Skip to content
All library documents

Deriving a Barrier-Hitting Probability PDE for Geometric Brownian Motion

Article Quant Q&A · Author: A.Oreo

Summary

The document asks how to derive the probability that a geometric Brownian motion reaches a lower barrier before a fixed horizon. It challenges a proposed derivation that applies the Brownian reflection principle directly to the asset price and integrates its terminal transition density. The responses explain that the reflection principle is specific to Brownian motion and generally does not apply to geometric Brownian motion.

A standard route is to define the probability conditional on information at the current time. This conditional probability is a martingale, and applying Itô’s formula gives the backward equation with drift and diffusion terms. The discussion notes a special parameter case in which the log price has no drift and a Brownian reflection argument can be used. It does not work through boundary and terminal conditions or solve the PDE, and the notation for the barrier event needs care: the event should reflect the stated lower-barrier crossing rather than an upper crossing.

Key ideas

  • The conditional probability of hitting a barrier by the horizon is a martingale before the barrier is reached.
  • Applying Itô’s formula to that conditional probability yields a backward PDE.
  • The Brownian reflection principle does not generally apply directly to geometric Brownian motion.
  • A reflection argument can apply to the log process in the special case where its drift is zero.

Tags

Full text
# The PDE of the probability hitting the barrier before T


# The PDE of the probability hitting the barrier before T












Suppose: $$d S=\mu S dt+\sigma Sd W$$ $Q(t,S)$ is the probability that $S$ hit the barrier $B(S_t<B)$ before $T,$ then $Q$ satisfies following `PDE` $$Q_t+\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2S^2_{SS}Q+\mu S Q_S=0.$$ Could I prove that this way

`Proof:` $$Q(t,S)=\mathbb{P}(\tau_B\leq T)$$ here $\tau_B$ is the `first passage time` at level $B$.

Then use the `reflection principle` for a Wiener process:

We have $$\mathbb{P}(\tau_B\leq T)=2\mathbb{P}(S_T>B)=2\int^{\infty}_Bp(t,S,T,y)d y$$ Here $p(t,S,T,y)$ is the `transition function` of $S_T$

From `Kolmogorov backward equation` we know $$p_t+\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2S^2p_{SS}+\mu S p_S=0.$$ then take the derivatives into the integral, we done.

I am not sure is the whole process correct? And is there any standard way to calculate the such PDE of probability, since the default probability also meet this pde

## Answer by Gordon (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33992

May be I have overlooked something, but I believe that \begin{align*} Q(t, S) = \mathbb{P}\left(\tau_{B} \le T \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right). \end{align*} Then $\{Q(t, S), \, 0<t < T\}$ is a martingale, and the PDE follows immediately, by noting that \begin{align*} dQ &= Q_t dt + Q_S dS + \frac{1}{2}Q_{SS} d\langle S, S\rangle_t\\ &=\Big(\underbrace{Q_t + \mu S Q_S + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2Q_{SS} S^2}_{=0}\Big)dt + \sigma S Q_S dW_t. \end{align*}

## Answer by M. Jeunesse (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/32786

Reflection principal ? Reflection principle.

It holds for the Brownian process, not the GBM. [Reflection principle is quite specific to symmetric random walks].

By chance, if $\mu-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}=0$ and $\sigma>0$, then you have : $$\mathbb{P}(\tau^S_B<T)=\mathbb{P}(\tau^W_{\frac{1}{\sigma}\ln(B)}<T)$$ and you can apply reflection principle.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.