Skip to content
All library documents

Deriving Bachelier Volatility in a Displaced Libor Market Model

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Richi Wa

Summary

The document asks whether normal (Bachelier) implied volatilities can be derived directly for caps or swaptions under a Libor market model, rather than first deriving Black-76 volatility and converting it. The proposed forward-rate dynamics use a displacement parameter, deterministic time-dependent volatility, and an instantaneous volatility scale that follows a CIR process.

No derivation, cited paper, numerical evidence, or answer is provided; the text is a research question that identifies a modeling setup and a choice of valuation approach. It therefore serves as a prompt for further literature review rather than a usable pricing method. Any comparison between direct normal-volatility derivation and conversion from Black-76 would need to account for the chosen model assumptions and instrument structure, which the document does not develop.

Key ideas

  • The question concerns normal implied volatility for caps and swaptions in a Libor market model.
  • The proposed forward-rate model includes displacement and deterministic time-dependent volatility.
  • The instantaneous volatility scale is modeled as a CIR process.
  • The document does not supply a derivation or recommend a method for converting Black-76 volatility.

Tags

Full text
# Bachelier implied volatilities in the Libor market model


# Bachelier implied volatilities in the Libor market model












There are various papers on how to derive a Black76 implied volatlity for a given specification of a Libor market model (especially for deterministic but time dependent volatility of forward rates and more envolved for the case of a stochastic volatility scaling).

My setting is the following: $$ dF_k(t)/(F_k(t)+\delta) = drift + v_t \sigma(t) dW_t $$ where $\delta$ is a displacement parameter, $\sigma(t)$ is deterministic and $v_t$ is the instantaneous volatility scaling that follows a CIR-process.

Are there any papers on a (direct not via Black76) derivation of Bachelier/normal vols for caps or even for swaptions? Or would it be best to first consider Black76 vols and then approximate normal vols?

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.