Deriving Local Volatility from a Smoothed Implied Volatility Surface

# How to get the local volatility from IV surface?


# How to get the local volatility from IV surface?












I have to work on Dupire's model.

If I understand Fengler's paper well enough we can get the local volatility from implied volatility smoothed surface because if not it would look all bumpy like the graphic on the right page 35, and that's not what I have when I use the formulas detailed and approximated in this paper (Kotze et al: Implied and Local Volatility Surfaces for South African Index and Foreign Exchange Options).

So I smoothed it using a non-parametric regression, it's decent according to this paper (Wu, Liu: Curve-Fitting Method for Implied Volatility), and then I don't know what to do.

First thing I absolutely don't understand is why we could use $\sigma_{1}(t)\sigma_{2}(S)$ to regularize it and get a function then, instead of $\sigma(S, t)$ (I saw it really fast on a board so I may be wrong). And then, how do we get the vol surface from the implied volatility surface ? (I'm not asking for the full procedure, but for a few tips, it's quite hard to understand everything as a beginner).

Thanks.

## Answer by Magic is in the chain (score 4, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50020

You can convert the implied volatility to local volatility using this formula:

$\sigma^2 \left(T,y\right)=\frac{\frac{\partial w}{\partial T}}{1 -\frac{ y}{w} \frac{\partial w}{\partial y}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}+\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{ y^2}{w^2}-\frac{1}{w}-\frac{1}{4}\right)\left( \frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right)^2}$

Where y is the money-ness, defined as $y=\ln \left(\frac{ K}{F} \right)$, and w is the transformation of Black Scholes implied vol $w=\sigma_{BS}^2\,T$

So the conversion part is easy. The challenge then is: we have implied vol quotes for only a limited number of strikes and maturities, we can certainly fit surfaces through these points and get the local vol surface at as granular level as we like, but there is an infinite number of functional forms that will fit the finite number of data points we got. So you have to bring in some constraints, these could be in the form of specifying the function itself (e.g., cubic spline, SVI etc), or putting in some regularisation (e.g., smooth function to be preferred), so that's how the regulation aspect comes into play.

Hope this helps!