First-Passage Probability for a Geometric Brownian Motion
Summary
The document asks how to calculate the probability that a geometric Brownian motion starting above a lower barrier touches it by a fixed time. It maps the problem to the minimum of a drifted Brownian motion by taking logarithms, then applies a reflection-principle formula for the maximum of a drifted Brownian motion, using symmetry to express the desired probability.
The author reports probabilities above one from the proposed expression and says Monte Carlo estimates are higher, indicating a possible error in the derivation or implementation. The excerpt contains no resolution or simulation details, so it does not establish a corrected formula or validate the comparison. The barrier event must also be distinguished from the terminal price being below the barrier: touching at any time is governed by the path minimum. The result is presented as a question, with parameter scaling and the sign conventions in the formulas left open to scrutiny.
Key ideas
- Taking logarithms converts a geometric Brownian motion barrier event into a drifted Brownian motion minimum problem.
- A reflection-principle result for a drifted Brownian maximum can be related to the minimum by symmetry.
- The barrier-touch probability depends on the path minimum, not only on the terminal price.
- The reported formula produces invalid probabilities in the author’s calculations, but the excerpt gives no corrected derivation or validated Monte Carlo evidence.
Tags
Full text
# Law of a geometric brownian motion first hitting time (formula dont match Monte Carlo Simulation)
# Law of a geometric brownian motion first hitting time (formula dont match Monte Carlo Simulation)
I posted this question before on MSE
> I need to use it in a small step in the middle of a simulation and I think I'm not getting correct results to this probabilities and so for my all subsequent simulation. Could someone please check my results and my proof below?
I would like to obtain the law of the first hitting time of a geometric Brownian motion.
More precisely, to compute $\mathbb P [\tau_B \leq T]$ where $$\tau_B := \inf\{0 \leq t \leq T: X_t \leq B \}$$
and $X = (X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a geometric brownian motion of drift $\mu$ and volatility $\sigma$ with initial condition $X_0> B$.
It's known that it can be obtained in terms of the law of the minimum/maximum of a drifted Brownian motion.
Indeed, since $X_t = X_0 \exp ((\mu -\frac{\sigma^2}{2})t + \sigma W_t )$ and $\{\tau_B\leq T\}= \{X_T^*\leq B\}$ where $X^* = (X_t^*)_{t \geq 0}$ defined by $X^*_t =\min_{t \in [0,T]} X_t$, one can write
\begin{align} \mathbb P [\tau_B \leq T]&= \mathbb P [X_T^*\leq B]\\ &= \mathbb P \left[\xi_T^{(\lambda)}\leq \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)\right] \end{align}
where $\xi_t^{(\lambda)}=\min_{s \in [0,t] }\{\bar{\mu} t+\sigma W_t \}= \min_{s \in [0,t] }\{\lambda t + W_t \}$ (last equality comes by scaling) with $\bar{\mu}=(\mu -\frac{\sigma^2}{2}) $ and $\lambda=\frac{\bar{\mu}}{\sigma^2}$.
Then one can just use the formula (see here for reference, the proof is a straightforward application of Girsanov theorem)
$$\mathbb P \left[\Lambda_T^{(\eta)}\geq x\right]=e^{2\eta x}\mathcal N\left(\frac{-x-\eta t}{\sqrt t}\right)+\mathcal N\left(\frac{-x+\eta t}{\sqrt t}\right)$$
for the law of the maximum of the drifted Brownian motion $\Lambda_t^{(\eta)} := \max_{s \in [0,t] }\{\eta t+W_t \}$. Therefore since by symmetry $\Lambda_t^{(\eta)}\overset{\mathcal L} {=} -\xi_t^{(-\eta)}$ where $\xi_t^{(\eta)} :=\min_{s \in [0,t] }\{\eta t+ W_t \}$ is the minimum of the drifted brownian motion, one can can obtain the following formula
\begin{align} \mathbb P [\tau_B \leq T]&= \mathbb P [X_T^*\leq B]\\ &= \mathbb P \left[\xi_T^{(\lambda)}\leq \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right) \right] \\ &= \mathbb P \left[-\Lambda_T^{(-\lambda)}\leq \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right) \right] \\ &=e^{2\lambda \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)}\mathcal N\left(\frac{ \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)+\sigma^2 \lambda T}{\sigma \sqrt T}\right)+\mathcal N\left(\frac{ \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)-\sigma^2 \lambda T}{\sigma \sqrt T}\right)\\ &=\left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)^{2\lambda}\mathcal N\left(\frac{ \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)+\bar{\mu} T}{\sigma \sqrt T}\right)+\mathcal N\left(\frac{ \ln \left(\frac{B}{X_0}\right)-\bar{\mu} T}{\sigma \sqrt T}\right) \end{align}
Please let me know if you notice any mistake.
I'm having values bigger than one and an unexpected shape for the function $f(B) := \mathbb P [\tau_B \leq T]$ as you can see below in the graphic (Axes $y =f(B)$ and $x =B$; here X_0= 68).
I forced it to be 1 for barrier values equal or higher than the initial value. Nonetheless I think there is still a problem with the formula not only it should be automatically 1 for $B \leq X_0$. The probabilities I have calculating it by Monte Carlo are higher than the values obtained by this formula as you can see in the second graphic bellow.
Many thanksShown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.