Skip to content
All library documents

Estimating a Sharpe Ratio from a Single Return

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user2991243

Summary

The document considers whether a Sharpe ratio can be estimated from just one observed return, when the usual sample standard deviation cannot be calculated. It proposes treating the excess return as a rough proxy for dispersion under a zero-drift assumption, then illustrates the estimate using an asset return of 0.1 and a risk-free return of 0.2. The example produces a negative ratio because the asset underperforms the benchmark.

The answer also discusses annualization: logarithmic returns scale with time, while their standard deviation scales with the square root of time. It notes that percentage returns may need conversion or geometric compounding. An addendum suggests adjusting a one-sample estimate using normal-distribution relationships involving mean or median absolute deviations. These are approximations, not a reliable substitute for a return series; with one observation, sample moments may be undefined, and the assumptions about drift and distribution are consequential.

Key ideas

  • A single observation does not provide a conventional sample standard deviation for a Sharpe ratio.
  • The answer proposes using the magnitude of excess return as a rough dispersion proxy under a zero-drift assumption.
  • The example yields a negative estimated ratio because the asset return is below the risk-free return.
  • Annualized logarithmic returns scale with time, while logarithmic volatility scales with the square root of time.
  • Distribution-based adjustment factors depend on assumptions and do not resolve the lack of sample data.

Tags

Full text
# Calculate Sharpe ratio for only one return


# Calculate Sharpe ratio for only one return












I have only one return for calculating sharp ratio. As you know, we should calculate standard deviation of returns and standard deviation of one item is 0. Suppose that the single return is 0.1 and the risk less return is 0.2. How can I calculate sharp ratio for these two inputs?

## Answer by David Addison (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33634

For a single period return, the squared value of that return approximates variance (i.e., the absolute value approximates the standard deviation).

Standard deviation is defined thus:

$$\sigma_X = \sqrt\frac{\Sigma_1^N\mathbb{E}[X-\mu_x]^2}{N}$$

For a non-drifting process, $\mu_x = 0$. Also, in our scenario, $X = (r_a - r_m)$ and $N = 1$.

Therefore, an approximation of the Sharpe ratio should be:

$$S = \frac{r_a-r_b}{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[r_a-r_m]^2}} \approx \frac{r_a-r_m}{\mid r_a-r_b\mid} $$

Using $r_a = .1$ and $r_b = .2$, $S$ should equal $-1$.

If you need annualize the returns or standard deviation, just remember that logarithmic returns scale with $T$ and logarithmic standard deviation should scale with $\sqrt{T}$. If operating under the assumption that returns are percentages, one must convert these into logarithmic returns first and/or use geometric compounding rules.

For a related thread see: Why is $dS/S$ an estimate of realized volatility?

Addendum: A perhaps pertinent point that I missed in my original pass through is that the mean absolute error is related to the expected standard error by a factor of ${\sqrt {2/\pi }}=0.79788456\ldots$, i.e.,

> For the normal distribution, the ratio of mean absolute deviation to expected standard error is: $w=\frac{ E|X| }{ \sqrt{E(X^2)} } = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}$.

Furthermore, the median absolute error is connected with standard error by the following:

> ${\displaystyle {\hat {\sigma }}=k\cdot \operatorname {MAD} ,\,}$ where k is a constant scale factor, which depends on the distribution. For normally distributed data k is taken to be: ${\displaystyle k=1/\left(\Phi ^{-1}(3/4)\right)\approx 1.4826}$

Therefore, one could improve the estimate of the single-sample Sharpe ratio by multiplying it by $\approx [.67,\, .8]$. Both answers seem like the right one, unless of course, one argues that sample moments are undefined for a single sample space.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.