Diagnosing Implied Volatility Signals for Delta-Hedged S&P 500 Options
Summary
This notebook outlines validation-only diagnostics for a 10-session delta-hedged S&P 500 options return label. It organizes financial predictors into implied-volatility-dependent and independent groups, then compares Ridge models using a single volatility feature, each group, and all features. The models use identical walk-forward folds and validation keys, and pooled daily rank information coefficients are summarized with uncertainty intervals.
Further checks measure how implied-volatility signals decay across lags, compare feature associations with delta-hedged returns, unhedged returns, and the difference between them, and use principal component analysis to describe feature dimensionality from training data. The supplied excerpt cuts off the lag analysis and includes no reported numerical findings, so it does not establish which predictors perform best. Results are mechanism diagnostics only: they do not select a model or strategy, run a backtest, or affect the primary return-to-expiry population or locked holdout.
Key ideas
- The analysis compares feature groups on matching walk-forward validation observations for a 10-session delta-hedged label.
- Daily rank information coefficients use a minimum cross-sectional size and are summarized with uncertainty estimates.
- Return decomposition compares associations with hedged, unhedged, and inferred hedge-contribution outcomes.
- Principal component analysis is fitted on training data to examine financial-feature dimensionality.
- These diagnostics do not determine model selection or establish a trading strategy.
Tags
Full text
# 90_ic_diagnostic.py
```py
# ---
# jupyter:
# jupytext:
# cell_metadata_filter: tags,-all
# text_representation:
# extension: .py
# format_name: percent
# format_version: '1.3'
# jupytext_version: 1.19.3
# kernelspec:
# display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel)
# language: python
# name: python3
# ---
# %% [markdown]
# # S&P 500 Options: IC Mechanism Diagnostic
#
# This preview-only notebook studies the diagnostic 10-session delta-hedged label. It uses the
# finalized financial feature artifact and constructs label-specific walk-forward folds directly
# from the diagnostic label. Fold-scoped temporal estimates are deliberately excluded because their
# geometry follows the return-to-expiry label.
#
# The notebook examines feature ablation, lag decay, return decomposition, and training-only feature
# dimensionality. It writes no registry rows, enters no official population, runs no backtest, and
# cannot select or alter the return-to-expiry population.
# %%
"""Run validation-only mechanism diagnostics for the secondary option label."""
import numpy as np
import plotly.graph_objects as go
import polars as pl
from ml4t.diagnostic.metrics import compute_ic_uncertainty
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge
from case_studies.sp500_options._ic_diagnostics import daily_ic
from case_studies.utils.artifact_digest import value_digest
from utils.cv_splits import select_folds
from utils.modeling import generate_cv_splits, prepare_cv_folds
from utils.paths import get_case_study_dir
from utils.reproducibility import set_global_seeds
# %% tags=["parameters"]
EXECUTION_TIER = "preview"
MAX_SYMBOLS = 0
MAX_FOLDS = 0
SEED = 42
CASE_STUDY = "sp500_options"
DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL = "fwd_ret_dh_10d"
UNHEDGED_LABEL = "fwd_ret_10d"
LABEL_BUFFER = "10D"
# How many names a date needs before its cross-sectional correlation is computed at all. One
# number, used by both IC computations below, because they measure the same quantity on the same
# panel and a reader compares them directly. They carried 5 and 20, neither explained, which made
# the two figures answer slightly different questions without saying so: a date with eight names
# contributed to one and not the other. Ten is the floor `04_model_based_features` screens its
# incremental features on, so the whole case study now reports IC over the same minimum
# cross-section. A rank correlation over fewer names is mostly the sampling noise of which names
# happened to quote that day.
MIN_SYMBOLS_PER_DATE = 10
# %% [markdown]
# ## Financial features and label-specific folds
# %%
if EXECUTION_TIER != "preview":
raise ValueError("the IC mechanism diagnostic is excluded from canonical execution")
set_global_seeds(SEED)
# Finalized features and labels are inputs, and `get_case_study_dir` is what finds them wherever
# they are. It resolves to ML4T_OUTPUT_DIR when one is set, which is where the stage 01-05
# artifacts live under test, and to the repository's own case-study directory otherwise, which is
# where a maintainer checkout keeps them. Reading a repository-relative path directly finds
# neither under test: `features/` and `labels/` are gitignored, so a plain checkout has no such
# file. Nothing can hand this notebook an isolated preview root to resolve into instead - it
# declares no WORKSPACE parameter, so the harness injects none.
case_dir = get_case_study_dir(CASE_STUDY)
financial = pl.read_parquet(case_dir / "features" / "financial.parquet")
diagnostic_label = pl.read_parquet(case_dir / "labels" / f"{DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL}.parquet")
unhedged_label = pl.read_parquet(case_dir / "labels" / f"{UNHEDGED_LABEL}.parquet")
join_keys = ["symbol", "instrument_id", "timestamp"]
metadata = {"underlying_price", "instr_mid", "instr_bid", "instr_ask"}
feature_names = [column for column in financial.columns if column not in set(join_keys) | metadata]
dataset = financial.join(diagnostic_label, on=join_keys, how="inner", validate="1:1")
if MAX_SYMBOLS:
symbols = dataset.get_column("symbol").unique().sort().head(MAX_SYMBOLS)
dataset = dataset.filter(pl.col("symbol").is_in(symbols))
if dataset.n_unique(["symbol", "timestamp"]) != dataset.height:
raise ValueError("diagnostic modeling keys are not unique")
splits = generate_cv_splits(
dataset,
case_study_id=CASE_STUDY,
label_buffer=LABEL_BUFFER,
outcome_horizon=LABEL_BUFFER,
date_col="timestamp",
)
if MAX_FOLDS:
splits = select_folds(splits, range(MAX_FOLDS))
if not splits:
raise ValueError("diagnostic fold selection is empty")
diagnostic_scope = pl.DataFrame(
{
"execution_tier": [EXECUTION_TIER],
"label": [DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL],
"rows": [dataset.height],
"symbols": [dataset.get_column("symbol").n_unique()],
"financial_features": [len(feature_names)],
"folds": [len(splits)],
"max_symbols_reduction": [MAX_SYMBOLS],
"max_folds_reduction": [MAX_FOLDS],
"financial_digest": [value_digest(financial, join_keys)],
"label_digest": [value_digest(diagnostic_label, join_keys)],
}
)
diagnostic_scope
# %% [markdown]
# ## Feature taxonomy
#
# The classification below is an explicit diagnostic hypothesis. It must cover the shipped
# financial feature vector exactly and does not become shared orchestration or model configuration.
# %%
IV_LEVEL_AND_VRP_FEATURES = [
"iv_atm",
"call_iv",
"put_iv",
"iv_skew_atm",
"iv_atm_z_63",
"iv_atm_z_252",
"iv_mom_5d",
"iv_mom_10d",
"iv_mom_21d",
"iv_atm_pctl",
"vrp_5d",
"vrp_10d",
"vrp_21d",
"vrp_42d",
"vrp_63d",
"iv_rv_ratio",
"vrp_zscore_252",
"vrp_mom_5d",
"vrp_mom_10d",
"vrp_21d_pctl",
"iv_rv_ratio_pctl",
]
OPTION_SENSITIVITY_FEATURES = [
"instr_delta",
"abs_net_delta",
"instr_gamma",
"instr_theta",
"instr_vega",
"theta_vega_ratio",
"instr_pct_of_S",
"instr_ret_1d",
"instr_ret_5d",
"instr_cost_mom_5d",
]
IV_INDEPENDENT_FEATURES = [
"ret_1d",
"ret_5d",
"ret_10d",
"ret_21d",
"rv_5d",
"rv_10d",
"rv_21d",
"rv_42d",
"rv_63d",
"volume_zscore",
"instr_rel_spread",
"spread_pctl",
"instr_dte",
"dte_normalized",
"qc_both_converged",
"qc_any_estimated_iv",
]
IV_DEPENDENT_FEATURES = IV_LEVEL_AND_VRP_FEATURES + OPTION_SENSITIVITY_FEATURES
iv_dependent = set(IV_DEPENDENT_FEATURES)
iv_independent = set(IV_INDEPENDENT_FEATURES)
feature_set = set(feature_names)
if iv_dependent & iv_independent:
raise ValueError(f"feature taxonomy overlaps: {sorted(iv_dependent & iv_independent)}")
if iv_dependent | iv_independent != feature_set:
raise ValueError(
"feature taxonomy differs from the finalized financial artifact: "
f"missing={sorted(feature_set - (iv_dependent | iv_independent))}, "
f"extra={sorted((iv_dependent | iv_independent) - feature_set)}"
)
pl.DataFrame(
{
"group": ["IV-dependent", "IV-independent"],
"feature_count": [len(iv_dependent), len(iv_independent)],
}
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## Feature ablation
#
# Four Ridge requests use the same label-specific folds and exact validation keys. The uncertainty
# interval is computed from the pooled daily validation IC series with the 10-session horizon.
# %%
ablation_requests = {
"iv_atm_z_252": ["iv_atm_z_252"],
"IV-dependent": IV_DEPENDENT_FEATURES,
"IV-independent": IV_INDEPENDENT_FEATURES,
"all financial": feature_names,
}
def fit_ablation(features: list[str]) -> pl.DataFrame:
prepared = prepare_cv_folds(
dataset.to_pandas(),
splits,
features,
DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL,
"timestamp",
"symbol",
)
rows = []
for fold in prepared:
model = Ridge(alpha=10.0)
model.fit(fold["X_train"], fold["y_train"])
rows.append(
pl.DataFrame(
{
"timestamp": fold["dates"],
"symbol": fold["entities"],
"fold": fold["fold"],
"y_true": fold["y_val"],
"y_score": model.predict(fold["X_val"]),
}
)
)
return pl.concat(rows).sort("timestamp", "symbol", "fold")
def summarize_ablation(features: list[str]) -> dict:
predictions = fit_ablation(features)
daily = daily_ic(
predictions,
pred_col="y_score",
ret_col="y_true",
min_symbols_per_date=MIN_SYMBOLS_PER_DATE,
described_as=f"the {len(features)}-feature Ridge ablation",
)
uncertainty = compute_ic_uncertainty(daily.select("ic"), horizon=10, n_boot=1000)
return {
"feature_count": len(features),
"mean_ic": float(uncertainty["mean_ic"]),
"hac_lower": float(uncertainty["ci_hac_lower"]),
"hac_upper": float(uncertainty["ci_hac_upper"]),
"hac_p_value": float(uncertainty["p_hac"]),
"validation_days": int(uncertainty["n_days"]),
"key_digest": value_digest(predictions.select("symbol", "timestamp", "fold")),
}
# %% tags=["results"]
ablation = pl.DataFrame(
[
{"request": name, **summarize_ablation(features)}
for name, features in ablation_requests.items()
]
)
if ablation.get_column("key_digest").n_unique() != 1:
raise RuntimeError("ablation requests do not share exact validation coverage")
fig = go.Figure(
go.Bar(
x=ablation.get_column("request").to_list(),
y=ablation.get_column("mean_ic").to_list(),
error_y={
"type": "data",
"symmetric": False,
"array": (ablation["hac_upper"] - ablation["mean_ic"]).to_list(),
"arrayminus": (ablation["mean_ic"] - ablation["hac_lower"]).to_list(),
},
hovertemplate="%{x}<br>validation IC %{y:+.4f}<extra></extra>",
)
)
fig.add_hline(y=0, line_width=1, line_dash="dot", line_color="#666666")
fig.update_layout(
title="Financial-feature ablation on identical diagnostic validation keys",
xaxis_title="Feature request",
yaxis_title="Mean daily rank IC",
)
fig.show()
ablation
# %% [markdown]
# ## IV lag decay
# %%
validation = pl.concat(
[
dataset.filter(
pl.col("timestamp")
.cast(pl.Date)
.is_between(
pl.lit(split["val_start"]).cast(pl.Date),
pl.lit(split["val_end"]).cast(pl.Date),
closed="both",
)
)
for split in splits
]
).unique(subset=join_keys)
def mean_daily_ic(frame: pl.DataFrame, feature: str, target: str) -> float:
panel = frame.select(
pl.col("timestamp"),
pl.col("symbol"),
pl.col(feature).alias("y_score"),
pl.col(target).alias("y_true"),
).drop_nulls()
daily = daily_ic(
panel,
pred_col="y_score",
ret_col="y_true",
min_symbols_per_date=MIN_SYMBOLS_PER_DATE,
described_as=f"{feature!r} against {target!r}",
)
mean_ic = daily.select(pl.col("ic").mean()).item()
return float(mean_ic)
# %% tags=["results"]
lags = (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 42, 63)
lag_panel = validation.select("timestamp", "symbol", "iv_atm_z_252", DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL).sort(
"symbol", "timestamp"
)
lag_rows = []
for lag in lags:
shifted = lag_panel.with_columns(
pl.col("iv_atm_z_252").shift(lag).over("symbol").alias("iv_lagged")
)
autocorrelation = (
1.0
if lag == 0
else shifted.drop_nulls().select(pl.corr("iv_atm_z_252", "iv_lagged")).item()
)
lag_rows.append(
{
"lag_sessions": lag,
"mean_ic": mean_daily_ic(shifted, "iv_lagged", DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL),
"iv_autocorrelation": autocorrelation,
}
)
lag_results = pl.DataFrame(lag_rows)
fig = go.Figure(
go.Scatter(
x=lag_results.get_column("lag_sessions").to_list(),
y=lag_results.get_column("mean_ic").to_list(),
mode="lines+markers",
customdata=lag_results.get_column("iv_autocorrelation").to_list(),
hovertemplate=(
"lag %{x} sessions<br>validation IC %{y:+.4f}"
"<br>IV autocorrelation %{customdata:.3f}<extra></extra>"
),
)
)
fig.add_hline(y=0, line_width=1, line_dash="dot", line_color="#666666")
fig.update_layout(
title="IV diagnostic IC by feature lag",
xaxis_title="Feature lag in sessions",
yaxis_title="Mean daily rank IC",
)
fig.show()
lag_results
# %% [markdown]
# ## Return decomposition
#
# The same validation rows compare the delta-hedged label, the unhedged label, and their difference.
# %% tags=["results"]
decomposition = validation.join(
unhedged_label.rename({UNHEDGED_LABEL: "unhedged_return"}),
on=join_keys,
how="inner",
validate="1:1",
).with_columns((pl.col("unhedged_return") - pl.col(DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL)).alias("hedge_contribution"))
decomposition_features = (
"iv_atm_z_252",
"vrp_21d",
"iv_atm",
"instr_pct_of_S",
"ret_1d",
"rv_21d",
"volume_zscore",
)
decomposition_targets = {
"delta-hedged": DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL,
"unhedged": "unhedged_return",
"hedge contribution": "hedge_contribution",
}
decomposition_ic = pl.DataFrame(
[
{
"feature": feature,
"target": target_name,
"mean_ic": mean_daily_ic(decomposition, feature, target),
}
for feature in decomposition_features
for target_name, target in decomposition_targets.items()
]
)
heatmap = decomposition_ic.pivot(
on="target",
index="feature",
values="mean_ic",
aggregate_function="first",
).sort("feature")
target_columns = list(decomposition_targets)
fig = go.Figure(
go.Heatmap(
z=heatmap.select(target_columns).to_numpy(),
x=target_columns,
y=heatmap.get_column("feature").to_list(),
colorscale="RdBu",
zmid=0,
texttemplate="%{z:+.3f}",
colorbar={"title": "Mean IC"},
)
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Financial-feature IC by diagnostic return component",
xaxis_title="Return component",
yaxis_title="Financial feature",
)
fig.show()
decomposition_ic
# %% [markdown]
# ## Training-only feature dimensionality
# %%
pca_fold = prepare_cv_folds(
dataset.to_pandas(),
select_folds(splits, [0]),
feature_names,
DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL,
"timestamp",
"symbol",
)[0]
pca = PCA().fit(pca_fold["X_train"])
cumulative_variance = np.cumsum(pca.explained_variance_ratio_)
fig = go.Figure(
go.Scatter(
x=list(range(1, len(cumulative_variance) + 1)),
y=cumulative_variance,
mode="lines",
hovertemplate="%{x} components<br>cumulative variance %{y:.1%}<extra></extra>",
)
)
for threshold in (0.90, 0.95, 0.99):
components = int(np.searchsorted(cumulative_variance, threshold)) + 1
fig.add_hline(
y=threshold,
line_width=1,
line_dash="dot",
annotation_text=f"{threshold:.0%}: {components} of {len(feature_names)} components",
annotation_position="top left",
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Training-only cumulative variance of financial features",
xaxis_title="Principal components",
yaxis_title="Cumulative variance explained",
yaxis_range=[0, 1.01],
)
fig.show()
# %% [markdown]
# These result tables and figures describe validation-only mechanism checks for the diagnostic
# label. They do not enter model selection, strategy selection, or the locked holdout.
```Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: MIT
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.