Skip to content
All library documents

Deriving the Drift Change Between Numéraire Measures

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user9078057

Summary

The note examines how a process’s drift changes when switching between probability measures associated with different numeraires. It starts from a diffusion for an asset and a stated quadratic covariation with the ratio of numeraires, then asks how the term gamma enters through Girsanov’s theorem. The answer infers a Brownian exposure for the inverse numéraire ratio, writes that ratio in exponential form, and uses the resulting change in Brownian motion to obtain a drift adjustment.

The response also flags a likely mismatch in the question’s covariation: its derivation relies on covariation with the inverse ratio, rather than the ratio as originally written. Under that interpretation, it obtains a drift shift with the opposite sign from the one stated in the question. This is a conditional derivation, not a general formula: the numéraire ratio must satisfy the assumed martingale dynamics, and the volatility and sign conventions must be checked carefully.

Key ideas

  • A change of numéraire can be represented by a Radon–Nikodym density built from the numéraire ratio.
  • The density’s Brownian exposure determines the Brownian motion shift under Girsanov’s theorem.
  • The answer derives an exponential form for the ratio from an assumed martingale diffusion.
  • The derivation depends on using covariation with the inverse numéraire ratio, as the answer suspects was intended.
  • The resulting drift adjustment is conditional on the stated dynamics and sign conventions.

Tags

Full text
# Where does the term $\gamma$ come from when moving from measure $\mathbb Q^{N}$ to $\mathbb Q^{M}$?


# Where does the term $\gamma$ come from when moving from measure $\mathbb Q^{N}$ to $\mathbb Q^{M}$?












Consider two measures $\mathbb Q^{M}$ and $\mathbb Q^{N}$, as well as the two numéraires $M$ and $N$, furthermore assume that $X\frac{N}{M}$ is a $\mathbb Q^{M}$-martingale. Furthermore, the covariation $X$ and $\frac{M}{N}$ satisfy the following:

$$dX(t)\cdot d\frac{M(t)}{N(t)} = \frac{M(t)}{N(t)}X(t)\gamma(t)dt$$

Finally we assume:

$$ dX(t) = X(t)(\mu(t)dt+\sigma(t)dW(t))\; \; \; \text{under }\mathbb Q^{M},$$

It is then stated that by using Girsanov, it follows

$$ dX(t) = X(t)(\mu(t)+\gamma(t) )dt+\sigma(t)dW(t))\; \; \; \text{under }\mathbb Q^{N} $$

Where does the term $\gamma$ come from when moving from measure $\mathbb Q^{N}$ to $\mathbb Q^{M}$?

My attempt: Since the justification was made by using Girsanov, I have attempted to reconcile this with what I know about Girsanov.

We have in general that $\mathbb E^{\mathbb Q^{N}}[X]= \mathbb E^{\mathbb Q^{M}}[X\frac{M}{N}]$, i.e. $\frac{d\mathbb Q^{N}}{d\mathbb Q^{M}}=\frac{M}{N}$

How can we write $$\frac{M(t)}{N(t)}$$ in exponential form though?

Any ideas on what I am missing?

## Answer by Gordon (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/69721

From your assumption that \begin{align*} dX(t)\cdot d\frac{M(t)}{N(t)} &= \frac{M(t)}{N(t)}X(t)\gamma(t)dt,\\ dX(t) &= X(t)\big(\mu(t)dt+\sigma(t)dW(t)\big), \end{align*} under $\mathbb Q^{M}$, we can speculate that \begin{align*} d\frac{N(t)}{M(t)} = -\frac{N(t)}{M(t)}\frac{\gamma(t)}{\sigma(t)}dW(t) \tag{1} \end{align*} as $\frac{N(t)}{M(t)}$ should be a martingale under $\mathbb Q^{M}$ with the numeraires $M$. Then, under $\mathbb Q^{M}$, \begin{align*} d\frac{M(t)}{N(t)} = \frac{M(t)}{N(t)}\bigg(\frac{\gamma^2(t)}{\sigma^2(t)} dt + \frac{\gamma(t)}{\sigma(t)} dW_t\bigg).\tag{2} \end{align*}

However, I doubt that you actually meant \begin{align*} dX(t)\cdot d\frac{N(t)}{M(t)} &= \frac{N(t)}{M(t)}X(t)\gamma(t)dt. \end{align*}

From $(1)$, \begin{align*} \frac{N(t)}{M(t)} = \frac{N(0)}{M(0)} \exp\bigg(-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\frac{\gamma^2(s)}{\sigma^2(s)} ds - \int_0^t \frac{\gamma(s)}{\sigma(s)}dW(s) \bigg). \end{align*} Based on Girsanov theorem, $\hat{W}=\{\hat{W}(t), \, t \ge 0\}$, where, for $t \ge 0$, \begin{align*} \hat{W}(t) = W(t) + \int_0^t \frac{\gamma(s)}{\sigma(s)}ds, \end{align*} is a standard Brownian motion under $\mathbb Q^{N}$. Then, \begin{align*} dX(t) = X(t)\Big[\big(\mu(t)-\gamma(t) \big)dt+\sigma(t)d\hat{W}(t)\Big], \end{align*} under $\mathbb Q^{N}$.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.