Skip to content
All library documents

Conditional GBM Probabilities Using Multi-Period Binary Options

Article Quant Q&A · Author: PVD

Summary

The document addresses how to find risk-neutral probabilities that an asset finishes above a threshold at a later observation date, conditional on having stayed below earlier thresholds. A single-date Black–Scholes probability does not capture those multiple path conditions. The response instead uses higher-order binary option valuations, whose payoffs require the asset to satisfy specified above or below barrier conditions at several dates.

Under geometric Brownian motion, the multi-period binary value is expressed through a multivariate normal cumulative distribution with thresholds and correlations determined by observation times and volatility. Combining the binary value with discounting yields the joint probability of passing the final threshold while failing the earlier ones; dividing by the probability of the earlier conditions gives the desired conditional probability. This provides a closed-form framework for the stated model, though it relies on its risk-neutral GBM assumptions and evaluation of a multivariate normal distribution.

Key ideas

  • A single-date Black–Scholes probability does not account for conditions at multiple earlier dates.
  • Higher-order binary payoffs encode above or below threshold conditions across observation dates.
  • Under geometric Brownian motion, these joint events can be evaluated with a multivariate normal distribution.
  • Conditional probabilities follow by dividing the appropriate joint probability by the probability of the conditioning event.
  • The approach depends on the risk-neutral GBM model and its assumptions.

Tags

Full text
# Conditional Probability - Geometric Brownian Motion


# Conditional Probability - Geometric Brownian Motion












Background

I am trying to find a way to price a variant of a gap option by using closed-end expressions. What makes this option a bit tricky is that it can be exercised at four predetermined dates (t=1, 2, 3, 4) and that the strike/the barrier to exercise, H, increases for each period. On the other hand, the strike determining the size of the payoff, K, is so small compared to the value of the underlying asset that it will always be optimal to exercise early, which somewhat simplifies the pricing.

Question

In this connection, I need to estimate the (risk-neutral) probability of the option being in-the-money at t=2 assuming it is out-of-the-money at t=1, and further estimate the probability of the option being in-the-money at t=3 assuming it is out-of-the-money at both t=1 and t=2 etc. Assuming that the underlying asset follows a geometric Brownian motion where it’s price at t can be written as:

$S_t = S_0e^{(\alpha-\delta-0.5\sigma^2)t+\sigma\sqrt{t}z}$

By using the Black-Scholes formula, the probability of the option being in-the-money can be estimated as N(d2).

How can I estimate the probability of the option being in-the-money at t=3, assuming it is out-of-the-money at t=1 and t=2? And further estimate the probability of the option being in-the-money at t=4 assuming it is out-of-the-money at t=1, t=2 and t=3?

## Answer by LocalVolatility (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/41569

One way to obtain many multi-period risk-neutral probabilities related to geometric Brownian motion processes is to use the valuation function for higher-order binaries. These contracts are special cases of the multi-asset multi-period $\mathbb{M}$-binaries introduced by Skipper and Buchen (2003)

#### Definition

The time $T_n$ terminal value of a $n$-th order bond binary is given by

\begin{equation} \mathcal{B}_{\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_n}^{s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_n} \left( S_{T_1}, S_{T_2}, \ldots, S_{T_n}, T_n \right) = \prod_{i = 1}^n \mathrm{1} \left\{ s_i S_{T_i} > s_i \xi_i \right\}. \end{equation}

I.e. this contract has a unit payoff conditional on the asset prices at all times $T_i$ being above ($s_i = 1$) or below ($s_i = -1$) the levels $\xi_i$, respectively. Its time $0 \leq t < T_1$ value is given by

\begin{equation} \mathcal{B}_{\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_n}^{s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_n} \left( S_t, t \right) = e^{-r \tau_n} \mathcal{N}_n \left( \mathbf{\alpha}_-; \mathbf{C} \right), \end{equation}

where $\tau_i = T_i - t$ and $N_n(\mathbf{x}; \mathbf{C})$ is the $n$-variate standard normal cumulative distribution function evaluated at $\mathbf{x}$ and with correlation matrix $\mathbf{C}$. The elements of $\mathbf{\alpha}_-$ are given by

\begin{equation} \alpha_{-, i} = \frac{s_i}{\sigma \sqrt{\tau_i}} \left( \ln \left( \frac{S}{\xi_i} \right) + \left( r - \delta - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) \tau_i \right) \end{equation}

and

\begin{equation} \mathbf{C}_{i, j} = s_i s_j \sqrt{\frac{\min \{ s_i, s_j \}}{\max \{ s_i, s_j \}}}. \end{equation}

#### Joint Probability

Using these results, you obtain the joint probability of $S_{T_n}$ being above $K_n$ and each $S_{T_i}$ being below $K_i$ for $i \in \{ 1, 2, \ldots, n - 1 \}$ as

\begin{equation} \mathbb{P} \left\{ S_{T_n} > K_n, S_{T_i} < K_i \; \forall \; i < n \right\} = e^{r \tau_n} \mathcal{B}_{K_1, K_2, \ldots, K_n}^{-, -, \ldots, +} \left( S_t, t \right). \end{equation}

From this, you can then compute the conditional probability.

#### References

Buchen, Peter W. (2001) "Image Options and the Road to Barriers", Risk Magazine, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 127-130

Skipper, Max and Peter W. Buchen (2003) "The Quintessiential Option Pricing Formula", Working Paper, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.