Skip to content
All library documents

Estimating Expected Shortfall for Heavy-Tailed Portfolio Losses

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Good Guy Mike

Summary

The document presents an empirical estimator for expected shortfall from Monte Carlo samples. It uses ordered simulated outcomes to estimate the relevant quantile and averages the observations in the tail, with a fractional contribution from the observation at the boundary. This approach can be used when a portfolio’s joint distribution is difficult to calculate directly, even if models for its underlying instruments are available.

The discussion highlights slow convergence of the empirical estimate and asks how to improve accuracy, especially for heavy-tailed distributions. Replies point to importance sampling and stratified sampling applied after approximating the loss distribution with a quadratic function of risk factors. A delta-gamma model is suggested as a way to construct such a reduced model; importance sampling also requires weighting observations appropriately. The cited paper’s numerical results are described favorably, but the respondent had not implemented its method. Another reply reports practical implementation of the reduced-model approach, while noting that usefulness depends on the application. The document offers suggestions rather than a direct comparative evaluation for empirical expected shortfall.

Key ideas

  • Empirical expected shortfall can be estimated by sorting simulated outcomes and averaging the tail, including a fractional boundary observation.
  • The estimator may converge slowly as the Monte Carlo sample grows.
  • Importance sampling and stratified sampling can reduce simulation variance when paired with a suitable reduced loss model.
  • A quadratic delta-gamma approximation is one proposed way to build that reduced model.
  • Importance sampling requires weights that account for the sampling distribution.

Tags

Full text
# Estimation of Empirical Expected Shortfall of a heavy tailed distribution


# Estimation of Empirical Expected Shortfall of a heavy tailed distribution












Assume that you have a portfolio for which you have estimated a parametric model to the underlying instruments, but the distribution of the portfolio as a whole is too complicated to compute explicitly. Now you want to determine the expected shortfall by Monte Carlo simulations.

We know that for our r.v. $Y$ the empirical cdf can be estimated by $$\hat{F}_Y(y)=\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i=1}^n I(Y_i \leq y)$$ and the quantiles can be estimated by $$\hat{y}_q=\text{inf}[y:\hat{F}_Y(y)\ge q] =\Upsilon_{[nq]+1}$$ where $\Upsilon_i$ is the i:th order statistic. Thus the ES can be estimated by $$\widehat{ES}_p(Y) = \frac{1}{p}\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{[np]}\frac{\Upsilon_i}{n}+\left(p-\frac{[np]}{n}\right)\Upsilon_{[np]+1}\right)$$

However, as we will see for this numerical approximation is that it converges very slow for increasing sample size N! This is illustrated with an example where the random variable Y is standard normal (the x axis is N/100)

Maybe you could naively repeat the simulation for fixed N (sufficiently large, eg. ~200*100) and then take the mean. But isn't there any other techniques that deal with this problem (especially in the case of heavy tails)? I've managed to find several different methods, for example using control variates, importance sampling, delta-gamma approximation etc. But none of these doesn't apply to the case of empirical ES.

All comments, including references to articles, are welcome!

## Answer by user1157 (score 5)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10039

Glassermann et al. have published an approach where the loss distribution is approximated by a quadratic function in the risk factors. Based on this estimation they can apply importance sampling and stratified sampling to reduce the variance of the monte carlo estimate. I have not implemented their technique, but their numerical results look very good.

You can find the paper here: "Variance reduction techniques for estimating Value-at-Risk", R. Glassermann, P. Heidelberger, and P. Shahabuddin, Management Science, 46(10), p. 1349-1364, 2000.

## Answer by g g (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10068

The best approach depends very much on your specific requirements and constraints. For example if you know a importance sampling distribution, you can estimate ES but you need to weight the observations in the empirical distribution much as you do when using the MC-estimator for the expectation see these slides. I never really found importance sampling in practice useful though.

I did successfully implement the approach considered here. The "reduced model" which is necessary for this can be derived from a delta-gamma model, i.e. quadratic approximation model.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.