Completeness and Uniqueness of the Risk-Neutral Measure in Black–Scholes

# Unique risk neutral measure for Brownian Motion


# Unique risk neutral measure for Brownian Motion












For a standard geometric Brownian motion model of stock prices: $$ dS = a S dt + \sigma S dZ$$ we can transform the process to be under risk neutral measure: $$ dS = r S dt + \sigma S d \tilde{Z}$$ and from the references I found, this risk neutral measure is "unique".

If we make a transform, say $$ dS = r S dt + \tau S d \hat{Z}$$ where $\tau$ is different from $\sigma$, this equation gives the correct price of stock. but Black-Scholes equation will fail as we have changed volatility.

However, for a discrete model, e.g. a tree model, if there are $n$ states of world, then we need $n-1$ assets plus cash to uniquely pin down risk neutral measure.

Question:The Brownian motion model in effect has infinite number of states and only one asset, then where does uniqueness of risk neutral measure come from?

## Answer by Gordon (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/18479

The uniqueness of the risk-neutral measure comes from the abundance of tradable assets. Let $B_t$ be the money-market account at time $t$. Let $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ be two risk-neutral measures. Then, for any tradable asset $X$ with maturity $T$, \begin{align*} E^{Q_1}\left(\frac{X_T}{B_T}\right) &= E^{Q_2}\left(\frac{X_T}{B_T}\right)\\ &=\frac{X_0}{B_0}. \end{align*} For any $A\in \mathcal{F}_T$, we define an asset with payoff $$\mathbb{I}_{A} B_T.$$ Note that, this deal may not be exchange traded, however, it can be made over-the-counter. Then \begin{align*} Q_1(A) &= E^{Q_1}\left(\frac{\mathbb{I}_{A} B_T}{B_T}\right)\\ &= E^{Q_2}\left(\frac{\mathbb{I}_{A} B_T}{B_T}\right)\\ &= Q_2(A). \end{align*} That is, $Q_1=Q_2$.

## Answer by Mark Joshi (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/18464

essentially it comes down the fact that the dyadic quadratic variation of $W_t$ is $t$ with probability 1 and any measure change has to preserve this fact. Changing volatility would violate this invariance.

## Answer by user16651 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/18503

Let M denote the number of underlying traded assets in the model excluding the risk free asset, and let R denote the number of random sources. Generically we then have the following relations: 1. The model is arbitrage free if and only if M ≤ R. 2. The model is complete if and only if M ≥ R. 3. The model is complete and arbitrage free if and only if M = R. Black Scholes Model is Complete and arbitrage free then risk-neutral measure is unique.