Skip to content
All library documents

Estimating Implied Risk Aversion from the MPPM

Article Quant Q&A · Author: SwiftMo

Summary

The document presents the Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure (MPPM), a risk-adjusted portfolio performance statistic based on the average of relative gross returns raised to a power determined by a risk-aversion parameter. It describes the measure as a premium return relative to the risk-free rate and notes that its calculation does not require a specified return distribution. The cited paper is described as finding MPPM rankings more resistant to deliberate performance manipulation than several familiar performance measures.

The questioner proposes reversing the usual calculation: set the MPPM to zero and solve for the implied relative risk aversion coefficient. They outline a second-order approximation in terms of average excess return and sample variance, yielding an approximate estimator, and ask how to derive its large-sample distribution. The document does not provide an answer or establish asymptotic results. Any inference from the approximation would depend on assumptions about the return process and the validity of the approximation, which are not developed here.

Key ideas

  • MPPM evaluates returns relative to the risk-free rate using a risk-aversion parameter.
  • The measure is presented as distribution-free with respect to the assumed form of portfolio returns.
  • The question proposes solving for the risk-aversion parameter that makes estimated MPPM zero.
  • A second-order approximation expresses the estimate using mean excess return and sample variance.
  • The document poses, but does not resolve, the estimator’s asymptotic distribution.

Tags

Full text
# Proving the asymptotic distribution of Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure (MPPM) (Paper by Goetzmann et al.)


# Proving the asymptotic distribution of Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure (MPPM) (Paper by Goetzmann et al.)












In Goetzmann et al.'s (2007) paper, the authors derive a "Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure" (MPPM), which is a performance measure that is impervious to performance manipulation by fund managers. The authors show that rankings based on MPPM are much more resistant to intentional performance manipulation relative to other popular measures such as the Sharpe ratio, Information ratio, Jensen's alpha etc. Specifically, the MPPM of a portfolio is given by:

$$\widehat{\Theta}(\rho) = \frac{1}{(1-\rho)\Delta t} \ln\left(\frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=1}^T \left(\frac{1+r_t}{1+rf_t}\right)^{1-\rho} \right) \ \ \ \ \cdots \ (1)$$

where:

$T =$ total number of observations

$\Delta t =$ length of time between observations

$r_t =$ portfolio's annualized rate of return at time $t$

$rf_t =$ risk-free rate at time $t$

$\rho =$ can be interpreted as the coefficient of relative risk aversion

$\widehat{\Theta}$ can be interpreted as the portfolio's premium return after adjusting for risk, i.e, the portfolio has the same "score" (ranking) as a risk-free asset whose continuously compounded return exceeds the risk-free rate by $\widehat{\Theta}$. Also, note that $\widehat{\Theta}$ does not require any specific distribution for the portfolio returns, $r_t$.

Question: I am trying to derive the asymptotic properties of a modified version of this MPPM. More specifically, instead of assuming a value for $\rho$ and computing the corresponding MPPM (as was done by Goetzmann et al.), my approach is to set $\widehat{\Theta} = 0$ and compute the implied relative risk aversion coefficient (IRRAC), $\hat{\rho}$. Calculating IRRAC from Eqn.$(1)$ is relatively straightforward using Newton–Raphson method or other linear optimization methods. However, I am not sure where to begin to derive the large sample (asymptotic) properties of IRRAC. More formally, as $T \rightarrow \infty$, what can we say about $\hat{\rho}$ where $\hat{\rho}$ satisfies $\widehat{\Theta}(\hat{\rho}) = 0$?

Attempt: My attempt so far has been related to a 2nd order linear approximation to Eqn.$(1)$ rather than working directly with Eqn.$(1)$. Using Taylor series expansion and properties of the Generalized Mean, we can show that:

$$\widehat{\Theta}(\rho) \approx \frac{1}{\Delta t} \left[\overline{x} + \frac{1-\rho}{2} \left(s_x^*\right)^2\right] \ \ \ \ \ \cdots \ (2)$$

where:

$\overline{x} = \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=1}^T x_t$ where $x_t = r_t - rf_t$, i.e, the excess return of the portfolio at time $t$.

$\left(s_x^*\right)^2 = \left(\frac{T-1}{T}\right)s_x^2$ where $s_x^2 = \frac{1}{T-1}\sum_{t=1}^T (x_t - \overline{x})^2$, i.e, the sample variance of the excess return of the portfolio at time $t$.

From Eqn.$(2)$, an approximation to $\hat{\rho}$ is given by:

$$\hat{\rho} \approx \frac{2\overline{x}}{\left(s_x^*\right)^2} +1 $$

Can we somehow derive the asymptotic distribution of $\hat{\rho}$ from this approximation?

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.