Dividend Discounting, Growth, and Expected Stock Returns
Summary
The document examines whether a dividend discount model can explain the long-run rise of broad stock markets. It starts with the constant-growth model, in which price depends on dividends, the required return, and dividend growth. It then considers adding expected price appreciation directly to the model, but the response explains that this extra term is unnecessary under the standard assumptions.
Rearranging the model shows that expected return consists of dividend yield plus dividend growth. The same result follows by projecting future dividends at a constant growth rate and comparing the expected next-period price with today’s price. This connects rising prices to growing dividends rather than to a separate appreciation term. The account is theoretical: it relies on a constant growth assumption and does not establish why growth rates or market valuations change over time, or whether broad indices will always rise.
Key ideas
- In the constant-growth dividend discount model, price reflects dividends, the required return, and dividend growth.
- Expected return in the model is the dividend yield plus dividend growth.
- With constant dividend growth, the expected next-period price rises at the dividend growth rate.
- The explanation does not establish that broad stock markets will always rise.
Tags
Full text
# Is this the reason why stock prices on the broad average always rise?
# Is this the reason why stock prices on the broad average always rise?
According to the so called Dividend Discount Model (DDM), a particular, temporary stock price is the discounted sum of all future dividends resulting from the investment:
$$P=\frac{D}{i-g}$$
$P$ is the stock price, $D$ is the dividend paid at the moment of calculation, $i$ is the cost of capital equity (interest rate), $g$ is the dividend growth rate. For a given point in time, the price $P$ is constant since the paid dividend $D$ is known and $i$,$g$ are assumed to known or well estimated. Furthermore, they are assumed to be constant. (This may not be entirely true for $g$.) Given these assumptions, the stock price is constant as long as an increase of the dividend that is not "expected" through the constant growth rate appears. On the other hand, a decrease is possible too.
The definition suggests that stocks are bought to receive dividends as cash flow. But for passive investors, the price increases of shares on a broad average are at least as important as the dividend yield. When investors assume that there will be a price increase in the future, the particular stock receives higher demand. This is why I would assume the following model:
$$P=\frac{D}{i-g}+c\dot{P}$$
In this way, the expected prise increase (over time) $\dot{P}$ is considered (with a coefficient $c$). This leads to a stock price which is not constant but grows exponentially over time (consider it as an ODE) - given a certain $DDM$ term (that is constant) and a coefficient $c$. Exponentially growth is exactly what describes broad stock markets over long time. Is this the reason why stock prices on the broad average always rise?
I know that my short explanation contains many problems:
- I do not know how to handle a not constant growth rate $g$ and I do not know what to expect (more): positive or negative growth rates $g$ and how to find out for each stock
- I know that there is a difference between the derivative of the price over time $\dot{P}$ and the expected price growth, let's call it $\dot{P}_{\text{exp}}$, but I think as a simplification, it might as a simplification.
Any ideas on that?
## Answer by Chris Taylor (score 3)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/58974
Rearranging the dividend discount model to express the required return $i$ in terms of the other variables gives
$$i = \frac{D}{P} + g$$
That is, the return to holding stocks in this model comes partly from dividends (in the form of the dividend yield $D/P$) and partly from dividend growth $g$, which will increase the stock price over time, representing another source of return for investors.
Another way to see it is to look at the dividend discount model in the form
$$ P_t = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{E(D_{t+k})}{(1+i)^k} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(1+g)^k}{(1+i)^k} D_t $$
where we have assumed that $E(D_{t+k}) = (1+g)^k D_t$. The expected price one period later is
$$ E(P_{t+1}) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(1+g)^k}{(1+i)^k}E(D_{t+1}) = (1+g)P_t $$
Therefore the expected return is
$$ E(R_{t+1}) = \frac{D_t + E(P_{t+1}) - P_t}{P_t} = \frac{D_t}{P_t} + g $$
as before.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.