Citigroup’s Historical Insolvency Episodes and Government Bailouts

Summary

This discussion examines a claim that Citigroup, including predecessor institutions, faced insolvency three times: during the early 1980s emerging-market debt crisis, amid commercial real estate losses near the end of that decade, and during the 2008–2009 financial crisis. The accepted response, from a former employee, supports the claim and says taxpayer-backed bailouts prevented liquidation. Another reply points readers to an FDIC history of the savings and loan era for context on the Latin American debt crisis.

The exchange offers a brief historical account rather than a detailed analysis of balance sheets, rescue mechanisms, or the distinction between a liquidity crisis and insolvency. It provides a useful reminder that large financial institutions can depend on public intervention during severe credit losses, but the claims in the thread are not independently substantiated with figures or primary documents. The discussion is therefore a starting point for studying bank credit risk and crisis history, not a complete record of each episode.

Key ideas

• The thread attributes three insolvency episodes to Citigroup or its predecessor institutions.
• The episodes are associated with emerging-market debt, commercial real estate, and the global financial crisis.
• A respondent says taxpayer bailouts prevented liquidation during these episodes.
• The exchange points to FDIC historical material for context on the early 1980s debt crisis.
• The post provides limited evidence and does not detail the institutions’ financial condition or rescue terms.

Tags

# Did Citigroup really fail three times in the last 40 years?


# Did Citigroup really fail three times in the last 40 years?












I watched a speech by Simon Johnson at UCSB and, at one point, he claimed that Citigroup has failed three times since the 1980s. For example, he claims that Citigroup failed and was saved by the government in 1982 because of "bad loans made in emerging markets". The second such failure is at the end of the 1980s because of "bad loans to commercial real estate". The third is of course the 2008/2009 financial crisis.

What strikes me as odd is that the first two alleged failures are not mentioned in Wikipedia on Citigroup! He doesn't appear to me as a crackpot as he is the former chief economist of IMF and effective whitewashing of the US's biggest bank holding company on Wikipedia is as unlikely. Does anyone know what affairs is he referencing?

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 31, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/54364

(I worked there for 23 years.)

Simon Johnson is correct. Citi (or its predecessors) was insolvent on those 3 occasions, and would have gone into liquidation without the bailouts by U.S. taxpayers.

## Answer by user42108 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/58853

For 1982, I suggest you read the FDIC's "History of the 80s". Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 5 covers the "LDC Crisis" (EM Crisis in contemporary parlance, though it was mostly Latam).

https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/history/

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.