Skip to content
All library documents

Deriving Equal-Weight Portfolio Volatility with Common Correlation

Article Quant Q&A · Author: HavelTheGreat

Summary

The document derives the volatility of an equally weighted portfolio when all assets have the same volatility and every distinct pair has the same correlation. It starts from the covariance sum for portfolio variance: the covariance matrix has unit correlations on its diagonal and the common correlation on its off-diagonal entries. Counting those entries yields variance equal to the common asset variance multiplied by the stated diversification factor; taking its square root gives portfolio volatility.

A second derivation writes the covariance matrix as a combination of the identity matrix and an all-ones matrix, then applies the quadratic form for portfolio variance. Both approaches rely on equal asset variances, equal weights, and a common pairwise correlation. The formula is a simplifying result under these assumptions, not a general portfolio-risk formula for assets with different volatilities or correlations.

Key ideas

  • The derivation assumes equal weights, equal asset volatilities, and one common correlation across distinct assets.
  • Portfolio variance is the weighted sum of all covariance matrix entries.
  • The diagonal contributes one unit correlation per asset, while every off-diagonal entry contributes the common pairwise correlation.
  • Taking the square root of the resulting variance gives the portfolio volatility formula.
  • The same result follows from the matrix expression for portfolio variance.

Tags

Full text
# Setup for proving equation 3.4 from Grinold


# Setup for proving equation 3.4 from Grinold












I'm studying from Grinold's Active Portfolio Management right now, and used the below equation to answer one of the exercises:

> .. let us assume that the correlation between the returns of all pairs of stocks is equal to $\rho$. Then the risk of an equally weighted portfolio is

$$\sigma_P = \sigma \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1 + \rho \cdot (N - 1)}{N}}$$

Using this equation though, I realized I don't really know why it's true. Maybe an obvious question, but how would you go about proving this equation is true? I realized I don't quite know how you'd conveniently write out the total risk equation here and reduce it.

## Answer by Pleb (score 5, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/79800

In order to derive the simplified portfolio volatility, there is also an assumption of equal variance $\sigma_i = \sigma$ for all $i$.

Assume we have an equally weighted portfolio of $n$ assets with common correlation and variance. Hence, $w_i = \frac{1}{n}$, $\rho_{ij} = \rho$ and $\sigma_i = \sigma$ for all $i,j=1,\ldots,n$.

Then, the portfolio variance can be simplified algebraically:

\begin{align*} \sigma^2_p &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n w_i w_j\sigma_i\sigma_j \rho_{ij} \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{n} \sigma \cdot \sigma \cdot \rho\\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{1}{n^2} \sigma^2 \cdot \rho\\ &= \frac{\sigma^2 }{n^2}\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \rho \end{align*} Now, for $i=j$ we know that the correlation with itself is $\rho_{ii} = 1$. There are $n$ diagonal elements meaning that we have $\sum_{i=1}^n \rho_{ii} = n$. Moreover there exists $n^2-n$ off-diagonal elements in a $n \times n$ matrix. Using these results we further get: \begin{align*} \ldots &= \frac{\sigma^2 }{n^2}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n \rho_{ii} + \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j\neq i} \rho_{ij} \right)\\ &= \frac{\sigma^2 }{n^2}\left(n+ \rho \cdot (n^2 - n) \right)\\ &=\frac{\sigma^2 }{n^2} \cdot n \cdot \left(1 + \rho \cdot (n - 1) \right)\\ &=\sigma^2 \cdot \frac{1 + \rho \cdot (n - 1)}{n} \end{align*}

Now, the formula for portfolio volatility follows directly by taking the square-root:

$$ \sigma_p = \sigma \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1 + \rho \cdot (n - 1)}{n}} $$

Note that the portfolio variance can also be derived using matrix algebra on $\sigma_p^2 = w^T \Sigma w$.

## Answer by Kermittfrog (score 5)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/79815

For sake of completeness, let me add the approach using linear algebra. Let the covariance matrix

$$ \begin{align} \Sigma&=\sigma^2\begin{pmatrix} 1&\rho&\rho&\ldots&\rho \\ \rho&1&\rho&\ldots&\rho \\ \ldots&\ldots&\ldots&\ldots&\ldots \\ \rho&\rho&\rho&\ldots&1 \end{pmatrix}\\ &=\sigma^2\left((1-\rho)\mathbf{I}+\rho\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^T\right) \end{align} $$

Given the weight vector $w=\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{1}}$, i.e. $w_i=1/n$, the portfolio variance is

$$ \begin{align} \mathrm{Var}_w&=w^T\Sigma w\\ &=\sigma^2\frac{\mathbf{1}^T}{\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{1}}\left((1-\rho)\mathbf{I}+\rho\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^T\right)\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{1}}\\ &=\sigma^2\left((1-\rho)\frac{1}{\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{1}}+\rho\right)\\ &=\sigma^2\frac{1+\rho(n-1)}{n} \end{align} $$

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.