Combining Asset Betas to Find Portfolio Beta and Market Correlation
Summary
The document explains how to find the beta of a portfolio made from three risky assets when each asset’s beta and portfolio weight are known. The portfolio beta is the weighted average of the component betas. Using the values in the question, the accepted answer obtains a portfolio beta of 1.15. It then relates beta to correlation by multiplying beta by the ratio of market volatility to portfolio volatility, producing a correlation of about 0.93.
The response also clarifies that portfolio variance can be separated into the market-related component, calculated from portfolio beta and market volatility, and idiosyncratic risk. This explains why the individual asset covariances and volatilities are not needed for the requested aggregate relationship. The calculation assumes the usual beta definition relative to the stated market portfolio and uses the portfolio volatility supplied in the question; it does not derive that volatility from the component assets or discuss estimation error.
Key ideas
- A portfolio’s beta is the weighted average of its component asset betas.
- Portfolio beta and the relative volatilities determine correlation with the market.
- Portfolio variance includes a market-related component and idiosyncratic risk.
- The calculation uses the portfolio volatility provided rather than estimating it from the asset covariance matrix.
Tags
Full text
# Market portfolio and portfolio with three risky assets
# Market portfolio and portfolio with three risky assets
I'm trying to solve a problem with portfolios, but I cannot get to the solution. There are three risky assets A, B and C whose betas are respectively 0.6 (A), 1.5 (B) and 1.1 (C). Besides, we know there's a risk-free asset with a 1% return. The market portfolio has a 5% return and a volatility of 13%.
I am asked to find the $\beta$ and the correlation between the market portfolio and the portfolio given by the combination of assets A, B and C, whose weights are respectively 30% (A), 50% (B) and 20% (C). This portfolio has a volatility of 16%.
I tried to use the data on the betas and the volatility of the market portfolio to find the covariance between the risky assets and the market, but this doesn't help me. In fact, I always miss one value to apply the formulas such as:
> $\sigma_p^2=w_a^2\sigma_a^2+w_b^2\sigma_b^2+w_c^2\sigma_c^2+2w_aw_bCov(a,b)+2w_aw_cCov(a,c)+2w_bw_cCov(b,c)$ $Cov(a,m)=\rho_{a,m}\sigma_a\sigma_m$
So far, I computed the values of the Covariance of A, B and C with the market using the definition of beta:
> $\beta_a=Cov(a,m)/\sigma_m^2 , \\Cov(a,m)=0.010, \\Cov(b,m)=0.025, \\Cov(c,m)=0.019$
What do I miss to find the $\beta$ between the market and the portfolio and their correlation?
Thanks in advance for your help!
## Answer by phdstudent (score 4, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/74472
$\beta_{portfolio} = 0.6 \times 0.3 + 1.5 \times 0.5 + 1.1 \times 0.2 = 1.15$
$\rho_{portfolio,market} = 1.15 \times \frac{0.13}{0.16} = 0.93$
Edit: To reply to the comment: $\sigma^2_{port} = \beta_{port}^2 \sigma_m^2 + Idiosyncratic risk$
So just do $\frac{\beta_{port}^2 \sigma_m^2}{\sigma^2_{port}}$Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.