Skip to content
All library documents

Forward Bond Prices and Forward-Measure Caplet Valuation

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Jan Stuller

Summary

The document distinguishes a forward price of a zero-coupon bond from the bond’s future spot price, then applies that distinction to valuing a caplet whose payoff is fixed at the start of its interest period. A forward bond price is the expectation of the later bond price under the earlier bond’s forward measure; it is not the future bond price itself.

The attempted simplification fails because the inverse future bond price inside the expectation is random at the valuation date and cannot be taken outside. The discussion uses a change of numeraire to relate expectations under the two forward measures. It concludes that a forward bond price is a martingale under its own maturity measure, while a forward interest rate is a martingale under the measure associated with the end of its accrual period. The explanation is conceptual and does not provide a calibrated model or numerical example.

Key ideas

  • A forward zero-coupon bond price is an expectation of the future bond price under the corresponding forward measure.
  • A future bond price that remains random cannot be moved outside an expectation at an earlier date.
  • Changing the numeraire changes the probability measure and the weighting inside the expectation.
  • Forward bond prices and forward interest rates have martingale properties under different forward measures.

Tags

Full text
# Forward starting zero-coupon bonds


# Forward starting zero-coupon bonds












We trivially have that:

$$\frac{Z(t_0,t_1)}{Z(t_0,t_2)}=1+\tau L(t_0,t_1,t_2)$$

Where $L(t_0,t_1,t_2)$ is the forward Libor between $t_1$ and $t_2$, as of $t_0$.

Simply inverting this relationship then yields:

$$\frac{Z(t_0,t_2)}{Z(t_0,t_1)}=\frac{1}{1+\tau L(t_0,t_1,t_2)}$$

Could one interpret $\frac{1}{1+\tau L(t_0,t_1,t_2)}$ as a forward starting zero-coupon bond between $t_1$ and $t_2$, as of $t_0$?

I.e.:

$$\frac{Z(t_0,t_2)}{Z(t_0,t_1)}=Z(t_0,t_1,t_2)$$

If the above is true, then suppose we want to value a Caplet "set in arrears" (i.e. pay-off described in my last question).

This caplet pays $(L(t_1,t_1,t_2)-K)^{+}$ at time $t_1$. Valuing this caplet at $t_0$, choosing $Z(t_0,t_2)$ as Numeraire, we have:

$$C(t_0, T=t_1)=Z(t_0,t_2)\mathbb{E}^{t_2}_{t_0}\left[\frac{(L(t_1,t_1,t_2)-K)^{+}}{Z(t_1,t_2)}\right]$$

Using the identity:

$$Z(t_0,t_2)=Z(t_0,t_1)Z(t_0,t_1,t_2)$$

I get:

$$C(t_0, T=t_1)=Z(t_0,t_1)Z(t_0,t_1,t_2)\mathbb{E}^{t_2}_{t_0}\left[\frac{(L(t_1,t_1,t_2)-K)^{+}}{Z(t_1,t_2)}\right]=\\=Z(t_0,t_1)\mathbb{E}^{t_2}_{t_0}\left[(L(t_1,t_1,t_2)-K)^{+}\right]$$

And the problem at hand now seems trivial, since $L(t_1,t_1,t_2)$ is a martingale under $Z(t_0,t_2)$.

The above cannot be correct, since the answer is different to what @Gordon derived in my previous question linked above. So where have I gone wrong here?

## Answer by ir7 (score 4, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/61708

$Z(t_0,t_1,t_2)$ is the $t_1$-forward price of the ZC bond with maturity $t_2$, as of $t_0$. We have: $$ Z(t_0,t_1,t_2) = E_{t_0}^{t_1}[Z(t_1,t_2)]\not= Z(t_1,t_2).$$

With a not-trivially stochastic index, there is no way to take out $Z(t_1,t_2)^{-1}$ from under your conditional expectation operator until the running $t_0$ hits $t_1$. It is not $t_0$-measurable.

Note: To clarify @Novice555 comment below, we have ($L(t_1,t_2)=L(t_1,t_1,t_2)$):

$$ E^{t_1}_{0}[L(t_1,t_2)] \stackrel{(1)}{=} E^{t_2}_{0}\left[\frac{dQ^{t_1}}{dQ^{t_2}}\big\vert_{t_1} L(t_1,t_2) \right] $$

where $$ \frac{dQ^{t_1}}{dQ^{t_2}}\big\vert_{s} = \frac{Z(s,t_1)/Z(0,t_1)}{Z(s,t_2)/Z(0,t_2)},$$

hence $$ E^{t_1}_{0}[L(t_1,t_2)] = Z(0,t_1,t_2)E^{t_2}_{0}\left[Z(t_1,t_2)^{-1} L(t_1,t_2) \right]$$

$$ = Z(0,t_1,t_2) E^{t_2}_{0}\left[ L(t_1,t_2) \right] + Z(0,t_1,t_2) E^{t_2}_{0}\left[ L(t_1,t_2)^2\right] $$

$$ = Z(0,t_1,t_2) L(0,t_1,t_2) + Z(0,t_1,t_2) (t_2-t_1) E^{t_2}_{0}\left[ L(t_1,t_2)^2\right] $$

Note that all this can also be obtained from @Gordon's answer on caplets where the strike $K$ is set to $0$.

Also note that for ZC bonds, the same approach (replace $L$ by $Z$ in (1)) gives:

$$ E^{t_1}_{0}[Z(t_1,t_2)] = Z(0,t_1,t_2) E^{t_2}_{0}\left[Z(t_1,t_2)^{-1} Z(t_1,t_2) \right] = Z(0,t_1,t_2) $$

One way to sum up this subject is:

- the forward price of a ZC bond, $Z(\cdot, t_1,t_2)$, is a martingale under the $t_1$-forward measure, while

- the forward interest rate, $L(\cdot, t_1,t_2)$, is a martingale under the $t_2$-forward measure.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.