Skip to content
All library documents

Filtered Historical Simulation VaR for Interest Rate Swap Portfolios

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Gigi B

Summary

The document outlines a filtered historical simulation approach to market risk for vanilla swap portfolios. Historical observations should be represented as changes in selected curve risk factors, such as discounting and forwarding zero rates at chosen maturities. Applying old curve levels directly to today’s swaps is not informative; instead, historical moves are replayed from current market levels to create plausible shocked curves and portfolio P&L scenarios.

One proposed implementation fits a separate GARCH volatility model to each risk-factor change series, stores standardized innovations and conditional volatilities, then resamples historical innovations to simulate future changes. The simulated changes are accumulated from today’s curve, the swaps are repriced, and repeated scenarios form a P&L distribution for risk estimation. The response allows full repricing or faster approximations based on risk measures. Results depend on risk-factor choices, the definition of rate moves, model specification, and available observations; the excerpt does not provide an empirical validation or recommend a single rate-shock convention.

Key ideas

  • Represent swap market risk with changes in curve risk factors rather than historical curve levels.
  • Replay historical moves from today’s curve to estimate changes in current portfolio value.
  • Fit conditional volatility models to risk-factor changes and resample standardized innovations.
  • Accumulate simulated changes into new yield curves, then reprice the swaps to form P&L scenarios.
  • Risk estimates depend on factor definitions, rate-move conventions, and volatility model choices.

Tags

Full text
# Filtered Historical Simulation VaR for swaps


# Filtered Historical Simulation VaR for swaps












I am trying to understand how to calculate FHS VaR for a portofolio of vanilla swaps. I think I understand the main ideas behind FHS VaR and how to implement it for other assets such as equities. I have the historical underlying yield curves for the look-back period and I was thinking to reprice the swaps for each historical scenario and calculate returns as the difference between the swaps PV from each scenario and the today's PV. Then filter returns using EWMA or GARCH. Is this the right approach ? Could you suggest some papers that describe the implementation of the FHS VaR for swaps?

Thanks!

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 4, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/68106

Let us suppose for concreteness that the 10y swap rate is 0.5% today and was 7% a year and and 6.5% a "year minus a day" ago...

> reprice the swaps for each historical scenario and calculate returns as the difference between the swaps PV from each scenario and the today's PV

This won't help you at all, really. Take a step back and consider your goal. You're looking at your book's market risk. Should you be concerned about the possibility that the market will jump from where is is today to exactly where it was a year ago? No, that's not a realistic concern and not one you should be worried about. Calculating mark to market (mtm) of your current positions directly using some historical market data will not tell you anything useful here.

Rather, you want to see how the markets moved (changed from one day to another day) historically, and calculate the P&L as the change from the mtm today to mtm if the markets move the same way starting from where they are today.

But what does "the same way" mean exactly? We see that historically, some interest rate moved from 7% to 6.5%; what would "the same" move mean today? I've seen a surprising number of people treating interest rates as equity prices - this is a (6.5-7)/7 = 7.41 decrease, so we likewise decrease today's .5% by 7.41 to get 0.464%. Others look in the change in rate - it decreased by 0.5%, so the same decrease today would be from .5% to 0. Others seek to replicate the percentage change in discount factors (i.e. in the prices of zero-coupon bonds with the same time left to maturity). Still others mix in logs in various creative ways.

(You could be looking at the change in log(1+rate) and applying the same change to today's rate.)

It doesn't help that some regulatory guidance (misguided, in my humble opinion) discuss interest rate stress ecenarios in basis points, for example https://www.fdic.gov/news/financial-institution-letters/2012/fil12002.html says:

> Management should ensure it stress tests IRR exposures using appropriate scenarios, including meaningful interest rate shocks, to identify the inherent risk. For example, in a low-rate environment, institutions should run interest rate shocks of +300 and +400 basis points. If conditions warrant, institutions should test more severe scenarios.

Once you have the perturbation, you can fully reprice your swaps under the perturbed market data (this is the most accurate if you have enough computing power) to get the perturbed mtm, and subtract the current mtm to get the P&L; or you can escimate the P&L's faster, but less accurately, from the perturbations and the risk measures.

## Answer by Kermittfrog (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/68109

Adding to Dimitris' answer (this is a too long for a comment)

Proceed as follows:

- Identify risk factors $r^{(i)}$, $i=1\ldots n$. Say the absolute returns of the pillars 1Y,2Y,...30Y of the discounting and forwarding zero rate term structures. Make sure that you have no gaps in your observations.

- Based on the time series of each risk factor, run a GARCH model $y^{(i)}_{t}-y^{(i)}_{t-1}\equiv r^{(i)}_t=\sigma^{(i)}_t\epsilon^{(i)}_t$ with $(\sigma^{(i)}_t)^2=a^{(i)}_0+\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\alpha^{(i)}_k(r^{(i)}_{t-k})^2+\beta^{(i)}(\sigma_{t-1}^{(i)})^2$, and store the time series of the pure innovation terms, $\epsilon^{(i)}_t$ as well as the $\sigma^{(i)}_t$-values.

- Prepare today's $\sigma_{t_0}^{(i)}$ and randomly draw a historical time index $\tau$, and use historical risk factor returns $\epsilon_{\tau}^{(i)}$ in order to arrive at some simulated $r^{(i)}_{t_0+1}$ for each risk factor. You can repeat this step for some time (updating all $\sigma_t^{(i)}$ along the way according to you GARCH specifications) to arrive at a series of changes for all risk factors. Then, for some time horizon $h$, you can get your simulated zero rates as $y_{t_0+h}^{(i)}=y_{t_0}^{(i)}+\sum_{k=1}^hr_{t_0+i}^{(i)}$, thereby simulating new curves.

- Price under the new curves.

- Repeat 3. + 4. for some simulation number $M$ and infer risk.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.