibrate the local volatility function contingent with the stochastic volatility parameters you chose if you want to be able to price back the calibration vanillas. The standard recipe for fx is as follows. Roughly calibrate Heston to a small set of vanilla options. Adjust the vol of vol parameter resulting from that calibration up or down to capture information from some first generation liquid exotic you are interested in (like double no touch options). Use the local volatility function to now fix the calibration so that you can now capture accurately some larger set of vanilla options. Price what you are interested in. The magic ingredients are the conditional expectation view of local volatility and the fwd equation for the distribution function.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.