Correlated Forward Rates in Libor Market Model Simulation

# Practical implementation of Libor Market Model


# Practical implementation of Libor Market Model












I am trying to implement a project about the BGM model, suggested in the book "The Concepts and Practice of mathematical finance" by Mark Joshi.

My question is related to the forward volatility structure, particularly about the covariance matrix. First of all, the book assumes that forward $f_j$ has volatility $$ K_j \left(\left(a + b(t_j - t)\right)e^{-c(t_j-t)} + d\right) $$

for $t < t_j$ and $0$ otherwise. Also, the instantaneous correlation between the forward rates $f_i$ and $f_j$ is defined as $e^{-\beta|t_i - t_j|}$.

Now, I need to write a method that "computes the covariance matrix for the time-step".

I get confused with the fact that there are "simultaneous" forward rates at each time step that have to be simulated, which brings me to the following two questions:

- Concerning the dimensions of the covariance matrix, I see that they depend on the number of time periods (and not on the time step size), but how long are the time periods? Is there a convention?

- How do the elements of the covariance matrix come into play? This might sound a bit stupid, but when pricing a swaption, we can have the following discretization of the logarithm of the forward rate: $$ \ln F_k^{\Delta t}(t + \Delta t) = \ln F_k^{\Delta t}(t) + \sigma_k(t)\sum_{j = \alpha + 1}^k \frac{\rho_{k,j}\,\tau_j\,\sigma_j(t)\,F_j^{\Delta t}(t)}{1 + \tau_j F_j^{\Delta t}(t)} \Delta t - \\ \frac{\sigma_k(t)^2}{2}\Delta t + \sigma_k(t)\left(Z_k(t + \Delta t) - Z_k(t)\right)$$ I do not see how the covariance matrix helps in a Monte Carlo simulation. I might be confusing concepts, so some help would be welcome.

## Answer by Gordon (score 5, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/18391

For a swap, we have a sequence of re-setting and payment dates. The # of forward rates corresponding to the # of payment dates. For example, let us assume that we have $n$ payment dates $t_1, \ldots, t_n$, where $0< t_1 < \cdots < t_n$. Then there are $n$ forward rates.

During the simulation, for time steps prior to $t_1$, there exist $n$ "simultaneous" forward rates, corresponding to payment dates $t_1, \ldots, t_n$, while for time steps between $t_1$ and $t_2$, there exist $n-1$ "simultaneous" forward rates, corresponding to payment dates $t_2, \ldots, t_n$. For time steps between $t_{n-1}$ and $t_n$, there is only a single forward rate that corresponds to the last payment date $t_n$.

Because of the existence of these "simultaneous" forward rates, except for the time steps between $t_{n-1}$ and $t_n$, the Cholesky decomposition of the correlation matrix between the driving Brownian motions of the existing forward rate dynamics is needed. That is how the covariance matrix come into play in the Monte Carlo simulation.

## Answer by Tulio Carnelossi (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/16249

There are two things that might be confusing you. The time step in Time dimensions and time steps along the forward curve. The first is given a time t from today until a certain day in the future, this dt usually is the next reset date. The the other is tau representing a tenor for the forward curve maturing in tau days ahead. Dtau could vary depending how did you build your term-structure of interest rates.

Regarding the covariance hole, it's a essential feature of the model because it's the drift condition that makes the model arbitrage free . it's not exclusively in swaption but a generic LIBOR Market Model simulation.