Causal DML for Estimating the Variance Risk Premium’s Effect on Option Returns
Summary
This notebook declares and runs a double machine learning analysis of the variance risk premium’s effect on S&P 500 option returns to expiry. It makes the estimand, observed timing, confounders, temporal cross-validation setup, nuisance model, HAC covariance design, and placebo refutation method visible before execution. The resolved request is run only after preview reductions are specified when using preview mode, and the notebook checks that the result is complete and matches the planned identity.
The notebook also documents a change in its placebo comparison: it now compares HAC t-statistics rather than raw effect estimates, because block permutation can alter treatment residual variance and make placebo effects misleadingly narrow. It cites a prior result as motivation, but its stated role is to validate and publish the computation, not interpret the new causal estimate. Causal conclusions therefore require the separate analysis step, and remain dependent on the specified controls, timing assumptions, and refutation design.
Key ideas
- The analysis estimates a causal effect of the variance risk premium on returns to option expiry.
- The notebook exposes the estimand, timing, confounders, folds, covariance method, and placebo design before running.
- Comparing HAC t-statistics in placebo refutation addresses variance differences caused by treatment permutation.
- A result must be complete and match the resolved request identity before publication.
- This execution notebook hands off estimates for separate interpretation and does not itself claim a new empirical conclusion.
Tags
Full text
# 10_causal_dml.py
```py
# ---
# jupyter:
# jupytext:
# cell_metadata_filter: tags,-all
# text_representation:
# extension: .py
# format_name: percent
# format_version: '1.3'
# jupytext_version: 1.19.3
# kernelspec:
# display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel)
# language: python
# name: python3
# ---
# %% [markdown]
# # S&P 500 Options: Causal DML Execution
#
# This notebook estimates the effect of the variance-risk-premium treatment on the
# return-to-expiry outcome. It declares the request through the shared causal boundary and exposes
# the resolved estimand, timing, confounders, nuisance model, covariance design, and refutation
# protocol before execution.
#
# `11_model_analysis` interprets the causal estimates. This notebook validates the computation
# and publishes its artifact only.
#
# Prerequisites: `03_financial_features`, `04_model_based_features`, and `05_evaluation`.
# %%
"""Execute the declared S&P 500 options causal DML request."""
import polars as pl
from case_studies.research import causal_supersedes
from case_studies.sp500_options.research_workflow import open_study
# %% tags=["parameters"]
EXECUTION_TIER = "canonical"
WORKSPACE: str = ""
PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS: dict = {}
# Retired by this run: the block-permutation refutation now compares the HAC t-statistic
# rather than the raw effect, so CAUSAL_RUNNER_VERSION moved and every causal identity with
# it. The rows named here hold a p-value computed on the shrunken placebo effects; this run
# supersedes them rather than correcting them, because the statistic is different, not the
# arithmetic. Read out of each registry's current canonical identity per label, 2026-09-10.
SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL: str = "d034b82943c5"
# %% [markdown]
# ## Declared and resolved request
#
# A preview must declare all sample, symbol, fold, or placebo reductions. Canonical execution uses
# the complete pre-holdout analysis population.
#
# ### What `SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL` retires here
#
# `CausalResult.one` resolves a label to exactly one canonical identity, so a refit has to name the
# identity it replaces or the registry is left with two and refuses. The retired identity is
# `d034b82943c5`.
#
# What changed is the refutation statistic, not the fit. The placebo loop used to compare each
# permuted run's *effect estimate* against the observed effect. Block-permuting the treatment frees
# it from the controls, so the first stage can no longer predict it and its residual keeps nearly
# all its variance. That residual variance is the whole denominator of the second-stage effect, so
# every placebo effect is divided by a larger number than the observed one and the placebo
# distribution comes out narrower than the null it stands for. The bias runs one way, toward a
# refutation that reads as passed. The comparison is now on the HAC t-statistic, which carries the
# denominator in it and cancels the inflation.
#
# The retired identity fitted the same 166,105 observations and reported the same effect of 0.4098
# with a HAC standard error of 0.3509, so p = 0.243 under either statistic. Its refutation p was
# 0.0099, the smallest value 100 draws can report, for an effect whose own t-statistic is 1.17.
# Sitting at that floor is the signature. This notebook registers and hands off; the new row is
# read and interpreted in `11_model_analysis`.
# %%
study = open_study(execution_tier=EXECUTION_TIER, workspace=WORKSPACE or None)
request_table = pl.DataFrame(
{
"method": ["dml"],
"label": ["ret_to_expiry"],
"config_name": ["dml"],
"execution_tier": [EXECUTION_TIER],
}
)
request_table
# %%
request = study.causal(
**request_table.row(0, named=True),
preview_reductions=PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS,
supersedes=causal_supersedes(
study,
SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL,
"ret_to_expiry",
labels=["ret_to_expiry"],
execution_tier=EXECUTION_TIER,
),
)
resolved = request.resolve()
computation = resolved.spec["computation"]
estimand = computation["estimand"]
causal_plan = pl.DataFrame(
{
"treatment": [estimand["treatment"]],
"outcome": [estimand["outcome"]],
"confounders": [", ".join(estimand["confounders"])],
"treatment_observed_at": [estimand["treatment_observed_at"]],
"outcome_horizon": [estimand["outcome_horizon"]],
"folds": [computation["cv"]["n_folds"]],
"embargo_periods": [computation["cv"]["embargo_periods"]],
"nuisance_model": [computation["model"]["class"]],
"covariance": ["HAC with the outcome horizon"],
"placebo_method": [computation["refutation"]["method"]],
"placebo_block": [computation["refutation"]["block_size"]],
"placebo_block_basis": [computation["refutation"]["block_size_basis"]],
"analysis_rows": [computation["analysis_population"]["n_rows"]],
"training_hash": [resolved.identity],
}
)
causal_plan
# %% [markdown]
# ## Execute and validate
#
# The shared DML runner fails on missing confounders, invalid temporal folds, incomplete nuisance
# fits, or a non-finite HAC standard error. A cached result must match the complete resolved
# identity before it can be reused.
# %%
if EXECUTION_TIER == "preview" and (not WORKSPACE or not PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS):
raise ValueError("preview execution requires WORKSPACE and PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS")
result = resolved.run()
if not result.complete or result.hash != resolved.identity:
raise RuntimeError("causal execution did not publish the complete resolved request")
# %% tags=["results"]
artifact = pl.DataFrame(
{
"causal_hash": [result.hash],
"label": [resolved.spec["label"]],
"execution_tier": [result.execution_tier],
"complete": [result.complete],
}
)
artifact
# %% [markdown]
# The registered causal artifact is the handoff to `11_model_analysis`. No estimate or empirical
# conclusion is interpreted here.
```Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: MIT
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.