Estimating Implied Volatility for Options on Different Futures
Summary
The document asks how to estimate implied volatility for an American option on a deferred commodity futures contract when the option expires on the date associated with a nearer futures contract. It distinguishes volatility by both option expiration and underlying futures maturity. The response argues that the volatility for the nearer-expiring option on the deferred contract is a separate quantity: the known options do not determine it without additional assumptions. Volatility term structure and differences in the behavior of near and distant futures both matter; longer-dated futures may respond less to current information, a pattern known as the Samuelson effect.
A second response suggests interpolating total variance, using variance’s assumed linear growth with time under lognormal returns, to estimate an intermediate volatility. That shortcut combines observed variances with time weights, but it does not resolve the independent futures-maturity dimension. It also notes that American exercise may require an early-exercise premium adjustment. The document gives no market data or validation, so the interpolation is an assumption-based estimate rather than a generally determined implied volatility.
Key ideas
- Option volatility depends on both the option expiration and the maturity of its underlying futures contract.
- Volatility quotes for different futures maturities are generally independent without additional assumptions.
- Nearer futures may be more responsive to current information than longer-dated futures, consistent with the Samuelson effect.
- An intermediate volatility can be estimated by interpolating total variance under a lognormal, linear-variance assumption.
- American options may require an adjustment for early-exercise premium, and the proposed interpolation is not validated by market evidence.
Tags
Full text
# Options on Futures: Estimating implied volatility
# Options on Futures: Estimating implied volatility
In a commodities futures market, where there are options for the terminal expiry, whose implied volatility can be determined, I am interested in understanding what the implied volatility for an early-expiry option would be. To explain this better it might be easier:
- I have the Z american option on the Z contract
- I have the U american option on the U contract
for which I can estimate both their implied and historical volatilities.
However, what would be the implied volatility for an american option based on the Z contract but expiring at the same time as the U contract?
Thank you!
## Answer by nbbo2 (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/80225
Let's use the notation IV(option expiration date; futures expiration date) to refer to the implied volatility for an option expiring at "option expiration date" with underlying equal to the contract expiring at "futures expiration date". U refers to a known date in September and Z is a known date in December.
I would argue that IV(Z, Z), IV(U, U) and IV(U, Z) are three independent numbers and that neither can be computed from the other two (unless you make drastic simplifying assumptions).
IV(Z, Z) and IV(U, Z) reference the same contract but are unlikely to be the same unless you assume a flat time structure of volatility.
IV(U, U) and IV(U, Z) reference the same option expiration date, but refer to two different contracts, which are unlikely to have the same volatility. Generally (but not always) longer term futures respond less to current information and are therefore less volatile than nearer to expiration futures (this is sometimes called the Samuelson hypothesis (or Samuleson effect) of futures markets).
So I think the problem you pose has no solution ;)
## Answer by Rojolithos (score 0)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/80223
We can use the fact that variance scales linearly with time under the assumption of log-normal returns
$$\text{Var} = \sigma^2 \cdot T$$
To estimate intermediate volatility, we have to use the total variance and interpolate it.
We do this by taking a time-weighted average of the known variances:
$$\sigma_{\text{interpolated}}^2 = \frac{T_{U}}{T_{Z}} \sigma_{Z}^2 + \left(1 - \frac{T_{U}}{T_{Z}}\right) \sigma_{U}^2$$
With $$\frac{T_{U}}{T_{Z}}: \text{Proportion of the time until } T_{U} \text{ relative to } T_{Z}.$$
$$\left(1 - \frac{T_{U}}{T_{Z}}\right): \text{Remaining proportion relative to } T_{Z}.$$
However, because it's an American option you theoretically should account for some early exercise premium adjustmentShown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.