Deriving a Brownian Motion Integral with Itô's Lemma
Summary
The document explains how to evaluate an Itô integral of a power of Brownian motion by applying Itô's lemma to the function f(x) = x^(n+1). For standard Brownian motion, the first derivative contributes the stochastic integral, while the second derivative contributes a time integral through quadratic variation. Integrating that differential over the interval and rearranging gives the stated identity, including the factor n in the correction term.
The worked response also identifies the flaw in the questioner's approach: using the transformation F = W² does not correctly carry the power and Itô correction through the calculation. The derivation relies on Brownian motion's standard drift and volatility and assumes the functions and integrals involved are well-defined. It is a mathematical explanation of an Itô calculus identity, not a trading strategy or empirical result.
Key ideas
- Apply Itô's lemma to f(Wt) = Wt^(n+1) to derive the integral identity.
- The second derivative produces a correction involving n and the time integral of W to the power n−1.
- Integrating the differential over the interval and dividing by n+1 yields the desired expression.
- The attempted transformation through W² loses the required factor in the correction term.
- The derivation assumes standard Brownian motion and suitable integrability.
Tags
Full text
# How to perform basic integrations with the Ito integral?
# How to perform basic integrations with the Ito integral?
From the text book Quantitative Finance for Physicists: An Introduction (Academic Press Advanced Finance) I have this excercise:
Prove that
$$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^ndW(s)=\frac{1}{n+1}[W(t_2)^{n+1}-W(t_1)^{n+1}]-\frac{n}{2}\int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^{n-1}ds $$
Hint: Calculate $d(W^{n+1})$ using Ito's lemma.
This is my calculation:
I use Ito's Lemma and use, as the text book does, the simplified case $\mu=0$, $\sigma=1$. So Ito's lemma reduces to:
$$ dF=dt+2WdW $$
Now I use the Ito Lemma here like this:
$$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^ndW(s)=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^{n-1}W(s)dW(s) $$
Because $\mu=0$, $\sigma=1$, we have $F=W^2$ and therefore the integral equals: $$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2}F^\frac{n-1}{2}\frac{dF}{2}-\int_{t_1}^{t_2}F^\frac{n-1}{2}\frac{dt}{2} $$ Further simplification: $$ \frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{n+1}F^\frac{n+1}{2}]_{t_1}^{t_2}-\frac{1}{2}W^{n-1}(t)dt=\frac{1}{n+1}W^{n+1}]_{t_1}^{t_2}-\frac{1}{2}W(t)^{n-1}(t)dt $$ Putting everything together obviously yields: $$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^ndW(s)=\frac{1}{n+1}[W(t_2)^{n+1}-W(t_1)^{n+1}]-\frac{1}{2}\int_{t_1}^{t_2}W(s)^{n-1}ds $$
The second term lacks a factor $n$.
What am I doing wrong? Or is the book wrong? (By the way for $n=1$ this is consistent with the book. For $n=1$ I was also able to calculate the integral using summation $\lim_n\sum$.... But this seems too complicated for general case.)
Besides I have problems understanding why I have to use the differential equation. Or do I have to see $W$ as $W=W(F,t)$?
Edit: Removed some lines...
## Answer by SRKX (score 6, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/2153
I think you should see the hint as follows:
$$d(W_t^{n+1})=d(f(W_t))$$ with $$f(x)=x^{n+1}$$
Apply Ito:
$$d(W_t^{n+1}) = f'(W_t)dW_t + \frac{1}{2} f''(W_t) d<W>_t$$
$$d(W_t^{n+1}) = (n+1) W_t^n dW_t + \frac{1}{2} n (n+1) W_t^{n-1} dt$$
If you integrate, you get:
$$W_{t_2}^{n+1}-W_{t_1}^{n+1}=(n+1) \int_{t_1}^{t_2} W_t^n dW_t+ \frac{1}{2} n (n+1) \int_{t_1}^{t_2} W_t^{n-1} dt$$
You divide both sides by $(n+1)$ and you're done.
I'm not sure how you use your Ito's lemma, maybe you've been fooled by some simplified version of some books. I'd recommend Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View if you want a good introduction to the field.
As for you assumptions, $\mu=0$ and $\sigma=1$ are the properties of a Brownian motion after just a single step $W_1$, by definition.
Here the purpose of the exercise is in my opinion to show you that by applying Ito's lemma, you might end up finding interesting properties (one of the most famous one was shown in this post).Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.