Discretizing the Carr-Madan Static Option Replication Formula
Summary
The document explains how the Carr-Madan decomposition represents a European payoff as a bond position, a call-minus-put position at a chosen strike, and integrals of puts and calls weighted by the payoff’s second derivative. In a complete market with deterministic rates, these terms correspond to present values of static positions in zero-coupon bonds and options on the future.
Because the integrals require options across a continuum of strikes, the accepted answer approximates them with finite sums. It shows a trapezoidal-rule discretization over a strike partition, translating each interval into weighted put positions; the call side follows the same approach. The number and spacing of strikes are therefore implementation choices rather than a universal fixed count. In practice, available listed strikes constrain the approximation, and both discretization and strike-range truncation introduce error. The discussion references VIX calculation as an example but does not provide a numerical implementation or error analysis.
Key ideas
- The Carr-Madan decomposition expresses a terminal payoff using a bond, a call-put pair, and weighted options across strikes.
- The integrals can be approximated with finite sums over a partition of strike space.
- The trapezoidal rule assigns option weights based on the payoff curvature and strike spacing.
- The feasible strike grid depends on which options actually trade.
- Finite strike spacing and limited strike coverage create discretization and truncation error.
Tags
Full text
# How to approximate the Carr-Madan decomposition formula?
# How to approximate the Carr-Madan decomposition formula?
I have came across the excellent answer.
I'm looking for a dicrete approximation of the Carr-Madan decomposition formula of the function $f(F_T)$ of the terminal futures price by taking a static position at time $t=0$ in options:
> $$f(F_T)=f(\kappa) + f'(\kappa) [(F_T - \kappa)^+ - (\kappa - F_T)^+] + \int_0^{\kappa} f''(K) (K-F_T)^+ \ d K + \int_{\kappa}^{\infty} f''(K) (F_T-K)^+ \ d K.$$ The first term can be interpreted as the payoff from a static position in $f(\kappa)$ pure discount bonds, each paying one dollar at $T$. The second term can be interpreted as the payoff from $f'(\kappa)$ calls struck at $\kappa$ less $f'(\kappa)$ puts, also struck at $\kappa$. The third term arises from a static position in $f''(K)dK$ puts at all strikes less than $\kappa$. Similarly, the fourth term arises from a static position in $f''(K)dK$ calls at all strikes greater than $\kappa$.
My intuition is to approximate the integral formula by a weighted sum of prices of put and calls on the same underlying asset. The aim of the approximation is the implementation of the option portfolio.
Let's say at time $t=0$ one can take a static position (buy-and-hold), and the option's portfolio includes $x_i^c$, $x_i^p$ units of European call and put options, $x_i^c, x_i^p>0$ for buying, $x_i^c, x_i^p<0$ for selling, if $x_i^c$ or $x_i^p$ equal to $0$ its means that the contract does not include in the portfolio, $k^i_c$, $k^i_p$ are the corresponded call and put strikes, $i=1,2, \ldots, n$, $S_t$ is a price of the underlying asset at calendar time, $0 \le t \le T$. Then the second term at time $t=0$ can be approximated by the formula
$$f'(\kappa) [(F_T - \kappa)^+ - (\kappa - F_T)^+]\approx \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i^c (S_t - k_c^i)^{+} + x_i^p (k_p^i - S_t)^{+},$$ the first term is the value of the call option payoff and the second is the value of the put option payoff, $X^+=\max(X, 0)$.
My question is: If my intuition is correct how to specify the number $n$?
Update. How to calculate VIX
How to be with the first term $f(\kappa)$ and the third term $\int_0^{\kappa} f''(K) (K-F_T)^+ \ d K$ and the fourth term $\int_{\kappa}^{\infty} f''(K) (F_T-K)^+ \ d K$?
## Answer by Quantuple (score 3, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/30803
Carr-Madan formula tells you that the European-style payoff $f(F_T)$ can be decomposed as: $$f(F_T)=f(\kappa) + f'(\kappa) [(F_T - \kappa)^+ - (\kappa - F_T)^+] + \int_0^{\kappa} f''(K) (K-F_T)^+ \ d K + \int_{\kappa}^{\infty} f''(K) (F_T-K)^+ \ d K$$ for any positive $\kappa$ of your choice.
Assuming deterministic rates w.l.o.g. as well as a complete market, by absence of arbitrage opportunity, to generate the payoff on the RHS at $t=T$, one can enter the following (static) positions today, at $t=0$:
$$ \underbrace{\Bbb{E}_0^\Bbb{Q}\left[ e^{-rT} f(\kappa)\right]}_{(1)} + \underbrace{\Bbb{E}_0^\Bbb{Q}\left[ e^{-rT} f'(\kappa) [(F_T - \kappa)^+ - (\kappa - F_T)^+]\right]}_{(2)} + \underbrace{\Bbb{E}_0^\Bbb{Q}\left[ e^{-rT} \int_0^{\kappa} f''(K) (K-F_T)^+ \ d K\right]}_{(3)} + \underbrace{\Bbb{E}_0^\Bbb{Q}\left[ e^{-rT} \int_{\kappa}^{\infty} f''(K) (F_T-K)^+ \ d K\right]}_{(4)} $$
where by definition: $$ (1) = f(\kappa) B(0,T), \quad (2) = f'(\kappa) (C(\kappa,T)-P(\kappa,T)) $$ $$ (3) = \int_0^\kappa f''(K) P(K,T) dK,\quad (4) = \int_\kappa^\infty f''(K) C(K,T) dK $$
$(1)$ is equivalent to go long $f(\kappa)$ zero-coupon bonds $B(0,T)$, while $(2)$ corresponds to being long $f'(\kappa)$ European calls written on the future and short $f'(\kappa)$ European puts. Terms $(3)$ and $(4)$ are more tricky as, per se, they require taking positions in an infinite number of contracts, which is not practical.
As you suggest, we could therefore approximate integrals using finite sums, see the calculation of the VIX index for instance. In that case $(3)$ (the reasoning for $(4)$ is almost identical) would become: $$ \int_0^\kappa f''(K) P(K,T) dK = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{N-1} (f''(K_i) P(K_i,T) + f''(K_{i+1}) P(K_{i+1},T)) (K_{i+1}-K_i) $$ where we have used the trapezoidal rule along with ${\bf{K}}=\{ K_i \}_{i=1}^N$ a partition of the interval $[0,\kappa]$ (you could also a simple Riemann sum the idea stays the same) meaning that $(3)$ corresponds to being:
- Long $\frac{1}{2}f''(K_i)(K_{i+1}-K_i)$ puts $P(K_i,T),\quad i=1,...,N-1$
- Long $\frac{1}{2}f''(K_{i+1})(K_{i+1}-K_i)$ puts $P(K_{i+1},T),\quad i=1,...,N-1$
The tricky part in practice is really the finite number of options that actually trade, meaning that you may not have the right granularity to decently approximate the integrals in the Carr-Madan formula (discretisation error + truncation error).Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.