Estimating Default Probability from CDS Spreads and Recovery
Summary
The document explains how to estimate risk-neutral default probability from a credit default swap spread, maturity, and assumed recovery rate, and how to invert the calculation to obtain a spread from a probability. Under a flat spread and constant recovery assumption, the basic approximation relates annual default intensity to spread divided by loss given default. Integrating a constant hazard rate yields a cumulative default probability that rises nonlinearly with time.
The answers distinguish this exponential form from a simpler per-period approximation and describe the hazard-rate interpretation. They also caution that the relationship is imperfect: it abstracts from detailed pricing features and becomes less reliable near distressed-credit boundary conditions. The document mentions that more exact treatments are available, but supplies no paper details or empirical comparison. The result is a useful first-pass conversion, whose inputs and assumptions should be made explicit in any credit analysis.
Key ideas
- With flat spread and constant recovery, the implied hazard rate is approximated by spread divided by one minus recovery.
- A constant hazard rate implies cumulative default probability of one minus the exponential of negative hazard times maturity.
- The inverse relationship gives the spread from cumulative default probability, maturity, and recovery.
- The estimate is risk-neutral and depends on simplifying assumptions.
- The approximation can be unreliable near distressed-credit boundary conditions.
Tags
Full text
# How to compute the implied probability of default from a CDS spread?
# How to compute the implied probability of default from a CDS spread?
I have two tasks:
- Given country's CDS spread draw implied probability of default.
- Given probability of default calculate CDS spread.
If possible, refer to any papers.
## Answer by Chase van der Rhoer (score 16)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/24503
Risk-neutral default probability implied from CDS is approximately $P=1-e^\frac{-S * t}{1-R}$, where $S$ is the flat CDS spread and $R$ is the recovery rate.
The CDS Spread can be solved using the inverse:
$$S=\ln(1-P) \frac{R-1}{t}$$
- $S$ is the spread expressed in percentage terms (not basis points)
- $t$ are the years to maturity
- $R$ is the recovery rate in percentage terms
Hulls equation is a gross simplification. This equation is not perfect, but is far more accurate and works for all tenor points. It generally works well except when approaching boundary conditions (distressed credits).
## Answer by Diego F Medina (score 15)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/35666
I believe the answer can be further improved for all those being directed here by google after 3 years.
A common way to model the default probability is by the hazard rate. As @Bob correctly mentions, a traditional requirement is for it to satisfy (see Option Futures and Other Derivatives section 23.4 in which the author discusses also other more exact approximations): $$\lambda(t)=\frac{S(t)}{1-R}.$$ This is associated with the default probability by (see Poisson Process): $$P(t,t+h)=\lambda(t)h+o(h)\,,$$ with $P(t,t+h)$ the probability of a default occurring between $t$ and $t+h$. Therefore: $$P(0,T)=\int_0^T(1-P(0,t))P(t,t+dt)=\int_0^T\lambda(t)(1-P(0,t))dt\,,$$ where the first term of the integral is "default has not occurred so far" and the second is "default occurs on the next time step". This means that $P$ satisfies: $$\frac{dP(0,t)}{dt}=\lambda(t)(1-P(0,t)).$$ If the CDS is assumed to be constant then $\lambda$ is constant and a solution would be: $$P(0,t)=1-\exp\left(\frac{-St\,\,\,}{1-R}\right).$$ Equivalently solution for the CDS is: $$S=\frac{R-1}{t}\log(1-P(0,t)).$$
## Answer by Bob Jansen (score 9)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/15993
The chapter in Hull on Credit Risk gives the same formula as emcor as a first approximation with a justification:
> Consider first an approximate calculation. Suppose that a bond yields 200 basis points more than a similar risk-free bond and that the expected recovery rate in the event of a default is 40%. The holder of a corporate bond must be expecting to lose 200 basis points (or 2% per year) from defaults. Given the recovery rate of 40%, this leads to an estimate of the probability of a default per year conditional on no earlier default of $0.02/(1-04)$, or 3.33%. In general $$ \bar{\lambda} = \frac{s}{1-R}$$ where $\bar{\lambda}$ is the average default intensity (hazard rate) per year, $s$ is the spread of the corporate bond yield over the risk-free rate, and $R$ is the expected recovery rate.
This formula can easily be rewritten as $$s = \bar{\lambda} (1 -R)$$ as pointed out by @emcor.
User @lakesh pointed in a deleted question to a blog by Donald van Deventer that analyses this formula and he rejects it.
Both Hull and van Deventer remark that this formula is an imperfect approximation. It makes sense but there are some caveats and a number of improvements can be made and Hull gives one you can readily do yourself. What is best probably depends on the goal of the study.
## Answer by emcor (score 5)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/15989
From this research from Deutsche Bank, : $$p_{def}=\frac{CDS_{spread}}{1-Rec}$$ $$\Leftrightarrow CDS_{spread}=p_{def}(1-Rec)$$ where $Rec$ is the recovery rate in case of default.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.