Skip to content
All library documents

Deriving the Piecewise ODE Solution for a Randomized American Put

Article Quant Q&A · Author: bcf

Summary

The document examines how to derive the value function for an American put whose expiration is randomized by a Poisson jump time. It states the governing differential equation, the unknown exercise boundary, and boundary conditions for value matching, smooth pasting, and decay at high stock prices. It then lays out Carr’s piecewise representation in terms of randomized European put and call values and an interest component associated with the exercise region.

The author solves the in-the-money continuation-region equation as a homogeneous power solution plus a particular solution, then applies the boundary conditions at the exercise boundary. The resulting constants resemble the published expression but do not match its call-like component, prompting a request to locate the derivation error. The document supplies equations and parameter definitions but no resolution, independent numerical check, or complete derivation. Its value is therefore as a focused mathematical question about matching solutions across regions, rather than a self-contained pricing recipe. The derivation assumes the stated model and boundary conditions; readers should verify the source formulas and interface conditions before relying on it.

Key ideas

  • The randomized American put is modeled by a differential equation with a Poisson arrival rate tied to the stated horizon parameter.
  • The exercise boundary is unknown and is constrained by value matching and smooth pasting.
  • The proposed solution combines randomized European put and call components with an interest-related term.
  • A power-function homogeneous solution and a linear particular solution are presented for the continuation region below the strike.
  • The author’s boundary-condition calculation does not reproduce one coefficient in Carr’s expression, and the document leaves that discrepancy unresolved.

Tags

Full text
# ODE Solution in Carr's Randomized American Put


# ODE Solution in Carr's Randomized American Put












In Carr's 1998 paper Randomization and the American Put, he sets up the following ODE for the value of an American put with expiration given by the first jump time of a Poisson process with rate $\lambda = 1/T$ (Eq. 10 in link): $$ \frac{\sigma^2}{2}S^2 P^{(1)}_{SS}(S) + rSP^{(1)}_S(S) - rP^{(1)}(S) = \lambda[P^{(1)}(S) - (K - S)^+], \qquad S > \underline{S}_1 \quad (1) $$ subject to the boundary conditions $$ \lim_{S \, \uparrow \infty} P^{(1)}(S) = 0, \qquad \lim_{S \, \downarrow \underline{S}_1} P^{(1)}(S) = K - \underline{S}_1, \qquad \lim_{S \, \downarrow \underline{S}_1} P^{(1)}_S(S) = -1\;. $$ Here $P^{(1)}(S)$ is the randomized American put value and $\underline{S}_1 < K$ is the (unknown) optimal exercise boundary. Carr gives the following solution, which I am struggling to derive myself: \begin{align*} P^{(1)}(S) = \begin{cases} p^{(1)}(S) + b^{(1)}(S) \qquad & \text{if } S > K \\ KR - S + c^{(1)}(S) + b^{(1)}(S) \qquad & \text{if } S \in (\underline{S}_1, K) \\ K - S \qquad & \text{if } S \leq \underline{S}_1 \end{cases} \end{align*} Here, $p^{(1)}(S)$ is the randomized value of a European put paying $(K-S)^+$ at the first jump: $$ p^{(1)}(S) = \left(\frac{S}{K}\right)^{\gamma - \epsilon} (qKR - \hat{q}K), \qquad S > K $$ where $$ \gamma = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{r}{\sigma^2}, \qquad R = \frac{1}{1 + rT}, \qquad \epsilon = \sqrt{\gamma^2 + \frac{2}{R\sigma^2 T}} $$ and $$ p = \frac{\epsilon - \gamma}{2\epsilon}, \qquad q = 1-p, \qquad \hat{p} = \frac{\epsilon - \gamma + 1}{2\epsilon}, \qquad \hat{q} = 1 - \hat{p} \;. $$ The quantity $b^{(1)}(S)$ is described as the present value of interest received below the critical stock price $\underline{S}_1$ until the first jump, $$ b^{(1)}(S) = \left(\frac{S}{\underline{S}_1}\right)^{\gamma - \epsilon} qKRrT \;. $$ Finally, $c^{(1)}(S)$ is the randomized value of a European call paying $(S - K)^+$ at the first jump time, $$ c^{(1)}(S) = \left(\frac{S}{K}\right)^{\gamma + \epsilon} (\hat{p}K - pKR), \qquad S < K\;. $$

Here's what I did for the case $S \in (\underline{S}_1, K)$, for which I'm not arriving at Carr's solution. Using the change of variables $x \mapsto \log S$, it's easy to show the homogeneous solution to $(1)$ is $$ P^{(1)}_{homo}(S) = c_1 S^{\gamma + \epsilon} + c_2 S^{\gamma - \epsilon} $$ and that the particular solution is $$ P^{(1)}(S) = c_1 S^{\gamma + \epsilon} + c_2 S^{\gamma - \epsilon} + RK - S\;. $$ Using the boundary conditions $\lim_{S \, \downarrow \underline{S}_1} P^{(1)}(S) = K - \underline{S}_1$ and $\lim_{S \, \downarrow \underline{S}_1} P^{(1)}_S(S) = -1$, I get that \begin{align*} c_1 & = \underline{S}_1^{-\gamma - \epsilon}(pK - pKR), \\ c_2 & = \underline{S}_1^{\epsilon - \gamma}qKRrT \end{align*} This is almost the correct solution, if only we had $c_1 = K^{-\gamma - \epsilon}(\hat{p}K - pKR)$. That is, replacing $\underline{S}_1$ with $K$ and the first $p$ with $\hat{p}$. Can anyone spot where I may have made a mistake?

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.