First-Passage Time Density for a Geometric Brownian Motion Barrier
Summary
The document derives the first-passage-time density for a price following risk-neutral geometric Brownian motion and clarifies the scaling in a standardized log-distance expression. A change of probability measure removes the drift from the Brownian motion; the reflection principle then gives the hitting-time density for the driftless process. Reweighting by the likelihood ratio restores the drift, yielding a density whose exponent contains the squared drift-adjusted distance divided by time.
It gives a second route through barrier-option valuation: express survival probability using a barrier price and the method of images, then differentiate with respect to maturity to obtain the passage-time density. The two derivations are shown to agree. The discussion is specific to the stated continuous-time diffusion assumptions and barrier setup; it does not establish the same formula for jump processes or other dynamics. It also distinguishes the passage-time density from a standardized normal-style distance, which includes a square-root-of-time denominator.
Key ideas
- Under geometric Brownian motion, barrier hitting can be reduced to Brownian motion with drift in log-price space.
- A change of measure and the reflection principle provide one derivation of the first-passage-time density.
- Differentiating a barrier survival value provides an alternative derivation of the density.
- The formula depends on the continuous diffusion assumptions and the specified barrier setup.
Tags
Full text
# First passage probability formula
# First passage probability formula
I recently read an article and they provide a formula for the first-passage probability as
$$Z = {1 \over \sigma }\left[ {\log S/{S_t} + (r - {1 \over 2}{\sigma ^2})t} \right]$$
${{S_t}}$ value of the stock at time t , $r$ ror on the stock, $\sigma $ standard deviation.
The authors ref. Feller (1971) "An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol 2. " But i have been unable to find the formula , does anyone know where this comes from and any literature where this formula is presented?
Update: Is it derived from this ? $$Z(t) = \exp \left\{ {\sigma X(t) - (\sigma \mu + {1 \over 2}{\sigma ^2})t} \right\}$$
where $$X(t) = \log S/Sc$$
update: is there a typo in their formula? after reading some literature should it not be the case that the first passage probability should be
$$Z = {1 \over \sigma \sqrt{t} }\left[ {\log S/{S_t} + (r - {1 \over 2}{\sigma ^2})t} \right]$$
Link : Feller pdf
Link Article : https://forum.wilmott.com/download/file.php?id=7750
## Answer by LocalVolatility (score 3)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33852
Their formula looks correct. As is usually the case, there are multi ways to derive this result. I will outline two of them here.
Reflection Principle & Measure Change
The solution to the risk-neutral dynamics of $S$ is
\begin{equation} S_t = S_0 \exp \left\{ \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) t + \sigma W_t^* \right\}, \end{equation}
where $W^*$ is a $\mathbb{P}^*$-Brownian motion. We have $S_t = B$ when
\begin{equation} W_t^* + \frac{1}{\sigma} \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) t = \frac{1}{\sigma} \ln \left( \frac{B}{S_0} \right). \end{equation}
Now let
\begin{equation} \lambda = \frac{1}{\sigma} \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right), \qquad \alpha = \frac{1}{\sigma} \ln \left( \frac{B}{S_0} \right) \end{equation}
and define a new probability measure $\hat{\mathbb{P}}$ equivalent to $\mathbb{P}^*$ through the Radon-Nikodym derivative process
\begin{equation} \xi_t \left( \mathbb{P}^*, \hat{\mathbb{P}} \right) = \left. \frac{\mathrm{d} \hat{\mathbb{P}}}{\mathrm{d} \mathbb{P}^*} \right| \mathfrak{F}_t = \mathcal{E}_t \left( - \int_0^\cdot \lambda \mathrm{d}W_u^* \right) \qquad \mathbb{P}^*\text{-a.s.}, \end{equation}
where $\mathcal{E}$ is the Doleans-Dade exponential martingale. It follows by Girsanov's theorem that the process $\hat{W}$ defined by
\begin{equation} \hat{W}_t = W_t^* + \lambda t \end{equation}
is a standard Brownian motion under $\hat{\mathbb{P}}$. Next, by the reflection principle for Brownian motion, PDF of the first passage time $\nu$ of $\hat{W}$ to a level $\alpha$ is given by
\begin{equation} \hat{\mathbb{P}} \left\{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \right\} = \frac{\vert \alpha \vert}{t \sqrt{2 \pi t}} \exp \left\{ -\frac{\alpha^2}{2 t} \right\} \mathrm{d}t; \end{equation}
see for example Equation (II.6.3) in Karatzas and Shreve (1991), p. 80 or Theorem 3.7.1. in Shreve (2004), p. 113. I take this result as given and you can find details on its derivation in the references. Using the abstract Bayes rule; see for example Lemma A.1.4 in Musiela and Rutkowski (2005), p. 615, we get
\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{P}^* \left\{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \right\} & = & \mathbb{E}_{\mathbb{P}^*} \left[ \mathrm{1} \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \} \right]\\ & = & \mathbb{E}_{\hat{\mathbb{P}}} \left[ \xi_t^{-1} \left( \mathbb{P}^*, \hat{\mathbb{P}} \right) \mathrm{1} \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \} \right]\\ & = & \mathbb{E}_{\hat{\mathbb{P}}} \left[ \exp \left\{ \lambda \hat{W}_t - \frac{1}{2} \lambda^2 t \right\} \mathrm{1} \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \} \right]. \end{eqnarray}
Now, when $\nu = t$ then $\hat{W}_t = \alpha$ and thus
\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{P}^* \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \} & = & \exp \left\{ \lambda \alpha - \frac{1}{2} \lambda^2 t \right\} \hat{\mathbb{P}} \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}t \}\\ & = & \frac{\vert \alpha \vert}{t \sqrt{2 \pi t}} \exp \left\{ -\frac{(\alpha - \lambda t)^2}{2 t} \right\} \mathrm{d}t. \end{eqnarray}
Note that the $\alpha - \lambda t$ term is equal to $Z$ in your reference.
Differentiating the Barrier Option Price
Let $\psi = -1$ ($\psi = +1$) indicate an upper (lower) barrier. Consider a contract with the terminal payoff $V_T = \mathrm{1} \{ \nu > T \}$. Using the method of images, it can be shown that its valuation function in terms of the time-to-maturity $\tau = T - t$ is given by
\begin{equation} \tilde{V}(S, \tau) = \mathcal{B}_B^\psi(S, \tau) - \mathcal{I} \left\{ \mathcal{B}_B^\psi(S, \tau) \right\}, \end{equation}
where
\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{B}_B^\psi & = & e^{-r \tau} \mathcal{N} \left( \psi d_-(S, B) \right),\\ d_-(S, B) & = & \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{\tau}} \left( \ln \left( \frac{S}{B} \right) + \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) \tau \right),\\ \mathcal{I} \left\{ \tilde{V}(S, \tau) \right\} & = & \left( \frac{S}{B} \right)^{2 \alpha} \tilde{V} \left( \frac{B^2}{S}, \tau \right)\\ \alpha & = & \frac{1}{2} - \frac{r}{\sigma^2};\\ \end{eqnarray}
see e.g. Buchen (2001) or Wilmott et al. (1995). Note that the option price is linked to the first passage time CDF through
\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{P}^* \{ \nu > \tau \} & = & e^{r \tau} \tilde{V}(S, \tau)\\ & = & \int_\tau^\infty \mathbb{P}^* \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}\tau \} \end{eqnarray}
and thus
\begin{equation} \frac{1}{\mathrm{d} \tau} \mathbb{P}^* \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}\tau \} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial \tau} \left\{ e^{r \tau} \tilde{V}(S, \tau) \right\}. \end{equation}
Carefully differentiating the two terms in $\tilde{V}(S, \tau)$ yields
\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial}{\partial \tau} e^{r \tau} \mathcal{B}_B^\psi(S, \tau) & = & -\psi \mathcal{N}' \left( \psi d_-(S, B) \right) \frac{1}{2 \sigma \tau \sqrt{\tau}} \left( \ln \left( \frac{S}{B} \right) - \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) \tau \right) \end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial}{\partial \tau} e^{r \tau} \mathcal{I} \left\{ \mathcal{B}_B^\psi(S, \tau) \right\} & = & -\psi \left( \frac{S}{B} \right)^{2 \alpha} \mathcal{N}' \left( \psi d_-(B, S) \right) \frac{1}{2 \sigma \tau \sqrt{\tau}} \left( \ln \left( \frac{B}{S} \right) - \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) \tau \right). \end{eqnarray}
Through some tedious algebra, we can show that
\begin{eqnarray} \left( \frac{S}{B} \right)^{2 \alpha} \mathcal{N}' \left( \psi d_-(B, S) \right) & = & \mathcal{N}' \left( \psi d_-(S, B) \right)\\ & = & \mathcal{N}' \left( d_-(S, B) \right). \end{eqnarray}
Consequently,
\begin{eqnarray} \frac{1}{\mathrm{d} \tau} \mathbb{P}^* \{ \nu \in \mathrm{d}\tau \} & = & \frac{-\psi \ln (B / S)}{\sigma \tau \sqrt{\tau}} \mathcal{N}' \left( d_-(S, B) \right). \end{eqnarray}
It is easy to check that this is the same expression that we obtained before.
References
Buchen, Peter W. (2001) "Image Options and the Road to Barriers," Risk Magazine, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 127-130
Karatzas, Ioannis and Steven E. Shreve (1991) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus: Springer, 2nd edition.
Musiela, Marek and Marek Rutkowski (2005): Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling: Springer.
Shreve, Steven E. (2004) Stochastic Calculus for Finance II - Continuous Time Models: Springer.
Wilmott, Paul, Sam Howison and Jeff Dewynne (1995) The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives: Cambridge University PressShown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.