Skip to content
All library documents

Conditional Expectation Orthogonality and Variance Minimization

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Math

Summary

The document introduces conditional expectation given a sub-sigma-algebra and uses its defining properties to establish basic identities. It proves that the residual between an integrable random variable and its conditional expectation has mean zero by applying the conditional-expectation property to the whole probability space.

For the orthogonality claim, it outlines identifying zero as the conditional expectation of the residual multiplied by a measurable difference, first checking the defining integral condition on events in the sub-sigma-algebra. It sketches extending the argument from indicator variables through simple and positive measurable variables to general cases. The exercise also asks how this orthogonality yields a variance-minimizing property, but the provided answer does not complete that proof. The discussion is therefore a partial proof guide, and the extension for arbitrary measurable variables requires suitable integrability assumptions.

Key ideas

  • Conditional expectation preserves the unconditional mean when conditioning on a sub-sigma-algebra.
  • The residual from conditional expectation has mean zero.
  • A proof of conditional orthogonality can begin by verifying the defining integral condition on measurable events.
  • The response sketches extending the event-level result using simple functions and monotone convergence.
  • The document poses a variance comparison but does not provide its full proof.

Tags

Full text
# Expectations in Infinite Probability Spaces with Sub Sigma-Algebras


# Expectations in Infinite Probability Spaces with Sub Sigma-Algebras












Let $X$ be an (integrable) random variable on a probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P})$. Suppose $\mathcal{G}$ is a sub-$\sigma$-algebra of $\mathcal{F}$ and let $Z=\mathbb{E}(X|\mathcal{G})$.

(a) Show that: $\mathbb{E}(X-Z)=0$

(b) Let $Y$ be an arbitrary $\mathcal{G}$-measurable random variable. Show that: $\mathbb{E}[(X-Z)(Z-Y)|\mathcal{G}]=0$

(c) Show that: $\mathbb{E}[(X-Z)(Z-Y)]=0$

(d) Suppose that $\mathbb{E}(X-Y)=0$. Show that: Var$(X-Z)\le$ Var$(X-Y)$.

Hint: Break up $X-Y = (X-Z)+(Z-Y)$.

The ideas that need to be proven all make sense to me intuitively, but I just don't know how to go about formalizing the actual proof itself in an infinite probability space. I tried approaching it from a finite probability space standpoint, but I don't think it's working.

## Answer by Cettt (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/51582

you are asking four questions at the same time. I will try to answer the first and maybe you can take it from there.

First of all we have to understand the definition of the conditional expectation give a sigma-field $Z=\mathbb{E}(X|\mathcal{G})$. $Z$ is a random variable which satisfies three properties (by definition):

- $Z$ is integrable, i.e. $\mathbb{E}(|Z|) < \infty$.

- $Z$ is $\mathcal{G}$-measurable.

- $\mathbb{E}(Z \cdot 1_G ) = \mathbb{E}(X \cdot 1_G )$ for all $G \in \mathcal G$. This is the most important property.

All of your questions can be solved using this definition.

For your first question we take property 3 and set $G = \Omega$. Then we get that $$ \mathbb{E}(Z) = \mathbb{E}(Z \cdot 1_\Omega ) = \mathbb{E}(X \cdot 1_\Omega ) = \mathbb{E}(X). $$ This is equivalent to $$ 0 = \mathbb{E}(X - Z) = \mathbb{E}(X) - \mathbb{E}(Z). $$

Hope this helps a little.

### Edit (part b)

In order to prove (b) you have to show that the random variable $W = 0$ has all three defining properties of $\mathbb{E}((X-Z)(Z-Y)|\mathcal{G})$. The first two are trivial to show. For the third property you have to show that $$ \mathbb{E}((X-Z)(Y-Z) 1_G) = \mathbb E(W 1_G) = 0, \quad \text{for all} \ G \in \mathcal{G}. $$

This can be done by a classical procedure: first you assume that $Y = 1_A$, then you assume that $Y$ is a simple function, than we assume that $Y$ is a positive random variable (monotone convergence), and finally we can show it for general $Y$.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.