Skip to content
All library documents

Conditional Expectation of a Deterministic Stochastic Integral

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Gabriele Pompa

Summary

The document studies the conditional expectation of an Itô integral with a deterministic integrand, given the terminal value of a standard Wiener process. It first frames the integral as a martingale with normally distributed values and asks whether its increments are independent. The responses then derive the conditional expectation using the Brownian bridge identity for an intermediate Wiener value conditioned on its terminal value.

Both derivations arrive at a result proportional to the terminal Wiener value, with the proportionality determined by the integral of the deterministic integrand up to the intermediate time and divided by the terminal time. One uses the defining sums for the Itô integral; the other applies Itô's lemma and integration by parts. The answers explicitly express uncertainty, and the discussion does not fully resolve the preliminary claims about independent increments and covariance. The derivation assumes a sufficiently regular deterministic integrand.

Key ideas

  • For a deterministic integrand, the integral can be approximated by weighted increments of the Wiener process.
  • Conditioning Wiener values on the terminal value uses the Brownian bridge relationship.
  • The proposed conditional expectation scales the terminal Wiener value by the integrand's time integral divided by the terminal time.
  • The same result is derived using Itô sums and, alternatively, Itô's lemma with integration by parts.
  • The responses flag uncertainty and do not settle every preliminary claim in the question.

Tags

Full text
# conditional expectation of stochastic integral


# conditional expectation of stochastic integral












let $M_t$ be the following stochastic integral

$$ M_t = \int_0^t \sigma_s dW_s $$

where $\sigma_t$ is a sufficiently regular deterministic function and $W_t$ is a standard Wiener process (that is $W_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0,t)$ with independent increments).

It can be shown that $M_t$ is martingale with distribution $M_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \Sigma_t)$ where (Ito's isometry) I have defined the variance

$$ \Sigma_t = \int_0^t \sigma^2_s ds $$

Could you kindly check if the following two preliminary assertions are true (everywhere $0 \leq s<t<T$):

- $M_t$ has independent increments, that is $M_s$ is independent from $M_t - M_s$.



Proof of 2.: If 1. holds, reasoning as in the Wiener case: \begin{align} {\mathbb E}[M_t M_s] &= {\mathbb E}[(M_t - M_s + M_s )M_s] \\ &= {\mathbb E}[(M_t - M_s)M_s] + {\mathbb E}[M^2_s] \\ &= {\mathbb E}[M_t - M_s] \cdot {\mathbb E}[M_s] + {\mathbb E}[M^2_s] \\ &= {\mathbb E}[M^2_s] \\ &= \Sigma_s \end{align}

Finally, my question: Conditional expectation: $${\mathbb E}[M_t|W_T] = ?$$

Edit I’m aware of the result ${\mathbb E}[W_t|W_T]=\frac{t}{T}W_T$ using brownian bridge.

Thanks for your kind attention.

Edit2 This question has a follow-up which might be of interest as well: Regression of stochastic integral on Wiener process

## Answer by StackG (score 7, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/60246

What a great question! I've had a go at it below, I'd say I'm about 75% sure of the result I've got to but I'd love feedback from others.

I'm going to use the definition of the Ito integral, \begin{align} \int^t_0 \sigma_s dW_s = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} \bigl( W_{t_i} - W_{t_{i-1}} \bigr) \end{align} where $t_n = t$.

Then, using the expression for Brownian Bridging that you've provided above (and neglecting the $\lim_{n \to \infty}$ below for breviety) \begin{align} {\mathbb E}\bigl[M_t | W_T\bigr] &= {\mathbb E}\bigl[ \int^t_0 \sigma_s dW_s | W_T\bigr] \\ &= {\mathbb E}\bigl[ \ \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} \bigl( W_{t_i} - W_{t_{i-1}} \bigr) \ | W_T\bigr] \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} {\mathbb E}\bigl[ \bigl( W_{t_i} - W_{t_{i-1}} \bigr) | W_T\bigr] \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} \bigl( {\mathbb E}\bigl[ W_{t_i}| W_T\bigr] - {\mathbb E}\bigl[ W_{t_{i-1}} | W_T\bigr] \bigr) \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} \bigl( {\frac {t_i} T}W_T - {\frac {t_{i-1}} T}W_T \bigr)\\ &= {\frac {W_T} T} \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_{t_{i-1}} \bigl( {t_i} - {t_{i-1}} \bigr) \\ &= {\frac {W_T} T} \int_0^t \sigma_{s} ds\\ \end{align}

As a sanity check, we can see that setting $\sigma_s = 1$ reproduces the brownian bridging expression.

## Answer by Gabriele Pompa (score 4)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/60297

Just wanted to add to @StackG's great answer using a different approach. Please, double-check my solution as well because I'm not 100% sure.

Let $\sigma_t$ be sufficiently regular such that $\dot{\sigma}_t \stackrel{def}{=}\frac{d \sigma}{dt}$ is well defined. Then, Ito's lemma:

$$ d(\sigma_t W_t) = \dot{\sigma}_t W_t dt + \sigma_t dW_t $$

which in integral form reads

$$ \sigma_t W_t = \int^t_0 \dot{\sigma}_s W_s ds + \int^t_0 \sigma_s dW_s $$

We have then the representation

\begin{align} M_t & \stackrel{def}{=} \int^t_0 \sigma_s dW_s \\ &= \sigma_t W_t - \int^t_0 \dot{\sigma}_s W_s ds \end{align}

Therefore, using Fubini to interchange integral with expectation, recalling that $\sigma_t$ is deterministic, and that ${\mathbb E}[W_t|W_T] = \frac{t}{T} W_T$ we can write the requested conditional expectation as

\begin{align} {\mathbb E}[M_t|W_T] & \stackrel{def}{=} {\mathbb E}\left[\int^t_0 \sigma_s dW_s \bigg| W_T \right] \\ &= \sigma_t {\mathbb E}[W_t|W_T] - \int^t_0 \dot{\sigma}_s {\mathbb E}[W_s|W_T] ds \\ &= \sigma_t \frac{t}{T} W_T - \frac{W_T}{T} \int^t_0 \dot{\sigma}_s s ds \\ &= \sigma_t \frac{t}{T} W_T - \frac{W_T}{T} \left[ \sigma_t t - \int^t_0 \sigma_s \cdot 1 ds\right] \\ &= \frac{W_T}{T} \int^t_0 \sigma_s ds \end{align} where integration by parts has been used in the next-to-last line.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.