Computing VaR with Gamma-Distributed Volatility
Summary
The document asks how to calculate a portfolio’s 99% value at risk when returns are normal conditional on volatility, but volatility itself follows a gamma distribution. It contrasts this setup with the familiar normal VaR calculation based on fixed volatility and points toward a Bayesian mixture approach.
The response suggests using conjugate priors for a normal distribution with known mean, under which integrating over uncertain dispersion produces a Student-t return distribution with an updated dispersion parameter. VaR can then be obtained from the corresponding tail quantile. The document does not derive the parameter update, give a numerical procedure, or report a worked example, so the exact result depends on specifying the distribution parameterization and the relationship between gamma volatility and normal variance. Those details need verification before applying the suggestion to a portfolio.
Key ideas
- Uncertain volatility can be modeled by mixing conditional normal return distributions over a volatility distribution.
- The response links this mixture to conjugate-prior results for a normal model with known mean.
- It suggests a Student-t predictive return distribution and using its tail quantile for VaR.
- The document gives no derivation or example, and the precise parameter mapping is left unspecified.
Tags
Full text
# Value at Risk (VaR): Normal distribution with gamma distributed volatility
# Value at Risk (VaR): Normal distribution with gamma distributed volatility
If I was to do a 99% VaR calculation on a portfolio with normally distributed returns $\mathcal{N} (\mu,\sigma)$, the 99% VaR would be $\mu - 2.33\sigma$.
Instead of having a constant volatility, let's say volatility is gamma distributed, i.e. $\sigma \sim \Gamma(k, \theta)$.
Explain in as many details as possible (either derive a formula or explain a numerical solution using a computer program) how to compute the VaR of the portfolio when returns have a normal distribution conditional on sigma, and sigma is distributed according to a gamma distribution.
## Answer by Kermittfrog (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/53076
You might want to have a look at the conjugate priors to the normal distribution (with known mean) Your setup will result in a $t$-distributed return with updated dispersion parameter.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.