Estimating a Company’s Liquid Resources for M&A
Summary
The document explains how to estimate a company’s financial capacity for acquisitions by examining liquid assets and debt on its balance sheet. It distinguishes this approach from subtracting all current liabilities from total assets. The example uses a quarterly filing’s cash balance and short- and long-term marketable securities to reproduce the reported total of cash and liquid investments, then compares that amount with debt to describe net cash.
The proposed concept of a war chest is the pool of assets a company can liquidate over a short period to fund initiatives. The answer identifies share buybacks, acquisitions, and dividends as possible uses of balance-sheet cash. This is an introductory financial-statement example rather than a formal measure of acquisition capacity: liquidity, debt timing, operating needs, restrictions on cash, and the cost of a transaction can affect what is actually available. The document does not give a general valuation method for determining how large an acquisition a company can afford.
Key ideas
- A company’s liquid resources can be estimated from cash and marketable investments on its balance sheet.
- Subtracting debt from liquid assets gives a net-cash measure in the example.
- The example uses figures from a specific quarterly filing to reconstruct reported liquid assets.
- Share repurchases, acquisitions, and dividends are presented as potential uses of cash.
- A balance-sheet cash estimate alone does not establish a company’s full acquisition capacity.
Tags
Full text
# How to determine how much a company can invest in M&A activity? # How to determine how much a company can invest in M&A activity? I am an engineer who is increasingly interested in business-related things, and I am reading and learning a lot about what you can derive e.g. from financial statements. One question I was wondering about is: How can I determine the size of an M&A war chest of a company? This question is inspired by the following article: http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/07/11/how-apple-can-use-its-233-billion-war-chest.aspx where they determined how big the war chest is. I am actually not able to retrace the steps, as it seems to me that the calculation was: Total Assets - Total current liabilites - but my assumption would have been that you cannot just take the entire positions? I was thinking more along the lines of: Cash+Cash equivalent+liquid short-term investments-short-term debt = war chest Is it correct to say, that the possibilities with the war chests are: 1) Share buybacks 2) M&A 3) Dividend payout Thank you for your help :) ## Answer by zglin (score 1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/31271 This is more of an introductory finance/financial statement analysis question (which isn't really home in quantfin). However, I'm happy to walk you through the analysis. From the article > When including cash and equivalents and short- and long-term investments on its balance sheet, the iPhone maker is sitting on 233 billion in cash and liquid assets. Even after subtracting 71.9 billion in debt, Apple still has 161.1 billion in net cash. Pulling AAPL Q1 10-Q (as this article came out on July 11th before the Q2 filing on July 27th), you can scroll to the consolidated balance sheet. With Cash of 21.514bn, Long term marketable securities of 177.645bn, and Short term marketable securities of 33.769 bn, you get the 232.92 billion sitting in cash and cash equivalents. You are correct in that broadly speakig a war chest is whatever a company can liquidate in a short term basis to pay for various initiatives. From a corporate governance perspective, share buybacks, M&A, dividends are the only appropriate uses of cash sitting on the balance sheet (which is why AAPL paid out a special dividend several years back).
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.