Skip to content
All library documents

ETF Market Making, Hedging, and Creation-Redemption Costs

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user52091

Summary

The discussion considers how an ETF market maker might earn a spread while hedging exposure with the underlying basket or a related instrument. It distinguishes capturing a favorable price difference from realizing that profit: a hedged position can remain on the firm’s balance sheet until market conditions allow the trade to be unwound. The example frames profit as dependent on the ETF and hedge execution prices, but the answer emphasizes that holding the resulting position has a financing and collateral cost.

Creation and redemption can help turn ETF shares into the underlying basket, or the reverse, and may reduce an inventory position. These operations involve costs such as custodian fees and collateral requirements, so they do not make an apparent arbitrage frictionless. The discussion is conceptual rather than a full trading model: it does not quantify all transaction, financing, or operational costs, and its illustrative figures should not be taken as universal estimates.

Key ideas

  • A market maker may hedge ETF inventory with the underlying basket or a related instrument.
  • A favorable spread or price difference does not become realized profit until the position is unwound or settled.
  • Holding a hedged position ties up collateral and can incur financing costs.
  • Creation and redemption can help manage ETF or basket inventory, but they involve fees and collateral requirements.
  • The apparent arbitrage depends on execution and holding costs, not just the quoted spread.

Tags

Full text
# ETF bid/ask spread


# ETF bid/ask spread












I was just wondering if someone could explain to me how an ETF market maker earns profit through the spread they collect while hedging the positions to be non-directional.

For example I read somewhere that: Say that ETF market maker buys ETF at bid and hedges that by shorting the basket. He then manages to offload that long position by selling at ask and flattening the hedge. From what I understand, the trader's profit = (spread earned) - (spread paid for hedge). Can someone confirm that this logic is correct? I was just wondering how this would be practical given that the basket might contain many other stocks and the trader would have to purchase all the underlying stocks of the ETF?

I was also wondering whether the creation and redemption mechanism has anything to do with the ETF market maker's operations. So back to the example above, instead of offloading the long position by selling to the trader. Is there a way to use the creation redemption mechanism to capture the bid/ask spread and to flatten the hedge? Perhaps he could redeem the ETF to obtain the underlying basket and flatten the hedge but how does he capture the bid/ask spread then?

I would appreciate if anyone could help me out with this! Thank you.

## Answer by JoshK (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/60664

Your question has two parts (at least to me):

- How do you make money hedging ETF market making vs some other product?

- How do deal with the resulting positions?

For #1, a very similar question was asked about the trading process just recently. See here for details: ETF Market Making - Locking profits via hedging

For #2, here's the problem. Let's say you lock in a good position - you buy the future for a bit less than you sell the equivalent ETF. But now you have a position - when will you realize this p/l instead of just holding securities on your balance sheet?

You really have two choices:

- Hope the market gives you a chance to reverse the trade at a profit. Downside: You are using your firm's collateral to hold this trade until then. Let's say you trade \$100m of SPY vs \$100m of futures to earn 20bps. That's great, \$200k of p/l. But if it takes three months to unwind the trade then you have just earned \$200k on \$200mm dollars over 3months - or 1.2% anualized. And most market-makers use margin and leverage and are getting charged every day on top of this.

- Create / redeem. With the redemption/creation process you turn in the ETF to the custodian (or the stock basket) and get back the underlying stocks (or get a new ETF). This might reduce your position. But, you have to consider in this case that the custodian charges a fee (\$3k for SPY) - and you have to post collateral in the interrim, which can also cost you.

So even if you can achieve perfect arbitrage, you still have friction. The create/redeem process is one technique of dealing with it - but that's not frictionless either!.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.