Decomposing Bachelier Caplets into Digital Options
Summary
The document explains how to express a Bachelier caplet as the difference between an asset-or-nothing payoff and a cash-or-nothing payoff. Under the stated forward-measure setup, the cash digital component is proportional to the strike times the probability that the rate exceeds the strike. The asset component combines the forward rate weighted by that probability with a volatility-density adjustment.
The derivation uses a change of measure: weighting outcomes by the underlying forward rate defines a measure under which the asset-or-nothing value can be written using an exceedance probability. Together, the two digital terms reproduce the call payoff decomposition. The discussion assumes a Gaussian Bachelier model and a suitable martingale measure; the answer also notes that a Gaussian underlying need not always be positive. It gives an analytical explanation rather than numerical validation or implementation guidance.
Key ideas
- A Bachelier caplet can be decomposed into asset-or-nothing and cash-or-nothing digital components.
- The cash digital value depends on the strike multiplied by the probability of finishing above it.
- The asset digital value includes a forward-rate probability term and a volatility-density adjustment.
- A change of measure weighted by the underlying provides the decomposition under a martingale assumption.
- The formulas rely on the Gaussian Bachelier framework and the stated measure setup.
Tags
Full text
# Bachelier Pricing Formula for Interest Rate Binary Options
# Bachelier Pricing Formula for Interest Rate Binary Options
Similarly to the Black and Scholes formula, I am looking to replicate Bachelier's caplet formula with two digital options: (1) asset-or-nothing (forward rate in this case) and (2) cash-or-nothing. For reference, Bachelier's caplet formula is: $$c(t,T_{i-1},T_i) = \delta*P(t,T_i)*\Bigl((F(t,T_{i-1},T_i)-K)*\Phi(D)+\sigma*\sqrt{T_{i-1}-T_i}*\phi(D)\Bigr)$$ $$where$$$\delta=$ frequence factor, $P(t,T_i)$ is the discount factor, $D={F(t,T_{i-1},T_i)-K}/{\sigma*\sqrt{T_{i-1}-T_i}}$, $\Phi$ is the cumulative distribution function and $\phi$ is the probability density function
For reference, in the BS formula, the part $$S*N(d_1)$$ is for the asset-or-nothing and the part $$K*e^{-rt}*N(d_2)$$ is for the cash-or-nothing.
My take is that, as $\Phi(D)$ represents the probability to be in-the-money, a digital caplet cash-or-nothing is value as: $$D_{cash}(t,T_{i-1},T_i) = \delta*P(t,T_i)*K*\Phi(D)$$ and a digital caplet asset-or-nothing is value as: $$D_{asset}(t,T_{i-1},T_i) = \delta*P(t,T_i)*\Bigl(F(t,T_{i-1},T_i)*\Phi(D)+\sigma*\sqrt{T_{i-1}-T_i}*\phi(D)\Bigr)$$
Many thanks!
## Answer by user35980 (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/76908
The Bachelier digital caplet formula is just $ \delta*P(t,T_i)*\Phi(D).$ For a derivation see this answer with the $d_2$ there replaced by your $D$.
## Answer by siou0107 (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/76909
Assume that you are working on a measure $\mathbb{Q}$ under which your underlying $S$ is a martingale (e.g., $S$ is a forward price/LIBOR rate under the forward measure, numeraire of which is the discount factor to your derivative's payment date). Just notice that
\begin{align} \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} \left[\left(S_T - K\right)^+\right] & = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} \left[\left(S_T - K\right) \mathbf{1}_{S_T > K}\right] \\ & = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} \left(S_T \mathbf{1}_{S_T > K}\right) - K \mathbb{Q} \left(\left\{S_T > K\right\}\right) \\ & = S_0 \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} \left(\frac{S_T}{S_0} \mathbf{1}_{S_T > K}\right) - K \mathbb{Q} \left(\left\{S_T > K\right\}\right) \end{align}
Because $S$ is a martingale, $\frac{S_T}{S_0}$ is a random variable with expected value 1 (not necessarily positive for a Gaussian underlying… Let us say that if $S_0$ and $K$ are positive, the indicator function saves you :) ), and thus defines a measure change. Let us define $\mathbb{Q}^S$ by $\frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbb{Q}^S}{\mathrm{d}\mathbb{Q}} = \frac{S_T}{S_0}$. The corresponding numeraire is $S$ itself. You then have $$ \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} \left[\left(S_T - K\right)^+\right] = S_0 \mathbb{Q}^S \left(\left\{S_T > K\right\}\right) - K \mathbb{Q} \left(\left\{S_T > K\right\}\right) $$
This gives you exactly your decomposition in the asset-or-nothing option and $K$ digital options!
So in the Bachelier formula (just carry out the integration), the asset-or-nothing option value is $$ S_0 \Phi \left(D\right) + \sigma \sqrt{T} \phi \left(D\right) $$ and the binary option term is $$ K \Phi \left(D\right) $$Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.