Fama-MacBeth Regressions with Rolling Factor Loadings
Summary
The document contrasts a two-step cross-sectional asset-pricing regression with a proposed Fama-MacBeth procedure using daily returns and monthly estimates. In the conventional setup described, time-series regressions estimate each asset’s factor loadings, then average asset returns are regressed across assets on those loadings to estimate risk premia.
The proposed rolling method estimates loadings each month from the prior year of daily data, averages those loadings across months, and uses that single average loading matrix in each period’s cross-sectional regression. The resulting period-specific risk premia are then averaged. The author reports obtaining unexpectedly unstable coefficients, despite results from the static cross-sectional approach resembling published estimates. The document is framed as a question and does not provide a resolution, derivation, or evidence that this proposed procedure is correct. It highlights that rolling windows and the timing of estimated betas and returns need careful methodological treatment.
Key ideas
- The two-step cross-sectional approach first estimates time-series factor loadings and then risk premia.
- The proposed rolling method estimates loadings from trailing daily data each month.
- The proposed procedure averages monthly loadings before estimating period-specific premia.
- The author reports unstable Fama-MacBeth coefficients but receives no methodological resolution.
Tags
Full text
# Help understand how to perform Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regression
# Help understand how to perform Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regression
I am reading Asset Pricing by Cochrane. I am struggling to do the Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regression and I am questioning my understanding of how to do this. I have no problems understanding how to do the two-step cross-sectional regression, it's the Fama-Macbeth bit that I am struggling with.
To get a bearing, let's start with cross-sectional regression. We have two steps.
## Cross-sectional regression
### Step 1: time-series regression to estimate factor loadings
For asset $i = 1, \dots, N$, perform the following regression:
$$ R_t^i = F_t \beta^i + \varepsilon_t^i $$
where $R_t^i$ is the return of asset $i$ at time $t$, $F_t$ $(1 \times K)$ row of factor values at time $t$ and $\beta_i$ is a $(K \times 1)$ factor loadings.
### Step 2: cross-sectional regression to find risk premia
So now collect $\beta_i$ into a $(K \times N)$ matrix and perform the following regression where the $\beta$ matrix is the matrix of regressors (i.e. the data matrix) and we are estimating the $(K \times 1)$ vector $\lambda$.
$$ R_E^i = \beta' \lambda + a_i $$
where $R_E^i$ is the mean return in time of asset $i$.
So far so good. I've implemented this and I get similar results to various implementations quoted in the literature.
## Fama-Macbeth
To perform a monthly Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regression estimated over a one-year rolling window on daily data I still need to do two steps like so.
### Step 1
At each month, take the past 12 months of daily data (~252 data points) and perform a time-series regression to obtain the $\beta_t$ where $t$ is the index of the month. This is exactly the same as the first step in the previous example, only we don't use the full sample but we just use a rolling 12-month window.
Do this for all months and collect the $\beta_t$ matrices. Now $\beta = \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=1}^T \beta_t$.
### Step 2
Now we have the averaged factor loadings $\beta$, we perform effectively the same as step two above for each time period but we use the average betas across all periods. In other words, we perform the following regressions:
$$ R_{E,t}^i = \beta' \lambda_t + a_t^i $$
where $R_{E,t}^i$ is the average return of asset $i$ during the last 12 months leading to month $t$ computed on daily data.
Now, take the $\lambda_t$ and average them (similarly to the betas) and that is our result.
I seem to have implemented the cross-sectional regression correctly and get similar coefficients to one published in literature. But, having implemented the Fama-Macbeth regression, I'm getting wild coefficients which I don't expect to be getting which is why I believe my understanding of what to do is wrong.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.