Skip to content
All library documents

Choosing Blockchain and Crypto Data APIs for Trading and DeFi

Article Amberdata research

Summary

This article compares the data needs of crypto wallets, investors and traders, and decentralized applications. It explains that products may need blockchain balances, transaction histories, token transfers, contract events, and market prices or order books. Developers can obtain chain data through APIs and node connections, while aggregating data across chains and combining it with market context may require additional services. Real-time feeds such as WebSockets are discussed for block, transaction, and contract events.

For traders, the article identifies historical and live order-book data alongside blockchain transaction data as inputs to research and strategy backtesting. It also describes a latency comparison across several providers and read endpoints, but the supplied text omits the actual measurements. The comparison used at least ten requests per endpoint at roughly one request per second and did not test write operations. The piece is partly a vendor comparison and promotes one provider, so its provider recommendations are not independent evidence; API choice should be evaluated against a product’s data coverage, latency, reliability, and service requirements.

Key ideas

  • Crypto trading research may combine order-book data with blockchain transactions and transfers.
  • Historical market data is needed to backtest algorithmic strategies.
  • Wallets and dApps may need balances, activity histories, token data, and real-time contract events.
  • APIs and WebSockets provide ways to retrieve blockchain data and receive updates.
  • The article describes latency tests but provides no figures in the supplied text, and its vendor comparisons are promotional.

Tags

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.