Estimating Average Power from a Gradual Gravitational Energy Release
Summary
The document treats a hypothetical falling Moon as an order-of-magnitude estimation problem. The proposed approach estimates the Moon's mass from rough size and density comparisons, approximates the gravitational potential energy released as it approaches Earth, and divides that energy by the stated 5,000-year timescale to obtain average power. It then compares the result with solar input to judge which is larger.
The answer relies on coarse assumptions and contains acknowledged uncertainty in the estimates and in how much potential energy becomes heat. It also points out that some energy could change the Earth-Moon system's angular momentum and Earth's rotation. A second response summarizes the comparison method: estimate gravitational energy and average power, estimate solar power on Earth's illuminated half, then compare. The exchange is a useful example of dimensional reasoning, but it is not a precise physical calculation or a trading method.
Key ideas
- Estimate average power by dividing released energy by the time over which it is released.
- Gravitational potential energy provides a rough way to quantify energy released as the Moon approaches Earth.
- Compare the resulting power with solar input using estimates on a common basis.
- The result depends on rough assumptions and on how the released energy is distributed.
Tags
Full text
# Preparation for interview: influx of power of the moon
# Preparation for interview: influx of power of the moon
I am preparing myself for an interview for a quantitative analyst position and one of the sample questions asked in previous examinations was:
"Suppose the moon were to disintegrate, and fall to earth over 5000 years. How does this influx of power compare to that of the Sun? Much more, about the same, or much less?"
My idea was to consider the moon as a star and compute its hypothetical flux of energy, but the "fall to earth over 5000 years" puzzles me a bit.
How would you approach the problem?
Thanks
## Answer by will (score 5, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/26231
Here's how i'd have at it;
`*` I happen to know these are okay guesses.
`**` Let's assume it's just the potential energy, and that as the point of the "5000 years" part of the question.
- The moon came from the earth - likely it's crust since the idea is that it was formed from an impact. The crust of the earth is less dense than the core, so the moon is less dense than the earth. Call it 60% density.
- The moon is about the same size as a finger nail at arms length.
- The moon is 240,000 miles away*, my arms are just under 3ft long, and a finger nail is ~1cm in diameter. There are ~5000ft in a mile. Therefore the moon's diameter is `240000 x 5000/3 = 4000km` diameter.
- The earth's radius is 6000km, so it's radius is 3 that of the moon. $3^3$ is 27 => the earth weights `27/0.6 = 45 ~= 50` times more than the moon.
- The earth weights 10$^{25}$Kg*.
- potential energy is $mgh$. By disintegrating the moon and slowly(5000 years) bringing it down to the earth, we'll be gaining at least it's potential energy**. So this will be $10^{25}\mathrm{Kg} / 50 \cdot 9.8\mathrm{ms}^{-2} \cdot 240000\mathrm{miles} = 9.8 \cdot 240000 \cdot 10^{25} / 50 \mathrm{Kg\ m\ miles\ s}^{-2} = 10^{34} K m^2 s^{-2} = 10^{33} J$.
- There are $365\ 3600\ 24 =\ \sim30,000,000$ seconds in a year. Power = $ 10^{33}J / (30000000 \cdot 5000) = 10^{23}W$
- Now we go back to the earth bits for a bit, remembering that number. The radius of the earth is 6000Km. So the surface area is $4 \ \pi \ r^2 = 4 \ \pi \ 6000000^2 = \pi\ 1.32\mathrm{E}^{14} = 5\mathrm{E}^{15}\ \mathrm{m}^2$
- Energy per square meter = $2\cdot10^{7}\ \mathrm{W}$.
- It takes 1 calorie to raise 1cm$^3$ of water by 1 degree. 1 calorie is 4.2J. So per square meter of the earth, we have enough energy to raise $5\mathrm{E}^6 \mathrm{ml}$ of water by a degree every second. Or, enough to (raise to a) boil*** $50\ell$ of water per second per square meter.
So i'd be saying a lot more.
Now, that seems like a lot. It's obviously more that the sun puts out. I'm not sure if i've made any horrible msitakes in here, i'll check later - i'm about to go home. A quick sanity check though, yields that the Vredefort crater was created by a metoer thought ot have been ~15-20 km in diameter. And that you would have to carve 150 lumps this size from the moon per day to whittle it down to nothing in 5000 years.
So that is a lot of mass that's getting dumped onto the earth each day. Granted, it won't be going as fast, but there's still a lot of substance.
This also makes the assumption that all of the potential energy is converted to heat. I don't think this is likely - what will likely happen is that it will change the angular momentum of the earth such that the total angular momentum of the system stays the same. If you look at the sun and the moon from celestial north, the earth orbits the sun, the moon orbits the earth, and both the earth and the moon rotate - all anti clockwise. Pulling in the moon will make the earth rotate faster and decrease the length of the day.
`***` ignoring that the energy required to heat water is not constant
You also need to ask why it's falling to earth?
## Answer by Juan (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/45842
Based on the way the question is phrased, the simplest approach is:
1) Estimate the gravitational potential energy of the Earth-Moon system. 2) Use result from 1) to estimate an average power as Energy/time. 3) Estimate the solar power on the illuminated half of the Earth. 4) The comparison of the result in 2) and 3) allows you to judge relative magnitude.
Some of these steps were indicated in other responses, but there are a few errors.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.