Deriving a Self-Financing Call Hedge Under the Stock Numeraire
Summary
The document derives the self-financing portfolio interpretation of a vanilla call when the stock is used as numeraire. Starting from a martingale representation for the call price divided by the stock, it applies Itô's formula to relate changes in the option value to changes in the stock and bond holdings. The key correction is a cross-variation term involving changes in both the call price and the stock price, which had been omitted in the initial calculation.
Keeping terms through order dt, the corrected calculation yields a portfolio whose bond holding is represented by the martingale coefficient and whose stock holding is the residual value needed to match the option. This resolves why an apparent extra term seemed to prevent self-financing. The explanation assumes the stated diffusion model and numeraire-measure setup; it is a derivation rather than an empirical test, and it does not address transaction costs or departures from the model assumptions.
Key ideas
- Under the stock numeraire, the discounted call value is represented relative to the stock price.
- Applying Itô's formula to the price ratio requires accounting for cross-variation between option and stock changes.
- The omitted cross term is what resolves the apparent mismatch with self-financing.
- The corrected differential expresses the call as holdings in the bond and stock.
Tags
Full text
# Vanila Option self financing under Stock as numeraire
# Vanila Option self financing under Stock as numeraire
I am trying to see how the vanilla call option can be seen as self financing using the Stock as the numeraire. The case with the Bond as numeraire is quite simple and can be found in Wilmott's FAQ for instance.
We assume that under the real world probability measure
$$ dS=S(\mu dt + \sigma dW)\\ dB=B rdt $$
It is well known that under the Stock as as numeraire we can get the call option as
$$ \frac{C_t}{S_t} = E_{\mathbb S,t} [ \frac{S_T-K}{S_T} \Theta(S_T-K) ] $$
where under measure $\mathbb S$ we have
$$ dS= S( (r+ \sigma^2) dt + \sigma dW_S) \\ dB= B r dt $$ which gives $dW_S = dW + \frac{\mu - r- \sigma^2}{\sigma} dt$. Specifically under this measure $\frac{B}{S}$ is a Martingale
$$ d(\frac{B}{S})= \sigma \frac{B}{S} dW_S $$
My question is that I should be able to see this as a self financing portfolio but I cannot. I am sure that I am making a mistake but cannot find it. I do the following (I suppress the time subscript in the following)
From the Martingale representation theorem we have $$ d(\frac{C}{S})=\alpha d( \frac{B}{S}) $$ for some pre-visible process $\alpha$.
This can be written as
$$ dC = \alpha dB + \frac{ C-\alpha B}{S} dS - \frac{ C-\alpha B}{S^2} dS^2 $$
It's the last piece that I don't understand. Without it we would have a self-financed portfolio. I could try to write it in terms of $dB$ but it still doesn't give me a self-financed portfolio. What am I doing wrong?
## Answer by Borun Chowdhury (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/37393
I found the mistake I was making. Its the same mistake I made a variant of this problem about two years ago and Quantuple answered it. I am giving the correct answer here for completeness.
From the Martingale representation theorem we have
$$ d(\frac{C}{S}) = \alpha d (\frac{B}{S}) $$
Now the LHS is
$$ LHS = \frac{dC}{S} - \frac{CdS}{S^2} + \frac{CdS^2}{S^3} - \color{red}{\frac{dCdS}{S^2}} $$
I was missing the red term in my derivation. We are keeping terms only upto order $dt$ and the piece that contributes from the $dC$ in the last term will be $\mathcal O(dW)$.
The RHS is
$$ \alpha ( \frac{dB}{S} - \frac{BdS}{S^2} + \frac{BdS^2}{S^3}) $$
and there is no equivalent term for the red one because $dB$ has not stochastic piece so such a term would not appear at order $dt$.
From these one gets
$$ dC= \alpha dB + (C-\alpha B) \frac{dS}{S} $$
making $C$ a self-financed strategy.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.