Deriving the Radon–Nikodym Derivative Between Forward Measures
Summary
The document derives the density ratio between two forward measures by applying the change-of-numéraire principle. A numéraire is a strictly positive price process used as the unit for valuing other assets; changing the numéraire changes the associated martingale measure. The answer presents a general Radon–Nikodym derivative for moving from the measure associated with one numéraire to that associated with another, then applies it to zero-coupon bond prices.
Using bonds maturing at the respective forward dates as numeraires yields the stated ratio of bond prices at the observation time and at the initial time. The response also connects the framework to pricing a European call on a zero-coupon bond, with terms expressed under different forward measures. It cites a change-of-numéraire result as its basis, but does not develop the stochastic calculus behind Girsanov’s theorem; the explanation focuses on why the bond-price ratio is the relevant measure-change density.
Key ideas
- A numéraire is a strictly positive price process used to measure other asset prices.
- Changing the numéraire induces a corresponding change in the martingale measure.
- Using zero-coupon bonds as numeraires gives the density ratio between forward measures.
- Bond option prices can be expressed using probabilities under the forward measures associated with the relevant maturities.
Tags
Full text
# How do we derive the Radon-Nikodym derivative for T-forward measures?
# How do we derive the Radon-Nikodym derivative for T-forward measures?
Let $Q^{T_e}$ denote the $T_e$-forward measure and let $Q^{T_p}$ denote the $T_p$-forward measure.
I have seen the following Radon-Nikodym derivative being used in derivations. For $0 \le t \le T_p$, \begin{align*} \eta_t \equiv \frac{dQ^{T_p}}{dQ^{T_e}}\mid_{t} = \frac{P(t, T_p)P(0, T_e)}{P(0, T_p)P(t, T_e)}. \end{align*}
How do we derive this formula? This seems very different from the Radon-Nikodym derivative specified in Girsanov's theorem for changing measures.
## Answer by Kevin (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/51318
To give some background, I give you some pieces from Geman, El Karoui and Rochet (1995) which use a change of numéraire. A fundamental observation is the change of measure formula $\mathbb{E}^\mu[X]=\mathbb{E}^\nu\left[\frac{\mathrm{d}\mu}{\mathrm{d}\nu} X\right]$.
Defintion 2 defines what a numéraire is.
> A numéraire is a price process $X(t)$ almost surely strictly positive for each $t\in[0, T]$.
Basically, numéraires are assets which are used to measure the prices of all other assets. Often, one just uses a risk-free bank account. But there are other possibilities, particularly in the interest rate world.
Assumption 1 assumes that there exists an asset a numéraire with associatted martingale measure.
> There exists a non-dividend-paying asset $n(t)$ and a probability $\pi$ equivalent to the initial probability $\mathbb{P}$ such that for any basic security $S_k$ without intermediate payments, the price of $S_k$ relative to $n$, i.e. $S_k(t)/n(t)$ is a local martingale with respect to $\pi$. By convention, we will take $n(0) = 1$.
The key part of the paper, and the answer to your question, is given in theorem 1.
> Let $X(t)$ be a non-dividend paying numeraire such that $X(t)$ $n$-martingale. Then there exists a probability measure $Q_X$ defined by its Radon-Nikodym derivative with respect to $\pi$ $$\frac{\mathrm{d}Q_X}{\mathrm{d}\pi}\Bigg|\mathcal{F}_T = \frac{X(T)n(0)}{X(0)n(T)}$$ such that the basic securities prices are $Q_X$-local martingales, if a contingent claim $H$ has a fair price under $(n, \pi)$, then it has a fair price $(X, Q_X)$ and the hedging portfolio is the same.
So, replacing $X$ and $n$ by your bond prices (and $T$ by $t$) yield the sought Radon-Nikodym derivative in your question.
As an application, Section 4.1 derives the time zero price of a European-style call option expiring at time $T_0$ with strike price $K$ written on a default-free zero-coupon bond maturing at time $T_1>T_0$ as $$C(0)=P(0,T_1)\mathbb{Q}^{T_1}[A]-KP(0,T_0)\mathbb{Q}^{T_0}[A],$$ where $A$ is the exercise set and $\mathbb{Q}^T$ is the $T$-forward measure using a bond maturing at time $T$ as numéraire.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.