Skip to content
All library documents

Estimating Risk-Neutral Probabilities from Vertical Spread Prices

Article Quant Q&A · Author: JosephDing

Summary

The document explains how prices of nearby-strike European options can approximate the risk-neutral probability that the underlying finishes on one side of a strike. A put price is expressed as a discounted integral of its payoff over the risk-neutral terminal-price distribution. Differentiating with respect to strike links the put-price slope to the probability of finishing below that strike; the call-price slope gives the corresponding upper-tail probability.

A vertical spread uses prices at discrete strikes, so its price difference acts as a finite-difference approximation to that slope. The post's proposed odds-style expression is therefore an approximation, with the midpoint interpretation relying on strikes that are close together. Put-call parity supports applying the idea to calls as well. The document also notes that a second strike derivative can estimate the risk-neutral density. These are risk-neutral probabilities inferred from option prices, not necessarily real-world forecasts, and discrete strike spacing limits precision.

Key ideas

  • A put's strike-price derivative is proportional to the risk-neutral probability of finishing below the strike.
  • A call's strike-price derivative corresponds to the discounted probability of finishing above the strike.
  • Vertical spread prices approximate these derivatives using finite differences across available strikes.
  • A second strike derivative can be used to estimate the risk-neutral probability density.
  • The probabilities are risk-neutral and the spread-based estimate is approximate.

Tags

Full text
# Use Options Vertical Spreads to Find Probability of Distribution


# Use Options Vertical Spreads to Find Probability of Distribution












I saw this interesting argument that you can use the value of a put spread to find the approximate market implied probability of underlying finishing below the mid point of the two strikes, assuming the distance of strikes and DTE are reasonably small.

Namely, for two put options on the same underlying with strikes $K_2>K_1$ and stock price at expiry $S_T$, we have

$$ \frac{P(S_t,K_2)-P(S_t,K_1)}{(K_2-K_1)-\big(P(S_t,K_2)-P(S_t,K_1)\big)}\approx P(S_T<\frac{K_2+K_1}{2}) $$

In other words, the odds you get for buying a put spread equals to the probability of stock finishing below mid of strikes.

My question is how to derive this result, and does it applies to call spreads as well.

## Answer by Kermittfrog (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/83833

This is a standard result in quantitative finance for vanilla (i.e. European style) options. It can be applied to puts as well as calls (thru put-call-parity).

Expressing the put option price as a function of the risk neutral density $q(S_T)$, it is calculated as:

$$ P(S_t,K)=e^{-r(T-t)}\int_0^{\infty}(K-S_T)^+q(S_T)\mathrm{d}S_T $$

The first derivative of this expression with respect to $K$ is

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\partial P}{\partial K}&=e^{-r(T-T)}\int_{0}^{K}q(S_T)\mathrm{d}S_T\\ &=e^{-r(T-t)}\mathrm{P_Q}\left(S_T\leq K\right) \end{align} $$ with $\mathrm{P_Q}\left(S_T\leq K\right)$ the risk neutral probability the put being in the money. For call options, we get a like result

$$ \begin{align} C(S_t,K)&=e^{-r(T-t)}\int_0^{\infty}(S_T-K)^+q(S_T)\mathrm{d}S_T\\ \frac{\partial C}{\partial K}&=-e^{-r(T-T)}\int_{K}^{\infty}q(S_T)\mathrm{d}S_T\\ &=-e^{-r(T-t)}\left(1-\mathrm{P_Q}\left(S_T\leq K\right)\right)\\ &=-e^{-r(T-t)}\mathrm{P_Q}\left(S_T> K\right) \end{align} $$

with $\mathrm{P_Q}\left(S_T> K\right)$ the probability of the call option ending in the money.

You can also have a look at the standard Black-Scholes option pricing equation:

$$ \begin{align} C_{\mathrm{BS}}(S_t,K)&=S_t\mathrm{N}\left(d_1\right)-Ke^{-r(T-t)}\mathrm{N}\left(d_2\right)\\ \Rightarrow\frac{\partial C_{\mathrm{BS}}}{\partial K}&=-e^{-r(T-t)}\mathrm{N}\left(d_2\right) \end{align} $$ with $\mathrm{N}\left(d_2\right)$ the risk-neutral probability of ending in the money.

The equations iny our post are finite difference approximations to the first order derivatives above, driven by the fact that we can usually observe options prices only at discretely sampled strike prices.

You can, of course, then use second order finite difference approximations to directly approximate the probability density function thru the Breeden-Litzenberger formula.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.