Skip to content
All library documents

Distinguishing FRA Options from Caplets When Selecting Interest-Rate Volatility

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Oscar
Read the original

Summary

The response clarifies that a forward rate agreement, a caplet or floorlet, and an option on an FRA are different instruments. A caplet and a floorlet on the same future LIBOR fixing have complementary single-period option payoffs and can approximately replicate an FRA, subject to settlement differences. An FRA option instead gives the holder optionality over entering a linear FRA-like exposure, so its timeline includes both the option’s expiry and the underlying FRA’s fixing and accrual period.

That distinction matters when choosing volatility: the relevant quote depends on the underlying rate tenor and the option’s timing, not simply on the label “FRA.” The response illustrates this with an option that expires before entry into a future FRA, then notes a practical challenge when market quotes exist for one LIBOR tenor but a different tenor is needed. It mentions comparing realized volatilities to estimate a tenor adjustment, but offers no validated procedure. Its discussion is framed around LIBOR and flags that risk-free-rate replacements may change volatility conventions.

Key ideas

  • An FRA is a linear exposure to a future rate fixing, while an FRA option adds optionality over that exposure.
  • A caplet and floorlet on the same fixing can approximately combine to replicate an FRA, with settlement differences.
  • Specify both option expiry and the underlying FRA fixing and tenor before selecting a volatility input.
  • Market quotes for one rate tenor may not directly supply volatility for another tenor.
  • Using realized-volatility comparisons to adjust between tenors is mentioned as a practice, not established as a standard method.

Tags

Fixed incomeOptionsDerivatives pricingVolatility
Full text
# What is the correct implied volatility to use when valuing an FRA option?


# What is the correct implied volatility to use when valuing an FRA option?












To my understanding the value of an FRA option is identical to that of a caplet of equal maturity, strike and tenor. A volatility surface of cap implied volatilities is generally available, and from that you can strip the caplet volatilities that make up each of the caps that constitute the surface. But the caplets typically have a tenor of 3 or 6 months, whereas I presume an FRA option may be of any tenor like 9 months or 3 years (is that correct?). If so how do we find what a 9 month or 3 year caplet volatility would be when all we have to go on is a cap surface built from caplets with 3 month tenors (and the stripped caplet surface)?

## Answer by KevinT (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/58619

I think it is necessary to be more precise on the terminology here, so my answer will be a bit longer.

Firstly, we need to distinguish the FRA, the FRA option and the caplet/floorlet. A FRA basically locks in a future LIBOR fixing for you, e.g., the 1x7 FRA strike allows you to lock in the 6m LIBOR that will fix in 1m from now. Note that it is a linear derivative with symmetric payoff. Anyways, here the first ambiguity can arise in terms of terminology -- what is the maturity of the FRA, and what is the tenor? I follow your notation and say that the FRA has maturity 1m and tenor 6m (as it refers to the 6m LIBOR).

Now, caplets and floorlets are single-period calls and puts on LIBORs, respectively. Hence, buying a 1m caplet and selling a 1m floorlet on the 6m LIBOR, is equivalent to a FRA (to be precise: almost equivalent -- we have some differences in settlement practices). This can be seen as some sort of put call parity for interest rate derivatives.

Lastly, here you are referring to FRA options, i.e., calls/puts not on the LIBOR itself, but rather a linear derivative thereof. As a mnemonic, you can think of it being similar to a swaption, which is an option on a IRS (another linear derivative on LIBORs). In fact, some people call FRAs single-period IRSs (although they are not 100% congruent). Either way, the optionality now brings in another dimension. For instance, you can have an option living for 2 years that allows you to enter a 1x7 FRA in 2 years from now. In this case, you would still be interested in the volatility of 6m LIBOR. But what is maturity now? The 2y maturity of the option? Or the 1m "lifetime" of the FRA? So please make sure that you're 100% clear on the timeline of this transaction and if/how caplet surface can be used for your task.

In any case, your question, however, reveals (at least to me) an interesting challenge for practicioners, namely: how can we extract the vol of a 3m LIBOR if we only have quotes on the vol of 6m LIBOR, or vice versa?

- This thread might be of interest for you in this context.

- I have also seen tries to compare 3m vs. 6m realized vols and extract a spread, which can then be applied to current market quotes to find the vol of the non-standard tenor.

As a last side note, it will be very interesting to see how the market in interest rate vols will develop once LIBORs are discontinued and replaced by overnight risk-free rates (backward vs. forward looking, and volatility "accrual" in this context).

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.