Skip to content
All library documents

Discrete Dividend Forward Pricing and Cost of Carry

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Bruce Chang

Summary

The discussion explains why a known cash dividend can appear to be carried at the net cost-of-carry rate in a discrete-dividend forward formula, even though the dividend itself is reinvested in a cash account at the risk-free rate. A hedge-based derivation distinguishes the risky stock exposure from the known cash payment: the hedge holds fewer shares at the ex-dividend date, so the dividend contribution is scaled by the stock’s yield adjustment. Setting the forward value to zero produces a dividend term that evolves at the net carry rate.

The answer assumes a continuous proportional yield for reinvested proportional dividends, a known absolute dividend, risk-neutral discounting, and continuity of the forward value across the ex-dividend date. A second response notes that discrete-dividend modeling conventions vary and mentions escrowed, spot-strike-adjustment, forward, and piecewise-lognormal approaches. The result therefore depends on the specified model and dividend treatment; it is not a claim that cash dividends literally earn the net carry rate.

Key ideas

  • A hedge-based derivation can explain the net-carry adjustment on a known discrete dividend in the forward strike formula.
  • The absolute dividend is discounted as a known cash flow, while the stock exposure is adjusted for its proportional yield.
  • The dividend term reflects the reduced share position in the hedge at the ex-dividend date.
  • Discrete-dividend forward pricing depends on modeling assumptions, and alternative approaches are used.

Tags

Full text
# Why does the forward-price formula compound discrete dividends using cost-of-carry-rate 𝑐 rather than interest rate 𝑟?


# Why does the forward-price formula compound discrete dividends using cost-of-carry-rate 𝑐 rather than interest rate 𝑟?












In Wikipedia, the formula for the forward price of a tradable underlying that pays discrete dividends is given as:

My confusion is this: once a dividend $D_i$is paid at time $t_i$, it becomes cash and arguably could be reinvested at the risk‐free rate $r$. So I would expect the accumulation for that dividend to be $D_ie^{r(T-t_i)}$. However the formula uses $D_ie^{(r-q)(T-t_i)}$ i.e., effectively using cost‐of‐carry rate $c=r-q$ for the dividends. I understand that for the stock, it should use the net carry rate $c=r-q$. But why does the formula also use $c$ for the accumulation of $D_i$?

Could someone clarify the modelling assumptions or derivation that justify that choice? Thanks in advance!

## Answer by river_rat (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/85198

A few assumptions here:

- Proportional dividends are reinvested into the stock and we model those as a continuous yield $q$

- Absolute dividends are reinvested into the cash account and we assume one will occur at time $T_d$ with value $D$

- The value of the forward just before the stock goes ex-div is the same as the forward after it goes ex-div.

- The risk neutral expectation on a known cash flow $K$ at time $T$ valued at time $t$ is $e^{-r(T-t)}K$

- The risk neutral expectation of a risky cash flow $S_T$ at time $T$ valued at time $t$ is $e^{-q(T-t)}S_t$

With these assumptions we can calculate the value of the forward contract at the following times

- At time $T$: $V(T) = S_T-K$

- At time $T_d^+$: $V(T_d^+) = e^{-q (T-T_d)}S_{T_d^+}-e^{-r(T-T_d)}K$

- At time $T_d^-$: $V(T_d^-) = e^{-q (T-T_d)}(S_{T_d^-}-D)-e^{-r(T-T_d)}K$

- At time $t$: $V(t) = e^{-q (T-t)}S_t - e^{-q (T-T_d)}e^{-r (T_d-t)}D-e^{-r(T-t)}K$

Setting this to par shows that the fair forward strike is $$K(t,T) = e^{(r-q) (T-t)}S_t - e^{(r-q) (T-T_d)}D$$

So we can see that we are re-investing the absolute dividend in the cash account but we do not receive a full dividend $D$ but rather a proportional dividend $e^{-q (T-T_d)}D$ as we are only holding $e^{-q (T-T_d)}$ stock at the ex-div date in the hedge portfolio.

## Answer by João (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/85197

Discrete dividends are a very interesting topic.

It is better to model them as discrete than continuous for pricing (obviously depends). Forward price comes from the usual no arbitrage pricing. Dividends being reinvested are a choice that imply unnecessary problems to the normal forward price calculation.(e.g., what rate will you use for special dividends that are not on the schedule?)

Also dividends reduce the spot price, thus being accounted on the cost of carry Instead, each dividend reduces the forward value of S_0 and for the relationship to remain arbitrage-free, its value must evolve under the same c=r−q that links the spot and the forward.

Some articles and models:

Klassen created a somewhat "new" forward model based on the SKA

bos and vandermark 2002 created the spot strike adjustment (cannot find the article)

Escrowed Model

Forward Model

Piecwise Lognormal Model

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.