Estimating Swaption Volatility for Black-76 Pricing
Summary
The document addresses how to estimate annualized volatility for a European swaption, using a 2y5y forward rate as an example. For a historical estimate, it recommends calculating the standard deviation of daily changes in the forward rate and scaling by the square root of the number of trading days in a year. Summing squared changes without centering is not presented as the preferred estimate. It also points to broker-quoted implied volatility as a better input when the aim is a reliable, executable price.
For an illiquid swaption, the discussion recommends cross-checking assumptions against traded tenors, related currencies, and the historical fit between swap curve volatility and swaption prices. It cautions that historical volatility may poorly forecast future volatility when market conditions change. The answers also note that swaption pricing may use normal volatility rather than the Black-76 lognormal convention. The guidance is qualitative and does not provide a complete calibration procedure or specify how to select a historical sample window.
Key ideas
- Estimate historical volatility from daily changes in the forward rate and annualize it using the square root of the trading-day count.
- Use market implied volatility when available for a price intended to reflect executable conditions.
- Compare estimates with liquid tenors and related currencies to assess assumptions for illiquid swaptions.
- Historical volatility can be a poor forecast when future market conditions differ from the sample period.
- Consider whether normal volatility is more appropriate than Black-76 volatility for the swaption.
Tags
Full text
# Estimation of volatility into Black-76 formula
# Estimation of volatility into Black-76 formula
I am trying to estimate the (annualized) volatility that should go into an European Swaption (such as 2y5y). Given we take the black76-formula, where the discounting is the term outside the expectation, and the pricing formula has the (a) the drift term i.e. the Forward, and (b) the distribution with the volatility term.
If I extract a time-series of the 2y5y forward rates, I would like to ask what should I use to estimate the volatility. Would it be
- he (excel) stdev function which is taking (Summation(Xi - Xmean)^2) / n; or
- the summation of the square of the realized daily moves... Summation(Xi^2)
Kind regards Kian
## Answer by oronimbus (score 3)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50078
Why are you not using broker quoted implied volatilities? E.g. ICAP and TP quote all the standard expiries & tenors. If you want a reliable (i.e. executable) price you'd be better off using implied rather than historical vol. For example USD 2y5y OIS Black vol is around 40% right now (equivalent to 350bp spot premium). If that's not a concern or available, I would use the standard deviation of daily differences, scaled by $\sqrt{T}$ (typically $T = 252$). But note that implied can either trade at a discount or premium to realised volatility.
## Answer by will (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/60200
Whenever you look at pricing something illiquid, it is important to try pricing it multiple different ways. You do this to give yourself confidence that the litany of assumptions you're making are at least somewhat valid. For the example you give above, i would consider the following:
- Do you have a well known rate curve? (i.e. are all your swap rates well known?)
- Do you have any other tenors where the swaptions are traded? ` If the answer to this is yes, then you can use this liquid tenor to test your estimations. `
```
If the answer to this is yes, then you can use this liquid tenor to test your estimations.
```
- Are there other currencies with very similar looking rate curves? ` If there are, then perhaps these are candidates for proxy currencies for the volatility. `
```
If there are, then perhaps these are candidates for proxy currencies for the volatility.
```
- Are there any other currencies which are strongly correlated with the currency you're looking at? ` Same as above. `
```
Same as above.
```
- If you look at the historical volatility of other currencyies swap curves vs. the swaption markets, how well do they price? Is this accuracy a function of swaption maturity or the swap tenor? ` If the answer to this is badly, then it would errode my confidence in the methodology. Yo're looking at 2y maturity swaptions, many people make the arbitrary assumption that a good measure of the 2y expected future volatility is 2y of historical volatility. Do you think that the 2y we have just experienced will be a good estimator of the next 2y? Personally i do not. `
```
If the answer to this is badly, then it would errode my confidence in the methodology. Yo're looking at 2y maturity swaptions, many people make the arbitrary assumption that a good measure of the 2y expected future volatility is 2y of historical volatility. Do you think that the 2y we have just experienced will be a good estimator of the next 2y? Personally i do not.
```
- Is there anything going on at the moment which would cause a disconnect between historical volatilities and what we expect to happen going forwards? ` See my point above - I'm sure you've noticed that we're in the middle of a rather turbulent time. The only time when historical volatility is (IMO) a reasonable estimator of the future is when we expect the future to be exactly like the period over which we've measured the historical volatility. `
```
See my point above - I'm sure you've noticed that we're in the middle of a rather turbulent time. The only time when historical volatility is (IMO) a reasonable estimator of the future is when we expect the future to be exactly like the period over which we've measured the historical volatility.
```
Additionally, you mention black76, but you're dealing with swaptions - you may want to consider normal volatilities.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.