Skip to content
All library documents

Conditional Brownian Expectations from the Normal Density

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Lars Ericson

Summary

The document derives the conditional expectation of a Brownian-motion value at a later time, given the natural filtration at an earlier time, as an integral. Brownian increments after the conditioning time are independent of the past and normally distributed with variance equal to the elapsed time. Consequently, the later value has a conditional normal distribution centered at the currently observed Brownian value.

Integrating the variable against this conditional density gives the requested expression. Splitting the integrand into its centered part and the known current value shows that the centered part integrates to zero by symmetry, while the density integrates to one. The conditional expectation is therefore the observed value at the earlier time, consistent with Brownian motion’s martingale property. The explanation assumes standard Brownian motion and its natural filtration; it does not address more general filtrations, drifted processes, or cases where the conditioning information changes the increment distribution.

Key ideas

  • A Brownian increment after time s is independent of the natural filtration through s.
  • Conditioned on the past, the later Brownian value is normal with mean W_s and variance t−s.
  • Integrating the conditional density yields W_s because the centered component has mean zero.
  • The conditional density contributes unit mass to the known current value.
  • The derivation assumes standard Brownian motion and its natural filtration.

Tags

Full text
# Write expectation of brownian motion conditional on filtration as an integral?


# Write expectation of brownian motion conditional on filtration as an integral?












Let $W_t$ be a Brownian motion, so $W_t=z_t \sqrt{t}$ where $z_t \in N(0,1)$ and the pdf of $z$ is $f(z)=\frac{e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$. So

$$E(W_t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} W_t f(z) dz =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} z \sqrt{t} \frac{e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} dz =\int_{0}^{\infty} (z+(-z)) \sqrt{t} \frac{e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} dz=0$$

Now suppose ${\cal F}_t$ is the natural filtration for $W_t$. By construction of Brownian motion, we are given that $E(W_t|{\cal F}_s)=W_s, 0\leq s\leq t$.

Question: How do I write $E(W_t|{\cal F}_s)$ as a Riemann integral expression similar to the Riemann integral expression of $E(W_t)$ given above?

Note: I have done extensive Google search on this, without finding any responsive exposition. If this question is beside the point, please explain why. If it's on point, please answer with the Riemann integral expression.

Note: Cross-posted.

## Answer by Quantuple (score 1, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/36622

Let $(W_t)_{t \geq 0}$ denote a standard Brownian motion and $\Bbb{F}=\{\mathcal{F}_t\}_{t \geq 0}$ the natural filtration it generates over some probability space $(\Omega, \Bbb{P})$.

By definition, we know that $$\forall 0 < s < t, W_t - W_s \sim \sqrt{t-s}\, N(0, 1)$$ under $\Bbb{P}$.

Noting that $W_t = (W_t - W_s) + W_s$ and conditioning on the knowledge of $\mathcal{F}_s$ we could further write that $$ W_t \vert \mathcal{F}_s \sim N(W_s, t-s)$$

Such that \begin{align} \Bbb{E}[W_t \vert \mathcal{F}_s] &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} W_t p(W_t\vert\mathcal{F}_s) dW_t \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi(t-s)}}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{x - W_s}{\sqrt{t-s}}\right)^2\right) dx \tag{A}\\ &= \underbrace{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} (x - W_s) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi(t-s)}}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{x - W_s}{\sqrt{t-s}}\right)^2\right) dx}_{=0} \dots \\ & \dots + W_s \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\underbrace{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi(t-s)}}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{x - W_s}{\sqrt{t-s}}\right)^2\right) dx}_{=1} \\ &= W_s \end{align} where $(A)$ is the result you're looking for.

Note that this is basically the hand-wavy way of writing: \begin{align} \Bbb{E}[W_t \vert \mathcal{F}_s] &= \Bbb{E}[W_t -W_s + W_s \vert \mathcal{F}_s] \\ &= \Bbb{E}[W_t -W_s \vert \mathcal{F}_s] + \Bbb{E}[ W_s \vert \mathcal{F}_s] \\ &= 0 + W_s = W_s \end{align}

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.