Skip to content
All library documents

Duration Times Spread as Credit Factor Exposure and Specific Risk

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user2163

Summary

The document explains duration times spread (DTS) as a way to express a bond’s sensitivity to relative spread changes. It decomposes each bond’s relative spread movement into a shared sector or market component and an idiosyncratic component. Multiplying spread changes by spread duration translates those movements into approximate bond returns, making DTS a measure of exposure to the shared relative-spread factor as well as a scale for specific risk.

A second explanation builds intuition from duration: duration approximates price sensitivity to a yield shift, while spread duration applies similar reasoning to changes in credit or liquidity spread. Expressing spread moves in relative rather than absolute terms pulls the spread level into the sensitivity, producing DTS. The simple relationship is most directly applicable to vanilla fixed-rate bonds and parallel spread shifts; floaters and bonds with embedded options can behave differently. The factor interpretation also depends on how the common market or sector spread move is defined.

Key ideas

  • DTS combines spread duration with the bond’s spread level to measure sensitivity to relative spread changes.
  • A bond’s spread movement can be decomposed into a shared market component and an idiosyncratic component.
  • The shared relative-spread movement acts like a common credit factor, while DTS also scales bond-specific risk.
  • The duration analogy is simplest for vanilla fixed-rate bonds and may not hold directly for floaters or bonds with optionality.

Tags

Full text
# What's the intuition behind DTS(duration times spread) in fixed income?


# What's the intuition behind DTS(duration times spread) in fixed income?












I am having some difficulty grasping the concept of using DTS to measure credit risk. In the equity world, one typical measure of risk is beta, which is quite well-defined as the exposure to a common market factor, say S&P 500. But in credit market, it's not clear to me what the analogous common market factor would be. The original DTS paper says that DTS is the exposure to the relative spread change. However, the relative spread change can be calculated for each bond. Therefore, I have failed to see how DTS can be an exposure to some common factor. Can anyone explain exactly what DTS is measuring?

## Answer by Chris Taylor (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/40774

The DTS paper (Ben Lor, Dynkin et al) describes how DTS (duration times spread) can be used as both an exposure to a common factor, and a measure of specific risk. Assume that relative spread changes for a set of bonds $i\in I$ are described by an exposure to a common risk factor, and a specific risk, that is

$$ \frac{\Delta s_i}{s_i} = \frac{\Delta s_I}{s_I} + \frac{\Delta s^{\rm idio}_i}{s_i} $$

Then the change in spread for this bond is

$$ \Delta s_i = s_i \left( \frac{\Delta s_I}{s_I} \right) + \Delta s^{\rm idio}_i $$

That is, the spread of bond $i$ can be viewed as the beta of absolute spread changes of bond $i$ to $relative$ spread changes in the sector/market/index represented by $I$.

The return of bond $i$ is given by the spread duration multiplied by the change in spread, that is

$$ R_i = -D_i\Delta s_i = -D_is_i \left( \frac{\Delta s_I}{s_I} \right) - D_i \Delta s^{\rm idio}_i $$

The second term could also be written as $D_i s_i \times (\Delta s^{\rm idio}_i / s_i)$, so the DTS can be seen as both a "beta" to relative spread changes in the sector/market/index, as well as a measure of specific risk.

## Answer by Richi Wa (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/14904

Do you know the concept of duration? It is an approximation of how much the price of the bond changes if the interest rate (appropriate for the market in which the bond trades) changes. This is the interest rate is used to discount cash flows. It is common to all the bonds in the same market (e.g. German govis).

For various reasons (liquidity, credit risk, ...) bonds trade at a price that can not be explained by the curve of the market that it used for discounting. Then you need some extra discounting - this number, usually additive, is the spread. It is specific for the bond.

For a zero coupon bond and exponential discounting as a toy exampke you can say that the price is given by $$ P = \exp(- r T), $$ where $T$ is the time to maturity and $$ r = r_{common} + s_{specific} $$ where $r_{common}$ is the rate for the market and $s_{specific}$ is the specific spread.

If $r_{common}$ changes then you can approximate this by the usual duration if $s_{specific}$ changes then you can call this spreadduation.

For vanilla fixed rate bonds interest rate duration and spread duration are the same. For floaters or bonds with optionalities it is different.

Note that for fixed rate bonds it does not matter whether $r_{common}$ or $s_{specific}$ change. If one of these changes (by a parallel shift) by $x$ the price will by $$ P = \exp(- (r+x) T) $$ and the change in values is $$ \exp(- (r+x) T)-\exp(- rT). $$ In the case of plain vanilla bonds most of the concepts of duration analysis can be taken over to changes in spread. Essentially this is what they do.

Note that on page 2 they write that the change in price is approx. the change in spread times the duration. This is clear if we know how duration works.

If we change the wording from absolute numbers (spread widens by 10 bps, say from 15 bps to 25bps) to relative numbers (spread widens from a level of 15 bps by $66\%$) then we simply pull out the spread level and look at relative changes and have $$ R = -D*s*r_s $$ where $R$ is the relative change of the bond price, D is the duration, s is the spread level and $r_s$ is the relative change of the spread level. Then we arrive at $D*s$ which is duration times spread.

## Answer by user31999 (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/38458

if equity beta is the measure of how an individual assets expected return changes wrt a change in the market equity risk premium, then duration measures the change in return to a change in the yield/return of a common market fixed-income risk factor; it is all slightly vague

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.