Skip to content
All library documents

Feller Positivity Condition for Jump-Diffusion Volatility

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Gabriele Pompa

Summary

The discussion asks whether adding positive compound Poisson jumps to a square-root stochastic volatility process changes the Feller condition for keeping variance strictly positive. The accepted answer says the diffusion condition remains unchanged: the mean-reversion drift parameters must be strong enough relative to volatility of volatility. With a positive initial variance and strictly positive jump sizes, jumps cannot move variance to zero, and between jumps the process follows the same square-root diffusion.

The reasoning is conditional on finite-rate Poisson arrivals. If the condition holds, the diffusion does not reach zero between jumps, and positive jumps preserve positivity. If it fails, there is a positive probability of an interval without jumps, during which the diffusion can reach zero. This is a qualitative argument for the stated model, not a general result for arbitrary jump distributions, intensities, or volatility dynamics. The question’s jump-adjusted long-run mean does not alter the boundary condition under these assumptions.

Key ideas

  • For the specified square-root volatility process, jumps do not modify the Feller positivity condition.
  • The result assumes positive initial variance and strictly positive jump sizes.
  • Between finite-rate Poisson jumps, the variance process follows the square-root diffusion.
  • If the diffusion condition fails, a jump-free interval can still permit variance to reach zero.
  • The conclusion may not extend to other jump distributions or volatility models.

Tags

Full text
# Do we need Feller condition if volatility process jumps?


# Do we need Feller condition if volatility process jumps?












It is fairly known that in affine processes, as Heston model \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} dS_t &= \mu S_t dt + \sqrt{v_t} S_t dW^{S}_{t} \\ dv_t &= k(\theta - v_t) dt + \xi \sqrt{v_t} dW^{v}_{t} \end{aligned} \end{equation} the SV $v_t$ is a strictly positive process if the drift is stronger enough, i.e. if drift parameters ($k$, the speed of mean-reverting, and $\theta$, mean-reverting level) and the Vol-of-Vol $\xi$ satisfy: \begin{equation} k \theta > \frac{1}{2} \xi^2 \end{equation} which is known as Feller condition. I know this condition can be generalized to multi-factor affine processes. For example, if the volatility of the returns $\log S_t$ is made of several independent factors $v_{1,t},v_{2,t},...,v_{n,t}$, then the Feller condition applies to each factor separately (check here at page 705, for example). Moreover Duffie and Kan (1996) provide a multidimensional extension of the Feller condition.

But I still don't understand if we still need the (or a sort of) Feller condition in case of jump-diffusion. You may consider for example the simple case of a volatility factor with exponentially distributed jumps: \begin{equation} dv_t = k(\theta - v_t) dt + \xi \sqrt{v_t} dW^{v}_{t} + dJ^{v}_{t} \end{equation} where $J^{v}_{t}$ is a compound Poisson process, independent of the Wiener $W^{v}_{t}$. The Poisson arrival intensity is a constant $\lambda$ with mean $\gamma$. I observe that in this case, the long term mean reverting level is jump-adjusted: \begin{equation} \theta \Longrightarrow \theta ^{*}=\theta + \frac{\lambda}{k} \gamma \end{equation} so I suspect if a sort of Feller condition applies it must depends on jumps.

Nevertheless, from a purely intuitive perspective, even if the barrier at $v_t = 0$ is absorbent, jump would pull back from 0 again.

Thanks for your time and attention.

## Answer by q.t.f. (score 4, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/15911

The Feller condition applies without modification.

That is under the assumption that $v$ is square-root process with poisson-arrival jumps (as you wrote), and assuming the jump distribution is strictly positive and initial level $v_0>0$.

The reason is, conditional on no jumps occuring, the process is just a square root process, for which the references you cite show that $v$ remains strictly positive iff $\kappa\theta>\frac{1}{2}\xi^2$. But when a jump arrives, $v$ changes level and resumes following the same process. If the Feller condition is satisfied, it can never diffuse to 0; if the jump distribution is positive it can never jump to 0. For finite arrival rate jumps that covers it: it cannot reach 0. If the Feller condition is not satisfied, since the diffusion is independent of the jump and the no jump probability is positive, even conditional on no jumps the process can reach 0. So again the condition is if-and-only-if.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.